• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Googol is suing Google.

Yet another crazy lawsuit in this world that is a waste of tax dollars.

The Inquirer article.

NOW THAT Google's IPO is running, the company is on the verge of being sued by the family of a man who invented the word 'Googol' to describe a very big number. Professor Edward Kasner came up with the word Googol, apparently at the suggestion of his 9-year-old nephew, Milton Sirotta.

He used the term in the 1940s in his book, Mathematics and the Imagination. For the record a googol is 10 raised to the 100th power - or the number 1 followed by a hundred zeros.

In 1955 he died and much later a search engine called Google was born. His relatives claim that Kasner must be spinning in his grave. They believe Google has gained financially at their expense and they want to become IPO insiders to put his soul to rest.

Hacks from the Baltimore Sun interviewed Kasner's great-niece Peri Fleisher who is coincidently a compensation specialist for a Silicon Valley firm. She admitted that she was only four when Kasner died, and could only just remember him.

She said that although Google has bought attention to the name, it has not bought attention to Kasner?s work. Google was not using the concepts, but just capitalising on the name, she said. And who is the heir to Kasner's work? Step forward Fleisher's son, who has the rights to the book.

She said she had written to Google but it had never replied. She said that Google is playing off that number and not compensating them even a little bit. Ethically, it could have been more giving. She does not want cash just the opportunity to operate as insiders for the IPO.

Now they are thinking of suing.
 
stupidest thing I read today.
Is googol trademarked or copywritten? If not they should shove it up their .....
 
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
hmm, suprised SCO does not purchase the name googol

no way rambus is going to submit a patent on it for the 3rd time. sure, the first two times they were rejected but the 3rd time's the charm!
 
umm....yeeeah I'm sure people are like "Hmm, what's a good search engine...let's see, I'll just type in the name of a very large number and see what I can find....google! That's it!"

Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
hmm, suprised SCO does not purchase the name googol
if they won't Donald Trump will.
 
Originally posted by: MacBaine
It'll get thrown out faster than a used condom

I know a lady that used to detail cars in Seattle and find odd things stuffed between the console and the seats. Not all condoms get thrown out.
 
Back
Top