Got a Cold Air kit for the car today and a Programmer....

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
"Dynos" are like synthetic benchmarks. They are for newbcheese tuners. IMO.
Well aren't you a master of all trades.

You mean this isnt an Intel vs. AMD thread?

I'm using a Thermaltake SLK as an FMIC on my Volvo. :ninja;
 

jcovercash

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
9,064
0
0
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
My 100% stock 2005 GTO will still kick your Mustang's ass... :)

And? Do I look like I care? I didn't buy my car to outrun GTO's :p

Its the rice I wanna outrun LOL! :p. Muscle, is Muscle, is Muscle. I like it all :D

You're welcome to take on my Volvo. Last trapped 107, still working on a better tuning solution.

And there's no way in the world that any sort of intake kit adds 30 wheel horse power. I'd guess that an intake, with nice dual exhaust and a custom (read: on the dyno) tune would net you between 30 and 35rwhp.

The only way in the world that would be is if the intake was designed to be super restrictive....which I doubt the stock mustang airbox is.

The ironic thing to me, is that the "heat shield" that supposedly blocks the engine bay heat from the filter, also blocks the filter - seems like it would lower flow, and I doubt the slightly reduced temp from the heat shield would make up for it.

Call it what you want, its still an SRI. SRI's are known to take from down low and put it up top. If you havent dynoed it, any increase in performance is mostly psychological from the much louder sound. Either way, I'm sure it sounds sweet, but any real gains you got are more likely from the tuning, not the SRI.



You obiviously don't know how air flows into the engine bay on these mustangs then. It flows in from the bottom right below the filter. There is a hole in the body where the air flows up. But what does it matter, ATOT always knows more than anyone.

Obviously I dont, I never professed to be an expert on every car ever made. Seems like an odd place to get air - most cars Ive seen get it from the front or the fenderwell. Either way, blocking half of the filter is going to block potential intake flow. It may still be an overall net gain given the colder air, but I doubt its anywhere near 30hp.



If you don't know about the car then don't comment on it...... You can't mount an air intake system in the fenders of the new mustangs, simply no room, and the fender is closed off so no air would flow in there.

Half of the filter is not blocked from air, the cooler outside air is coming into the engine bay where the cover is not at..... giving the cold air to the filter/intake before it goes into the hot engine bay.

Prove to me that all the individuals that use this product are not getting the dyno proven ~25hp, and that all the magazines that have reviewed this and similar setups for the 05/06 gt are lying. If not then STFU.

Josh
 

jcovercash

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
9,064
0
0
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Bandwith limit exceeded. :laugh:

Dynos are a good baseline, and tell you where your car is at performance wise.

You don't get it. You need a baseline dyno, from your car, with no modifications. That way you can document via dyno how much power you gain from each change. A dyno before mods are done is what we call a baseline dyno.

Otherwise, dyno numbers are useless as a means of comparison. As evidenced by my puny 530hp lightning beating 900hp Supras.



I didn't have a dyno availible today, and wanted this stuff installed. It takes 20-25 mins to go back to stock and I plan on doing it when I get a chance to hit the dyno. To see my actual gain.

I never said I got a 30 HP increase. I said people have reported. From all the independent testing and stuff, I will belive this untill I am proved wrong, should I be, by my dyno runs.

Josh
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
My 100% stock 2005 GTO will still kick your Mustang's ass... :)

And? Do I look like I care? I didn't buy my car to outrun GTO's :p

Its the rice I wanna outrun LOL! :p. Muscle, is Muscle, is Muscle. I like it all :D

You're welcome to take on my Volvo. Last trapped 107, still working on a better tuning solution.

And there's no way in the world that any sort of intake kit adds 30 wheel horse power. I'd guess that an intake, with nice dual exhaust and a custom (read: on the dyno) tune would net you between 30 and 35rwhp.

The only way in the world that would be is if the intake was designed to be super restrictive....which I doubt the stock mustang airbox is.

The ironic thing to me, is that the "heat shield" that supposedly blocks the engine bay heat from the filter, also blocks the filter - seems like it would lower flow, and I doubt the slightly reduced temp from the heat shield would make up for it.

Call it what you want, its still an SRI. SRI's are known to take from down low and put it up top. If you havent dynoed it, any increase in performance is mostly psychological from the much louder sound. Either way, I'm sure it sounds sweet, but any real gains you got are more likely from the tuning, not the SRI.



