GOP: nothing to sell but fear itself

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
RNC document mocks donors, plays on 'fear'

Direct link to presentation (PDF)

Exclusive: RNC document mocks donors, plays on 'fear'
By: Ben Smith
March 3, 2010 04:23 PM EST

The Republican National Committee plans to raise money this election cycle through an aggressive campaign capitalizing on “fear” of President Barack Obama and a promise to "save the country from trending toward socialism."

The strategy was detailed in a confidential party fundraising presentation, obtained by POLITICO, which also outlines how “ego-driven” wealthy donors can be tapped with offers of access and “tchochkes.”

The presentation was delivered by RNC Finance Director Rob Bickhart to top donors and fundraisers at a party retreat in Boca Grande, Florida on February 18, a source at the gathering said.

In neat PowerPoint pages, it lifts the curtain on the often-cynical terms of political marketing, displaying an air of disdain for the party’s donors that is usually confined to the barroom conversations of political operatives.

The presentation explains the Republican fundraising in simple terms.

"What can you sell when you do not have the White House, the House, or the Senate...?" it asks.

The answer: "Save the country from trending toward Socialism!”


Manipulating donors with crude caricatures and playing on their fears is hardly unique to Republicans or to the RNC – Democrats raised millions off George W. Bush in similar terms – but rarely is it practiced in such cartoonish terms.

One page, headed “The Evil Empire,” pictures Obama as the Joker from Batman, while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leaders Harry Reid are depicted as Cruella DeVille and Scooby Doo, respectively.

The document, which two Republican sources said was prepared by the party’s finance staff, comes as Chairman Michael Steele struggles to retain the trust and allegiance of major donors, who can give as much as $30,400 a year to the party.

Under Steele, the RNC has shifted toward a reliance on small donors, but the document reveals extensive, confidential details of the strategy for luring wealthy checkwriters, which range from luxury retreats in California wine country to tickets to a professional fight in Las Vegas.

The 72-page document was provided to POLITICO by a Democrat, who said a hard copy had been left in the hotel hosting the $2,500-a-head retreat, the Gasparilla Inn & Club. Sources at the event said the presentation was delivered by Bickhart and by the RNC Finance Chairman, Peter Terpeluk, a former ambassador to Luxembourg under President George W. Bush.

The RNC reacted with alarm to a question about it Wednesday, emailing major donors to warn them of a reporter’s question, and distancing Steele from its contents.

“The document was used for a fundraising presentation Chairman Steele did not attend, nor had he seen the document,” RNC Communications Director Doug Heye said in an email. “Fundraising documents are often controversial.

“Obviously, the Chairman disagrees with the language and finds the use of such imagery to be unacceptable. It will not be used by the Republican National Committee – in any capacity – in the future,” Heye said.

The most unusual section of the presentation is a set of six slides headed “RNC Marketing 101.” The presentation divides fundraising into two traditional categories, direct marketing and major donors, and lays out the details of how to approach each group.

The small donors who are the targets of direct marketing are described under the heading “Visceral Giving.” Their motivations are listed as “fear;” “Extreme negative feelings toward existing Administration;” and “Reactionary.”

Major donors, by contrast, are treated in a column headed “Calculated Giving.”
Their motivations include: “Peer to Peer Pressure”; “access”; and “Ego-Driven.”

The slide also allows that donors may have more honorable motives, including “Patriotic Duty.”

A major Republican donor described the state of the RNC’s relationship with major donors as “disastrous,” with veteran givers beginning to abandon the committee, which is becoming increasingly reliant on small donors.

The party’s average contribution in 2009, according to the document, was just $40, and the shift toward a financial reliance on the grassroots may help explain Steele’s increasingly strident tone toward the Obama Administration.

While the crude portrayal of Obama may be - as Steele ‘s spokesman put it - “unacceptable,” other elements of the presentation may be of equal interest to close political observers.

The RNC plans to raise $8.6 million from major donors alone in 2010, less than 10% of its total 2009 fundraising take, which was primarily from small donors."


