Good overclock on faster it goes

Crusty

Lifer
Sep 30, 2001
12,684
2
81
Originally posted by: CreativeTom
I needed edit....it's around at 2.84Ghz now for a while.

Sounds like you needed english more then you needed edit
 

NiKeFiDO

Diamond Member
May 21, 2004
3,901
1
76
Originally posted by: MCrusty
Originally posted by: CreativeTom
I needed edit....it's around at 2.84Ghz now for a while.

Sounds like you needed english more then you needed edit

in soviet russia, edit.....nevermind, this is too dumb
 

CreativeTom

Banned
May 10, 2005
1,092
0
0
Originally posted by: NiKeFiDO
Originally posted by: MCrusty
Originally posted by: CreativeTom
I needed edit....it's around at 2.84Ghz now for a while.

Sounds like you needed english more then you needed edit

in soviet russia, edit.....nevermind, this is too dumb


Why dum for that, not really about when it's working....it goes fast

UPDATE----up to 2.92 stable!!!!!with not lonr on yet relise it
 

imported_Pressure

Senior member
Jun 9, 2005
200
0
0
No see you gotta think from his logic. When you overclock something you make it slower you the original clock is over the new clock, thus overclocked. It doesn't make sense but neither does he.
 

Elcs

Diamond Member
Apr 27, 2002
6,278
6
81
Originally posted by: Pressure
No see you gotta think from his logic. When you overclock something you make it slower you the original clock is over the new clock, thus overclocked. It doesn't make sense but neither does he.

Erm? Im awake and dont get that.

I think his clock does 2.92 seconds per second.
 

CreativeTom

Banned
May 10, 2005
1,092
0
0
Originally posted by: Elcs
Originally posted by: Pressure
No see you gotta think from his logic. When you overclock something you make it slower you the original clock is over the new clock, thus overclocked. It doesn't make sense but neither does he.

Erm? Im awake and dont get that.

I think his clock does 2.92 seconds per second.


nope...