You obiviously don't know how air flows into the engine bay on these mustangs then. It flows in from the bottom right below the filter. There is a hole in the body where the air flows up. But what does it matter, ATOT always knows more than anyone.

Obviously I dont, I never professed to be an expert on every car ever made. Seems like an odd place to get air - most cars Ive seen get it from the front or the fenderwell. Either way, blocking half of the filter is going to block potential intake flow. It may still be an overall net gain given the colder air, but I doubt its anywhere near 30hp.



If you don't know about the car then don't comment on it...... You can't mount an air intake system in the fenders of the new mustangs, simply no room, and the fender is closed off so no air would flow in there.

Half of the filter is not blocked from air, the cooler outside air is coming into the engine bay where the cover is not at..... giving the cold air to the filter/intake before it goes into the hot engine bay.

Prove to me that all the individuals that use this product are not getting the dyno proven ~25hp, and that all the magazines that have reviewed this and similar setups for the 05/06 gt are lying. If not then STFU.

Josh

Ill comment on whatever TF I please. Don't post here bragging about something unless you expect others to comment on it.

I don't have to prove a damn thing to you...you havent proven anything yourself, all you've got is your butt-dyno and your ears telling you that your car is faster, when in reality most intakes give a negligible boost unless the factory intake is extra restrictive, and the boost it does give isnt unilateral. I've never believed a manufacturers claims, and I never will.

How about you show US your dyno proving you got 30hp out of it? If not, then STFU.
 

I Saw OJ

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2004
4,923
2
76
I couldnt view the picutres, but cool anyway.

I picked up a JLT CAI, bassani X pipe and catback for my cobra. I have the predator tuner coming in the mail and they say to expect over 430hp to the wheels with just those 4 things, i'm stoked.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
"Dynos" are like synthetic benchmarks. They are for newbcheese tuners. IMO.
Well aren't you a master of all trades.

You mean this isnt an Intel vs. AMD thread?

I'm using a Thermaltake SLK as an FMIC on my Volvo. :ninja;
Thermaltake doesn't even have an SLK series. :confused:
 

RGN

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2000
6,623
6
81
I don't have an CAI comments, but GTO FTW!!! There will be no Pony or snake in my garage. :D


 

Twista

Diamond Member
Jun 19, 2003
9,646
1
0
i just got a k&n air filter in my stang. It picked up with pulling in the higer rpm range =) I dunno what a CAI would do for my GT, but i might change it out next summer.
 

VirginiaDonkey

Golden Member
May 18, 2001
1,704
0
0
nice choice on the SCT tuner!
everything I have read about it says it is outstanding.

Can't view the pics of the intake, but as long as its not the "hot air intake" that sucks the under hood air, you will pick up a decent amount of HP. Hell, back in the old 5.0 days, just removing the silencer was good for 5 HP
 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: AdamSnow
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: MaxFusion16
that's not cold air, it's just a short ram air intake.

i'm willing to bet that actually robs performance


WTF do you know, alot of people are reporting +30 RWHP with his Cold Air kit and tune.

Clearly you are suffering from what I like to call Ricer Math. There is NO way that you can get 30rwhp from an air intake, unless that air intake is actually an intercooler which has a super/turbocharger attached too it...

You should have got a before+after dyno... or better yet, you shouldn't... cause you would be VERY disappointed in the money you spent if you were looking for 30rwhp.



You drive a friggin Neon. Not a V8 Car. So what would you know about real horsepower???

The 30HP is not just from the intake, its from a combination of the intake/tune.

Josh


so is your car a V8? or the V6 your confusing me. you said4.6 V6 before
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Bandwith limit exceeded. :laugh:

Dynos are a good baseline, and tell you where your car is at performance wise.

You don't get it. You need a baseline dyno, from your car, with no modifications. That way you can document via dyno how much power you gain from each change. A dyno before mods are done is what we call a baseline dyno.

Otherwise, dyno numbers are useless as a means of comparison. As evidenced by my puny 530hp lightning beating 900hp Supras.



I didn't have a dyno availible today, and wanted this stuff installed. It takes 20-25 mins to go back to stock and I plan on doing it when I get a chance to hit the dyno. To see my actual gain.