The center of that plan is an extensive, and colorful, schedule of events. Along with traditional fundraisers with conservative luminaries including Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol and former presidential candidate Steve Forbes, the party plans to raise $80,000 for a trip to London to meet David Cameron, the British Conservative Party leader, on September 17.

The RNC’s “Young Eagles” – younger major donors and the only group, according to a major donor, continuing to pull its weight financially – are invited to a “professional bull riding event” in October, expected to raise $50,000, and to a no-holds-barred Ultimate Fighting Championship fight in Las Vegas the same month, expected to raise $60,000.

The RNC’s aim, according to one section of the document: “Putting the Fun Back in FUNdraising.”

Many have observed Republican fear mongering tactics to control their voters in recent years. Here's the documentation. What's interesting is that they are revealing to donors the tactics they use to get donors to cough up!

It a pity that FUD works because people don't stop to think for themselves.


.
 
Last edited:

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
The small donors who are the targets of direct marketing are described under the heading “Visceral Giving.” Their motivations are listed as “fear;” “Extreme negative feelings toward existing Administration;” and “Reactionary.”

Not that the author is wrong, the Republicans don't have anything positive going for them right now. But how is this different from the Democrats?

Global Warming/Healthcare : Fear
Bush : Extreme feelings about the administration
Reactionary : Just read this forum
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Do you think The Dems plan really that different? Fear... haha neither side has a monopoly on fear. Hell the Dems have used Fear in the Jim Bunning opposition of unfunded unemployment benefits like master the last few days and the press went right along...
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,599
6,715
126
Isn't the essence of conservatism the fear of change? Why else conserve?

Change is reality.

If you say that progressives fear sameness, that is really quite lame because change is inevitable and to try to stop what will be is quite insane. It is silly to say that progressives fear insanity because insanity is something anybody with sense tries to avoid.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
People bash the republicans. Me too. But reality is, if things fall apart like healthcare reform and banking reform, no one is to blame but democrats.

Sure, the republicans are going to have a meltdown as reform nears. As democrats move to address issues. Republicans are going to lie, whine, scream, kick and yell like a 4 year old child that missed nap time, but like with any spoiled 4 year old, we should just ignore them.
Regardless what the talking republicans heads may say on tv, what Rush says on radio, or what wicked brew Cheney stirs up in his black cauldron, or what selective memory John Boehner displays, the ball is in the democrats court now. Republicans have been reduced to a sound bite, a whimper. Any failure, any frustration the democrats suffer from here on out will be of their own making.

If it all falls apart, doesnt happen or fails to happen, the power in charge cannot blame republicans for failure. Not anymore. Not at this point.

At this stage in the game, democrats should be riding on easy street, full steam ahead.
If victory is derailed, they can't blame the republicans. Whatever republicans may think or say from here on out is somewhat moot. Let them whine, spin or outright lie, it no longer matters. At this point it only matters if democrats let it matter. Guess we'll soon see if the democrats have the required attention span.

I was wondering if Obama’s last healthcare pitch was a lecture to republicans, the American people, or more so addressed to his own democrats in power?
I really wondered.
Obama doesnt need to get republicans in line, they never will be.
But his fellow democrats in congress? Thats another story.

I watch Rachel Maddow, Countdown, and Chris Matthews have their nightly attack on what republicans are saying, doing, said, twisted, or spun to the media and I think “so what?”. Who cares?
I think their frustration is really not with the republican spin masters, but the fear that after all this, after all the time spent, they fear democrats just cannot be relied on to carry the ball all the way down the field. And that is our frustration. Tripping over their own shoe strings on that last sprint.

It’s really kind of funny, and pathetic, why anyone should care what republicans say at this point. We know where they are coming from, what they are, what they stand for. They have made that more than clear to everyone.
So what is it that democrats, like Obama and many other party members are really afraid of?
Why care what McCain says about anything? What Cheney says? What Palin says? What Senator John Boehner or Grassley says? Why should anyone really care… especially democrats?
Democrats have the ball. The path is clear. The goal is in site. They is nothing to get in the way, except those darn shoe strings.
 
