- Mar 9, 2005
- 16,253
- 4,927
- 136
Its that anger combined with high capacity magazines that concerns me.Lol, he mad.
If they'd hacked the official page for the business then they should be subject to the laws governing such an act but they did not.But they have algorithms. But they aren't biased.
Oh wait the google chief is a big Clinton buddy... he wouldn't use that power rig his system towards the left would he? hmm, everyone else in the media seemed to run their stories past the Clintons, so why wouldn't google to the same with their products.
The left is so childish.
You do realize that there are anger management classes available to help with your issues?I guess people think it's funny that someone defaced the map to the President of the United States home. Immature little bastards. This shit might have flown under Obama, but it will be quickly reigned in with Trump. Time for America to have a no bullshit man in charge.
I guess people think it's funny that someone defaced the map to the President of the United States home. Immature little bastards. This shit might have flown under Obama, but it will be quickly reigned in with Trump. Time for America to have a no bullshit man in charge.
I guess people think it's funny that someone defaced the map to the President of the United States home. Immature little bastards. This shit might have flown under Obama, but it will be quickly reigned in with Trump. Time for America to have a no bullshit man in charge.
I guess people think it's funny that someone defaced the map to the President of the United States home. Immature little bastards. This shit might have flown under Obama, but it will be quickly reigned in with Trump. Time for America to have a no bullshit man in charge.
how exactly is defacing a privately owned map free speech?Yeah, how dare you have free speech that criticizes a political leader. Conform. Submit. Obey.
how exactly is defacing a privately owned map free speech?
Pardon me but the bad puns are my specialty. Please stay in your lane. Thank you.I guess people think it's funny that someone defaced the map to the President of the United States home. Immature little bastards. This shit might have flown under Obama, but it will be quickly reigned in with Trump. Time for America to have a no bullshit man in charge.
I look forward to our new dictatorship.I guess people think it's funny that someone defaced the map to the President of the United States home. Immature little bastards. This shit might have flown under Obama, but it will be quickly reigned in with Trump. Time for America to have a no bullshit man in charge.
oooh you go get 'em billy badass.I guess people think it's funny that someone defaced the map to the President of the United States home. Immature little bastards. This shit might have flown under Obama, but it will be quickly reigned in with Trump. Time for America to have a no bullshit man in charge.
I guess people think it's funny that someone defaced the map to the President of the United States home. Immature little bastards. This shit might have flown under Obama, but it will be quickly reigned in with Trump. Time for America to have a no bullshit man in charge.
doubt its a hack, but its something google allowed.Google allows crowdsourcing for some map info. The odds are that this isn't a hack, and was technically allowed. It may have been childish and not what Google intended, but it was very likely legal -- just as Google is allowed to change it back or prevent people from changing it.
The problem is that compuwiz1 doesn't seem interested in whether or not Google gives permission. His beef appears to be with the very act of making fun of the President. Sorry, compuwiz1, but the US was founded on the idea that you're allowed to express dissatisfaction with your leaders. Just because you worship the ground Trump walks on doesn't make that any less true.
dafuq are you on about? the implications made by using Obama's full name were obvious to anyone with more than a double digit IQdoubt its a hack, but its something google allowed.
The left has no problems attacking trump, using stupid 'dump trump' memes etc etc. But they got all upset when someone uses obama's full name. That was bad, you cannot use the presidents middle name.
doubt its a hack, but its something google allowed.
The left has no problems attacking trump, using stupid 'dump trump' memes etc etc. But they got all upset when someone uses obama's full name. That was bad, you cannot use the presidents middle name.
Hey hey hey, 3 syllables or less, please.dafuq are you on about? the implications made by using Obama's full name were obvious to anyone with more than a double digit IQ
I don't mind someone saying Barack Hussein Obama. However, it's genuinely, unquestionably stupid when someone says that middle name with contempt or fear, as if merely having an Arab middle name makes you an Islamic terrorist sympathizer. That was why people got upset -- it's not the mention, it's the obviously malicious, frequently bigoted motivations behind mentioning that name. How dare someone with the vaguest of Middle Eastern connections run our country... even though he was born in Hawaii and is demonstrably Christian (and a moderate Christian at that).
You're equivocating here: that if you object to criticism of Obama, you must also object to criticism of Trump. Well, no. That falsely assumes that all criticism is equally valid (or invalid), and that the politicians are roughly the same. I'm sorry, but some (certainly not all) of the attacks levelled against Obama stemmed from Islamophobia, if not outright racism, and had no basis in fact. Like it or not, Trump is a pretty easy target: he's clueless about politics, thin-skinned, an unsubtle liar and a champion of discriminatory policies. People are criticizing Trump almost exclusively for his actions, not his religion (actual or imagined) or skin color... well, natural skin color, anyway.
Hey hey hey, 3 syllables or less, please.
