• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Got my car Dyno'd yesterday......

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉

WRX-STi

Mitsubishi EVO
 
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉
GTO. But that's only if you want a faster car than a Mustang. 😉
 
Originally posted by: andylawcc
speaking of which, how do they Dyno 4WD cars? jack up the front so it's spinning in the air?

You need an AWD dyno to get correct readings. Both the front and rear set of rollers are loaded.

My 300bhp car dynoed about 215awhp stock. AWD + heartbreaker dyno = definitely not a dyno queen.
 
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: arcenite
I wouldn't like those results. That sucks for a V8.

It's not that bad, are you kidding?

that's 300 crank HP easily.. much more than a lot of other V8's out there.

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

Many import V6s do just under a hair of these numbers, and they're V6's. Atleast GM's new V8's have power!
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉

WRX-STi

Mitsubishi EVO

WRX-STi starts at $32,995
Mitsu EVO starts at $29,149 (with only 286 HP)

Mustang GT starts at $25, 860
 
Wow that means the GT must be underrated in terms of torque.

With those numbers, it must be putting out at least 320-350tq at the crank.
 
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉

WRX-STi

Mitsubishi EVO

WRX-STi starts at $32,995
Mitsu EVO starts at $29,149 (with only 286 HP)

Mustang GT starts at $25, 860

Mustang GT has $4,000 dealer markup too. Yeah, the EVO has only 286hp...but it's still faster than the Mustang GT, handles better and has better brakes too.

Still, nice numbers. I like the new Mustang GT.
 
Originally posted by: Heisenberg
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉
GTO. But that's only if you want a faster car than a Mustang. 😉

GTO starts at $32,995 (excellent price for a Grand Prix :roll: )
 
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: Heisenberg
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉
GTO. But that's only if you want a faster car than a Mustang. 😉

GTO starts at $32,995 (excellent price for a Grand Prix :roll: )

it may look bland, but the interior quality is light years ahead of your GT's and its performance is better as well.
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉

WRX-STi

Mitsubishi EVO

WRX-STi starts at $32,995
Mitsu EVO starts at $29,149 (with only 286 HP)

Mustang GT starts at $25, 860

Mustang GT has $4,000 dealer markup too. Yeah, the EVO has only 286hp...but it's still faster than the Mustang GT, handles better and has better brakes too.

Still, nice numbers. I like the new Mustang GT.

Sure it will handle better, Mustangs have never been a handling car....although greatly improved over the years 😉. Show me some numbers where the EVO is quicker in a straight line please.
 
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: Heisenberg
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉
GTO. But that's only if you want a faster car than a Mustang. 😉

GTO starts at $32,995 (excellent price for a Grand Prix :roll: )

it may look bland, but the interior quality is light years ahead of your GT's and its performance is better as well.

I do wish they were available in canada...I wouldn't mind taking one out for a test drive.
 
Originally posted by: andylawcc
speaking of which, how do they Dyno 4WD cars? jack up the front so it's spinning in the air?

I actually asked the guy that...he said, if he can, he pulls one of the drive shafts out.
 
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: Heisenberg
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉
GTO. But that's only if you want a faster car than a Mustang. 😉

GTO starts at $32,995 (excellent price for a Grand Prix :roll: )

The GTO starts at $33k but comes loaded. If you fully load out a GT it'll be in the same range as well. Only you lose out on 100hp.
 
Originally posted by: DaTT
Sure it will handle better, Mustangs have never been a handling car....although greatly improved over the years 😉. Show me some numbers where the EVO is quicker in a straight line please.

Stock EVO:

0-60mph: 4.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.4 seconds @ approx 104mph
Braking 60-0: 108ft (better than a Ferrari 360 Modena)

WRX-STi performance is almost identical to the EVO.
 
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: Heisenberg
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: CraigRT

a stock 4.7L Dakota will dyno in the 200 range.. it's a reasonably quick truck too.

well, aren't truck engine focus on torque than Horsepower?
Toyota's 4.7L on the LX470 and Land Cruiser has like 300hp, and the smaller 4.3L on the LS and SC has more hp.

The Mustang is an "affordable" car with a strong V8. Show me any other car that you can buy for the price of a new mustang with 300 HP. 😉
GTO. But that's only if you want a faster car than a Mustang. 😉

GTO starts at $32,995 (excellent price for a Grand Prix :roll: )

The GTO starts at $33k but comes loaded. If you fully load out a GT it'll be in the same range as well. Only you lose out on 100hp.

But gain SOOOOoooOOOoOOoOOo much in styling
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DaTT
Sure it will handle better, Mustangs have never been a handling car....although greatly improved over the years 😉. Show me some numbers where the EVO is quicker in a straight line please.

Stock EVO:

0-60mph: 4.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.4 seconds @ approx 104mph
Braking 60-0: 108ft (better than a Ferrari 360 Modena)

WRX-STi performance is almost identical to the EVO.

Stock GT is under 5 0-60 and mid 13's 1/4 as well.
 
Originally posted by: DaTT
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DaTT
Sure it will handle better, Mustangs have never been a handling car....although greatly improved over the years 😉. Show me some numbers where the EVO is quicker in a straight line please.

Stock EVO:

0-60mph: 4.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.4 seconds @ approx 104mph
Braking 60-0: 108ft (better than a Ferrari 360 Modena)

WRX-STi performance is almost identical to the EVO.

Stock GT is under 5 0-60 and mid 13's 1/4 as well.

I know, they are very close. I'd give the nod to the EVO's AWD though over most drivers trying to launch the RWD Mustang properly. Can't argue about the handling and brakes though. EVO has you beat. So does the STi. 😉
 
Back
Top