- Oct 30, 2000
- 42,589
- 5
- 0
Maybe I should have phrased my post better, regardless if the Mullahs of Iran fall or not, the Iranian people will remain committed to a peaceful nuclear energy electrical conversion for Iran.
As it is, its only the USA and Israel that are still in a snit about losing a corrupt Shah of Iran.
And now danger danger danger for the USA, a new mid-east liberation movement may even bring down the House of Faud in Saudi Arabia before all is done. As for Iraq, any stability there is there is far wider than it is deep. As for Iran, its set its own foreign policy despite a 30 year effort of the USA and Israel to wreck Iran.
But ironically, Iran is not really a part of the Mid-East, Iran is Persian and Shiite, and Iran's future is really towards the East, for the vast Natural gas markets of the India economy. As for Iran at this point in time, after cementing alliances with Syria, and Turkey, as a side issue, why should not Iran have a small naval presence in the Mediterranean sea? As a naval power, Iran is a pipsqueak, but it shows Iran in in solidarity with mid-east regime change. Meanwhile back at the Iranian ranch, the Mullah's of Iran may be the next regime to fall.
But if Iran build a pipeline To India, it may be in US interests, as it will bail the USA out of problems in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Isreal has been concerned about Iran in that it support those that strike against Israel.
If Iran stopped supporting/encouraging Syria/Hezbolah and Hamas; tensions would be reduced.
Also, it has been the Iranian leadership that is verbally spouting about destruction of Israel; it is not Israel that talks abouit the destruction of Iran.