Last edited:

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
People bash the republicans. Me too. But reality is, if things fall apart like healthcare reform and banking reform, no one is to blame but democrats.

Sure, the republicans are going to have a meltdown as reform nears. As democrats move to address issues. Republicans are going to lie, whine, scream, kick and yell like a 4 year old child that missed nap time, but like with any spoiled 4 year old, we should just ignore them.
Regardless what the talking republicans heads may say on tv, what Rush says on radio, or what wicked brew Cheney stirs up in his black cauldron, or what selective memory John Boehner displays, the ball is in the democrats court now. Republicans have been reduced to a sound bite, a whimper. Any failure, any frustration the democrats suffer from here on out will be of their own making.

If it all falls apart, doesnt happen or fails to happen, the power in charge cannot blame republicans for failure. Not anymore. Not at this point.

At this stage in the game, democrats should be riding on easy street, full steam ahead.
If victory is derailed, they can't blame the republicans. Whatever republicans may think or say from here on out is somewhat moot. Let them whine, spin or outright lie, it no longer matters. At this point it only matters if democrats let it matter. Guess we'll soon see if the democrats have the required attention span.

I was wondering if Obama?s last healthcare pitch was a lecture to republicans, the American people, or more so addressed to his own democrats in power?
I really wondered.
Obama doesnt need to get republicans in line, they never will be.
But his fellow democrats in congress? Thats another story.

I watch Rachel Maddow, Countdown, and Chris Matthews have their nightly attack on what republicans are saying, doing, said, twisted, or spun to the media and I think ?so what??. Who cares?
I think their frustration is really not with the republican spin masters, but the fear that after all this, after all the time spent, they fear democrats just cannot be relied on to carry the ball all the way down the field. And that is our frustration. Tripping over their own shoe strings on that last sprint.

It?s really kind of funny, and pathetic, why anyone should care what republicans say at this point. We know where they are coming from, what they are, what they stand for. They have made that more than clear to everyone.
So what is it that democrats, like Obama and many other party members are really afraid of?
Why care what McCain says about anything? What Cheney says? What Palin says? What Senator John Boehner or Grassley says? Why should anyone really care? especially democrats?
Democrats have the ball. The path is clear. The goal is in site. They is nothing to get in the way, except those darn shoe strings.

I'm just going to respond to your MSNBC comments, but it's too much hassle to edit here.

I think your comments are way off mark. I've ben watching Maddow and Olbermann the last week or so, and I find in this sampling them to have very valid points affecting major policy issues.

Your comments seem irrational to me - when they eplain things like outright lies over and over trying to stop healthcare, you say it's not the lying or the effects on policy, it's some bizarre person prejudice.

There's no talking with that sort of irrationality. THeir shows are clearly not about that.

Some people are irrational, ascribing these motives. Last night, I heard a host let a caller go on about how all planes' trailing smoke is done to kill all the people. He believed it.

If you can't recognize the accuracy of the many careful reports I saw - like comments about reconciliation that were clearly wrong and often hypocritical - and think they're somehow lying for sinister motives, or you think some sinister reason is behind planes' trails - how is having the rational explanation repeated going to help?
 
Last edited:

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Sportage, you're forgetting about the 70 corporatists that make up the senate. Oh sure they talk a good game to their respective constituents but when it comes to voting they'll have 5-10 fall guys, every-time random, as an excuse not to get shit done. Perfect example is public option played out this last year in HC.

First they claimed they just couldn't do it because the only had 56 - Liberman, Nelson and others held out. Now, as they are prepared to pass a bill with only 50 through reconciliation, guess what, they found another 7 lead by Rockefeller to say it's just too divisive even though it's the most popular section of the house bill.
 
Last edited:

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
The Republicans state what they envision will happen under the Dems

The Dems state what they will envision happening if they can not get their way.

