• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

GOP New Hampshire Lawmaker Urges Married Couples To Practice Abstinence

HomerJS

Lifer
I guess Republicans are trying to give the President a vacation this fall. Its getting hard to keep up with all these wacky conservatives.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...-hampshire-lawmaker-abstinence_n_1284934.html

A New Hampshire lawmaker with a history of surprising statements suggested on Thursday that married couples who want to use contraception should practice abstinence instead of using birth control pills.

State Rep. Lynne Blankenbeker (R-Concord) made the claim -- noting that abstinence is available "over the counter" along with condoms -- during a legislative committee hearing on a resolution urging the Obama administration to drop the birth control requirement for religious organizations. Blankenbeker was trying to explain her position on why the administration's requirement to provide insurance coverage for birth control should be overturned.

"People with or without insurance have two affordable choices, one being abstinence and the other being condoms, both of which you can get over the counter," she said.

The comments came at the same hearing where state Rep. Jeanine Notter (R-Merrimack) claimed that birth control pills lead to prostate cancer. In an interview with Merrimack Patch, Notter said that she was referring to studies discussing potentially high levels of estrogen in the environment through birth control pills and a connection to prostate cancer.

Blankenbeker was engaged in a dialogue with Sylvia Kennedy, a New Hampshire doctor, who was testifying in support of Obama's plan. Kennedy urged the coverage of birth control and responded to Blankenbeker that condoms are not a foolproof means of contraception, and also suggested that abstinence does not work all the time, a notion Blankenbeker disagreed with.
"Abstinence works 100 percent of the time," she said.

Blankenbeker also asserted that condoms and abstinence offer married couples a wider range of family planning options than oral contraceptives.

"If you decide you want to get pregnant you can refrain from abstinence," she said.
Blankenbeker declined a request to comment.

The resolution was introduced last week in the Tea Party-controlled New Hampshire House by Majority Leader D.J. Betencourt (R-Salem) with the goal of urging the Obama administration to reverse course on the contraception coverage mandate. Betencourt's resolution came the same day that Obama changed the original mandate for religious groups to provide birth control coverage to employees, shifting policy to make insurance companies provide the coverage for employees of religious groups.

Blankenbeker's comments have gained attention before, including a statement she made last year claiming that Osama bin Laden was not dead and a suggestion that she use her military training to shoot at unions.
 
The OP "forgot" half of Lynne's statement in his thread title. Most likely HomerJS "forgot" it because he loses much of his emotional component if he had "remembered" to add it.
 
Because it's cheaper than the insurance company paying for childbirth and all of the associated costs?

Isn't that up to the insurance company?

Do you understand the concept of insurance?

Has anybody ever had accidental recreational sex?

Do you think there has ever been an instance of somebody saying, "damn, if I only had insurance, I could go afford $10 for a box of condoms..." before plowing a girl?

There is no justification whatsoever for making an insurance company pay for recreational sex. None. Don't shift the responsibility for an individual's actions from the individual to a private corporation.
 
I'm still waiting to find out why insurance companies should be paying for recreational sex to begin with.

Because they prefer it to paying for pregnancy, childbirth, & providing healthcare services to children on their parents' policies for the following 25 years...

You might notice that insurance providers haven't raised any objections to that provision in the new law, for good reason...
 
You might notice that insurance providers haven't raised any objections to that provision in the new law, for good reason...

They didn't object because it will just be priced into premiums. Since everyone now has to buy health insurance and they have a legally mandated maximum percentage of overhead and profit they actually benefit from providing more services. If it really saved them money I would think they would have already made in free in the old days when their profits weren't regulated. However, one unfortunate side effect of Obamacare is that by capping overhead and profit it has taken away some of the incentive for insurance companies to reduce costs.
 
Because they prefer it to paying for pregnancy, childbirth, & providing healthcare services to children on their parents' policies for the following 25 years...

That makes complete sense... but it should be up to the insurance companies to make that determination, there shouldn't be a law mandating that they have to cover it. I think birth control coverage should be mandated only as it relates to medical use (ie, not for contraception). If you want to prevent pregnancy, you can pay for it yourself, that's not a medical issue.
 
Maybe they should stop providing care for anything that is the result of an accident from a recreational activity?

Broke your leg skiing? You pay.
 
"If you decide you want to get pregnant you can refrain from abstinence," she said.
Blankenbeker declined a request to comment.



That's one of the most tortured euphemism for sex I've ever heard.
 
Maybe they should stop providing care for anything that is the result of an accident from a recreational activity?

Broke your leg skiing? You pay.

Or Cancer, Heart Disease, car accidents. Heck why even have health insurance, we never had it back in my grand fathers day, and most of the hospitals were public and fund by local taxing districts. Sounds like a plan to me.
 
Or Cancer, Heart Disease, car accidents. Heck why even have health insurance, we never had it back in my grand fathers day, and most of the hospitals were public and fund by local taxing districts. Sounds like a plan to me.

I think each state should create its own public health system. This would solve a lot of problems.
 
And "recreational sex" is believed by ignorant men to be the only reason for using birth control pills.

Maybe the Republicans should push masturbation for married couples for those times when abstinence just won't do.
 
does anyone actually care about state representatives? I couldn't even tell you who mine is without looking it up.

You have to in my State, Dem's sat on their hands in the election cycle and now see what kind of shit we have to deal with.
 
Back
Top