you need to buy more shares than that to offset the cost of purchasing the stock. if you buy ten shares at $25 a share, for $250 and pay a $15 commission for buying them, thats 6% of your investment. Further, you'll take another hit when you sell. You are much better to invest in a bond.
EX: let's say your 10 shares @ $25 reach a high of $30 two years later. So now you have $300 in stock and an increase in value of 20%, which is an absolutely huge gain. However, when you buy/sell the stock, you got charged $15 each time, for a total of $30. So your realized gain is $50 - $30 = $20. or an 8% ROI. A person who bought 1,000 shares @ $25 a share would have an 18.8% ROI!!!
Now while an 8% ROI still seems like an excellent investment, this was based on the fact that google goes up 20% in two years. You have to factor in the risk that it might not go up at all or even, go down in price. With all these factors, you much better investing in a cd or if your really interested in stocks, setting up a DRP account.
I see this, but here is a question. What is different about a $1 stock versus a $100 stock if you only have a certain amount to invest. Say John Doe was investing $1000 into stocks. He says, "If google had been lower priced, I would have bought some of that." John Doe is only investing $1,000 at the moment regardless of share prices. So, if John Doe really liked Google for some reason, the price shouldn't affect his decision if he only has so much to spend anyway?