Whoever can spin their story the best and provided some evidence to support their concept wins.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
This title should be changed to "Politicians:nothing to sell but fear itself".
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
This title should be changed to "Politicians:nothing to sell but fear itself".

I invite you to show where any other party has acknowledged the use of 'fear' in their marketing materials?

Talking down the other side, bickering, spin are all part of the normal message control process used by all politicians, but using fear as a regular and programmed method is a new low.


.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
I invite you to show where any other party has acknowledged the use of 'fear' in their marketing materials?

Talking down the other side, bickering, spin are all part of the normal message control process used by all politicians, but using fear as a regular and programmed method is a new low.


.

TEH GLOBAL WARMINGZ IS GOING TO KILL US ALL IF WE DON'T GIVE OUR MONEY TO GOOOOOOREEEEEE!!!!!!!

WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!

Yep, no fear there.
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
TEH GLOBAL WARMINGZ IS GOING TO KILL US ALL IF WE DON'T GIVE OUR MONEY TO GOOOOOOREEEEEE!!!!!!!

WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!

Yep, no fear there.

There is enough scientific data to show that something needs to be done. In any case who is spreading the message using fear? Just because you feel like shouting over the internet does not make it true.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
I invite you to show where any other party has acknowledged the use of 'fear' in their marketing materials?

Talking down the other side, bickering, spin are all part of the normal message control process used by all politicians, but using fear as a regular and programmed method is a new low.


.

You have to be deaf, blind, and dumb to believe this only happens on one side of the aisle. Since I know you arent, stop trying to pretend it does.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,013
46,620
136
There's this trend I've been noticing...

When something is posted detailing the questionable actions of Repubs, the quite common response is to make a comment about how that doesn't just apply to the GOP, but to all politicians. Nevermind the details, it's endemic and therefore not an issue at all.

When something is posted detailing the questionable actions of Dems, the quite common response is to bash them without reservation, making references to political scandals decades old, and/or to repeat ad nauseum the current talking points relevant to the particular issue. The "two sides of the same coin" adage rarely applies somehow...curious.



Anyway, nice try Bober. Your lame attempt to malign Dems with Global Warming FUD doesn't match with history. There's plenty you can criticize the Dem party for, your distaste for Al Gore isn't one that's reasonable. I'd like to see any attempt at fearmongering done by the Dems that even comes close to what the GOP had done with WMD and Saddam. In this regard, the two sides are not alike.
Will you try, or will you run away like you did in that last thread?

*cough* http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2053879&page=2
 
Last edited:

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
There's this trend I've been noticing...

When something is posted detailing the questionable actions of Repubs, the quite common response is to make a comment about how that doesn't just apply to the GOP, but to all politicians. Nevermind the details, it's endemic and therefore not an issue at all.

When something is posted detailing the questionable actions of Dems, the quite common response is to bash them without reservation, making references to political scandals decades old, and/or to repeat ad nauseum the current talking points relevant to the particular issue. The "two sides of the same coin" adage rarely applies somehow...curious.



Anyway, nice try Bober. Your lame attempt to malign Dems with Global Warming FUD doesn't match with history. There's plenty you can criticize the Dem party for, your distaste for Al Gore isn't one that's reasonable. I'd like to see any attempt at fearmongering done by the Dems that even comes close to what the GOP had done with WMD and Saddam. In this regard, the two sides are not alike.
Will you try, or will you run away like you did in that last thread?

Nobody said they like it but welcome to reality. Politicians sell fear. Always have, always will.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
This plan will work very well. I know most of my friends and co-workers are donating out the wazoo to try to stop Obama.

If they want to raise a mint just say "Your donation will help stop Obama and his destructive policies" and they're golden.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
TEH GLOBAL WARMINGZ IS GOING TO KILL US ALL IF WE DON'T GIVE OUR MONEY TO GOOOOOOREEEEEE!!!!!!!

WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!

Yep, no fear there.

If not mistaken Al Gore held no political office when the movie was filmed and was not speaking on behalf of the Democratic Party at the time.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
This plan will work very well. I know most of my friends and co-workers are donating out the wazoo to try to stop Obama.

