brycejones
Lifer
- Oct 18, 2005
- 29,098
- 29,241
- 136
Exactly we can tell
I didn't vote for any Democrats.
Exactly we can tell
I didn't vote for any Democrats.
I'm not voting for someone that is for late term abortions up until the due date that is for damn sure.
It is impossible to write a law banning abortion except for medically unviable reasons while giving doctors final authority on what is viable or not. You either give power to the lawmakers to define what is unviable or you give it to the doctors, any attempted "middle" ground will inevitably create situations where doctors are afraid to perform abortions for the fear of their license taken away. If you want to give the final word to the doctor on what's viable and what is not, well, that is exactly what is happening now.I am not a You People. Doctors should have the final word on what is required not a lawmaker. If this was written into law the issue would be solved.
Find me 2 people that carry a fetus up to 36 weeks and decide to have an abortion just because.I'm not voting for someone that is for late term abortions up until the due date that is for damn sure.
CorrectSo did pcgeek argue against himself, again?
doctors should have the final say, but he won’t vote for someone who would allow 3rd trimester procedures?
Apparently at least some conservatives believe this is a thing, I just heard about an argument at the dinner table between my daughter and son-in-law and his parents (that the parents started, mind you), and they were all "well, what if she's 39 weeks pregnant and decides to go to California to get an abortion?!?" thinking it would bolster their argument. The kids were flabbergasted that they think this is a real thing. They love their Fox News, of course, it's the only reputable news source.Find me 2 people that carry a fetus up to 36 weeks and decide to have an abortion just because.
Find me 2 doctors who would perform such an abortion under those circumstances.
That's out of almost 35M women of child bearing age and 22.6K OBGYNs
With those numbers I can safely say that isn't going to happen
It is impossible to write a law banning abortion except for medically unviable reasons while giving doctors final authority on what is viable or not. You either give power to the lawmakers to define what is unviable or you give it to the doctors, any attempted "middle" ground will inevitably create situations where doctors are afraid to perform abortions for the fear of their license taken away. If you want to give the final word to the doctor on what's viable and what is not, well, that is exactly what is happening now.
As has been told you multiple times in this thread, abortion in this country is already working the way you say you want it to work. Abortion is (well, was) legal everywhere until third trimester which is a scientifically established viability threshold. Third trimester abortions are illegal except for medical reasons in majority of the states. In the handful of states where third trimester abortions are legal the doctor is not obligated to provide abortion services, they can and do refuse third trimester abortions unless they believe it is medically necessary.
The system already works the way you say you want it to work. Or, well, it worked, until GOP broke it.
That was fine. But we are currently in the present where that is no longer the case.
NOW each State must create the laws for their State. That is all I said then stated what my opinion was. Then everybody has to bring in their 2 cents and tell me how fucked up I am and it is my fault (and people like me) that they had to face hardships with abortions and it's none of my business.....
It was the Supreme Court that overturned Roe not the GOP.
That was fine. But we are currently in the present where that is no longer the case.
NOW each State must create the laws for their State. That is all I said then stated what my opinion was. Then everybody has to bring in their 2 cents and tell me how fucked up I am and it is my fault (and people like me) that they had to face hardships with abortions and it's none of my business.....
It was the Supreme Court that overturned Roe not the GOP.
It was the Supreme Court that overturned Roe not the GOP.
Right, but in this case it's the state that's legislating nontraditional medicine.It depends on a lot of factors. In general if you have a child that has an illness that is diagnosed by a doctor and they are informed that without treatment that the child may die. Then if they abstain or do nothing then the child dies at a minimum they should be charged with negligent homicide.
Yea but Trump said the evil liberals were slaughtering newborn babies, and pcgeek can't be a party to that.Right, but in this case it's the state that's legislating nontraditional medicine.
States were already allowed to set their policies within the Federal guidelines.
That doesn't change the fact that we are where we are currently.
#Youdealwithit
I give up. You fuckers are hopeless.
classic geek, many people are saying 😉
I give up. You fuckers are hopeless.
Apparently at least some conservatives believe this is a thing, I just heard about an argument at the dinner table between my daughter and son-in-law and his parents (that the parents started, mind you), and they were all "well, what if she's 39 weeks pregnant and decides to go to California to get an abortion?!?" thinking it would bolster their argument. The kids were flabbergasted that they think this is a real thing. They love their Fox News, of course, it's the only reputable news source.
Every accusation is a confession.I give up. You fuckers are hopeless.