• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Got my 2500K up and running

Smartazz

Diamond Member
Hello all, I just got my new 2500K build up and running BOINC, specifically World Community Grid. I replaced my 3GHz Q6600, any ideas what kind of increase in performance I should get?
 
Besides the new architecture (two generations), a lower TDP and a higher base clock speed (3.3GHz stock), you should have quite the jump in performance.

While I'm not certain if it will be 2x performance (I don't own a Sandy Bridge processor to verify), it should be quite a jump.

Taking Rosetta@home for example (a CPU only project), a 2500K (1.) is #41 in top computers (~4600 credits a day), while a Q6600 (2.) is #367 in top computers (~2600 credits a day). Granted there is overclocking involved (my Q6600 on stock never left ~1200 credits a day), a stock 2500K should be a nice little jump.



1. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/top_hosts.php?sort_by=expavg_credit&offset=40 - first 2500K on the list

2. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/top_hosts.php?sort_by=expavg_credit&offset=360 - first Q6600 on the list
 
I unfortunately haven't been running it 24/7 yet, waiting on my H80 and a modest overclock. I'll update once I got it installed.
 
This may or may not be helpful, but in Correlizer my 2600K@4.3GHz has a RAC of ~6000 while my Q6600@3.0GHz does ~2600 (based on runtimes and awarded credit/WU).
 
That's actually very close to what I had mentioned five days ago with Rosetta@home. In this case a 2500K/2600K has double the output of a Q6600, not bad for two generations of innovations.

I'm wondering if Ivy Bridge will push that to 3x performance of a Q6600?
 
All at lower power consumption to boot. By the way, in BOINC if you click "Run CPU Benchmarks", what results do you get? I get 3687 floating point MIPS per CPU which seems really low considering my Q6600 got about 2900. Does this score matter at all?
 
All at lower power consumption to boot. By the way, in BOINC if you click "Run CPU Benchmarks", what results do you get? I get 3687 floating point MIPS per CPU which seems really low considering my Q6600 got about 2900. Does this score matter at all?
I'm getting a bit over 4k FP MIPS. AFAIK the benchmark results are used by the project scheduler to estimate the amount of work needed by the computer in question.
 
Okay, thanks. Unfortunately since this is a new install of Windows, it periodically restarts my computer and interrupts BOINC. Anyone else have problems with that?
 
Back
Top