GOP senators: US, not Israel, should attack Iran ?if necessary?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Freshgeardude

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2006
4,506
0
76
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: TheSkinsFan
He (Sen. Graham) continued: "If the sanctions fail, and Iran's going down the road to get a nuclear weapon, any Sunni Arab state that could, would want a nuclear weapon. Israel will be more imperiled. The world will change dramatically for the worst. Military action should be the last resort anyone looks at, and I would rather our allies and us take military action if it's necessary."

The Senator was simply suggesting a course of action should sanctions and diplomatic efforts eventually fail.

I wholeheartedly disagree with Graham that the U.S. should take the lead in military strikes against Iran, as I believe war with Iran would be an epic mistake, but he did not "call for war with Iran."

The title of this thread makes it a troll post. Please fix it.

agreed

QFT x3

x4



While I believe any attack on Iran would be a last resort. I think it is safe to assume that if we attack (we as in any country of the world) Iran, that they will wage war. But only attack after we threaten to do exactly what we say and after we do every sanction possible to isolate the country