I never said I got a 30 HP increase. I said people have reported. From all the independent testing and stuff, I will belive this untill I am proved wrong, should I be, by my dyno runs.

Josh

I doubt anyone on ATOT is enough of a jerk to keep bumping this thread to make sure you post dyno results. Be thankful this forum has a short attention span :thumbsup:

Your pics are dead but the way you describe the intake, it sounds like an underhood, short-ram intake. Not very much unlike K&N's underhood, short-ram intake, which they claim nets a max gain of 9 HP--not to be confused with a gain of max HP of 9HP. I wonder what special materials or physics the scientists in the DeMolet lab used to get such a bigger gain.

Have you ever considered that your gains may be mostly due to the tune?

At any rate, congrats on the car...go blue oval! :)
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
"Dynos" are like synthetic benchmarks. They do not indicate real world performance. They are for newbcheese tuners. IMO.

I really hope you're kidding, since that's an incredibly stupid thing to say.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,012
2,682
126
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
"Dynos" are like synthetic benchmarks. They do not indicate real world performance. They are for newbcheese tuners. IMO.

I really hope you're kidding, since that's an incredibly stupid thing to say.

Hey, according to Howard, Im the master of all trades. So I know what Im talking about. ;)
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
"Dynos" are like synthetic benchmarks. They do not indicate real world performance. They are for newbcheese tuners. IMO.

I really hope you're kidding, since that's an incredibly stupid thing to say.

Hey, according to Howard, Im the master of all trades. So I know what Im talking about. ;)
How about master of none?
 

RGUN

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2005
1,007
3
76
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: RGUN
I doubt you'll see a peak gain of 30hp for the upgrades. I recently had the pleasure of seeing all these mods and an exhaust go onto a new mustang GT and I think the result of everything was like +20hp peak.

Ok, if you say so. The right intake/tune/Full exhaust. Longtube headers, offroad h/x pipe/muffs will add more than 20hp on a 3v motor.


Where did I mention headers? Im not making numbers up, this is the actual result. So many people (Im not grouping you in with these people) think, ohh CAI +5, exhaust +10, tune +10 headers +5 ohh damn thats +30hp... so my 270 is now 300... whereas in reality those increases in peak dont all occur at the same rpm and you would more likely end up with maybe a +15 gain. Now those number I pulled out my ass but you get my point I hope.
 

Antisocial Virge

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 1999
6,578
0
0
You guys also have to look where the gain is happening. The gain of 20+ HP is at 5300 rpm. Is that gonna really make a diff to most anybody? Its only like 7 hp at 3000 rpm where its gonna get the most use.
Its 10 HP at 4000 rmp and only 5 hp over the stock pipe with the tune.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
:laugh:

I'm sure the 5HP you got from the K&N filter is really putting a strain on your Butt Dyno.
 

Pepsi90919

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,162
1
81
Bandwidth Limit Exceeded
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apache/1.3.33 Server at www.jcovercash.atothosting.com Port 80
 

Viperoni

Lifer
Jan 4, 2000
11,084
1
71
Originally posted by: Antisocial Virge
You guys also have to look where the gain is happening. The gain of 20+ HP is at 5300 rpm. Is that gonna really make a diff to most anybody? Its only like 7 hp at 3000 rpm where its gonna get the most use.
Its 10 HP at 4000 rmp and only 5 hp over the stock pipe with the tune.

The point is that not only is the gain there, but in a very valuable place for racing purposes.
 

dak125

Golden Member
Jan 11, 2003
1,363
0
76
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: AdamSnow
Originally posted by: jcovercash
Originally posted by: MaxFusion16
that's not cold air, it's just a short ram air intake.

i'm willing to bet that actually robs performance


WTF do you know, alot of people are reporting +30 RWHP with his Cold Air kit and tune.

Clearly you are suffering from what I like to call Ricer Math. There is NO way that you can get 30rwhp from an air intake, unless that air intake is actually an intercooler which has a super/turbocharger attached too it...

You should have got a before+after dyno... or better yet, you shouldn't... cause you would be VERY disappointed in the money you spent if you were looking for 30rwhp.



You drive a friggin Neon. Not a V8 Car. So what would you know about real horsepower???

Wow, I just don't know how to respond to such a stupid statement.