I don't think the rats down in your basement can legally donate to any cause nor do I think that if you put them up on your keyboard we'd notice much difference in the quality of your posts lately. Seek help.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
I don't think the rats down in your basement can legally donate to any cause nor do I think that if you put them up on your keyboard we'd notice much difference in the quality of your posts lately. Seek help.

Funny. You think I'm not being serious. That kind of elitism is going to roll over Obama and the dems in November like a damn tsunami. These are people that never got involved in politics or voted much that are now highly motivated to stop obama.

And I don't buy the wealthy donors would be cutting down. They stand the most punishment by Obama so I'd predict their donations actually go up to stop him.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,013
46,620
136
Nobody said they like it but welcome to reality. Politicians sell fear. Always have, always will.

Don't be obtuse. You don't have to express approval for anything if you're claiming to be impartial. Following through with the whole impartial thing definitely matters though. I'm speaking about politicians but also the posters here who support them.
I can't agree with your sweeping generalization either, there are plenty of Dems who don't play by the same rules as Repubs, and vice versa.

There is a saying that "Conservatives vote against what they fear, liberals vote for what they hope," and for the most part I've found this to be correct. There is a direct correlation to the strategies of both parties here. Sure Dems have employed some fear before, but it just isn't on the same scale as what the Repubs do on a continual basis. I can only assume the far right's addiction to outrage and victimization has something to do with it.

If there is something out there in the way of proof that serves as a Dem analog to the Repub fear-based behavior irt WMD, gay marriage, Death Panels, whatever, by all means provide it and I'll gladly peruse and consider it.

You can disapprove of both parties (hell, you should!), but let's drop this pretense that all politicians are alike in this regard. While we're at it, let's drop the act about holding Repubs to the same level of scrutiny that Dems are held to. This forum's search function proves it's mostly window dressing.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Don't be obtuse. You don't have to express approval for anything if you're claiming to be impartial. Following through with the whole impartial thing definitely matters though. I'm speaking about politicians but also the posters here who support them.
I can't agree with your sweeping generalization either, there are plenty of Dems who don't play by the same rules as Repubs, and vice versa.

There is a saying that "Conservatives vote against what they fear, liberals vote for what they hope," and for the most part I've found this to be correct. There is a direct correlation to the strategies of both parties here. Sure Dems have employed some fear before, but it just isn't on the same scale as what the Repubs do on a continual basis. I can only assume the far right's addiction to outrage and victimization has something to do with it.

If there is something out there in the way of proof that serves as a Dem analog to the Repub fear-based behavior irt WMD, gay marriage, Death Panels, whatever, by all means provide it and I'll gladly peruse and consider it.

You can disapprove of both parties (hell, you should!), but let's drop this pretense that all politicians are alike in this regard. While we're at it, let's drop the act about holding Repubs to the same level of scrutiny that Dems are held to. This forum's search function proves it's mostly window dressing.

Take the blinders off

SS reform sends granny out on the streets
If we dont pass the stimulus we lose 500 million jobs
Without healthcare reform the poor will die in the streets
Without welfare people starve in the streets
Foxnews

That is just a small sampling of the fear mongering done from the Democrats.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
687
126
You can disapprove of both parties (hell, you should!), but let's drop this pretense that all politicians are alike in this regard. While we're at it, let's drop the act about holding Repubs to the same level of scrutiny that Dems are held to. This forum's search function proves it's mostly window dressing.

Oh, because you disapprove of Republicans (at least from what I can tell of your posts), they should be scrutinized more than Democrats?

All politicians are alike with maybe minor technical differences. Republicans operate with FUD. Democrats use FUD as well but typically frame it in the class warfare context. Whatever these minor differences (and they are minor in the grand scheme), the only constant is the thirst for power shared by both parties. We need to kick them both out.

EDIT: And Genx just posted the typical FUD used by the Democrats, most of which prove my point about the class warfare FUD.
 
Last edited: