uOpt
Golden Member
- Oct 19, 2004
- 1,628
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Orre
Originally posted by: Arcanedeath
Nothing is wrong w/ your system if you want top of the line, but as CheesePoofs suggested you could go w/ slightly lesser parts and not lose that much performance but save tons of cash. as an FYI I'd go w/ only 2GB of Ram as 4 sticks forces you to go to a 2T CMD rate which is a bad thing, otherwise everything looks good.
Edit: also as an FYI I would not do raid 5 unless you have a card w/ write cache, it's write performance w/out a cacheing controler is truely aweful (worse than a single drive in most cases) I'd suggest raid 0+1 if your going w/ 4 drives or add an Areca ARC-1120 (broadcom based) card or LSI Logic Megaraid based Sata raid card w/ at least 64mb of cache.
So if i choose to change the raid controller card to a Promise SATA150 Fasttrak RAID SX4M 64MB i would be a wise man?
And i guess 4gb of ram is overkill, but 2gb i need, that is what i have right now and some of our inhouse apps need 2gb ram to run.I'm currently looking at these:
4x 512mb - OCZ EL DDR PC-5000 Dual Channel Platinum DFI nF4 Special
2x 1gb - OCZ DDR PC-3200 2GB Dual Channel
Someone said that useing all 4 slots is a bad idea.... but they are alot faster? right?
The PC5000 RAM is ony faster if you overclock, otherwise it is used as PC3200. I don't think you want to do that on a development machine. And same thing, using 4 slots in a socket 939 (at least before Venice) sets you back at PC2700 as a starting point, no matter what your chips do.
I don't have experience with recent RAID controller (doing software RAID exclusively), but before getting one you want to watch the details very closely and spend 2 days hunting down forums and mailing lists of people who use that controller.
