Goldman Sachs Loses Grip on Its Doomsday Machine:

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: JSt0rm01
Originally posted by: Darthvoy
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: NaughtyGeek
Low and behold, look who's fixing to report record profits following on the heels of disaster.


Linkage

It can't hurt having friends in high places.

exactly... the Obama administration is littered with wall street invesmtent bankers. Why no outrage I wonder? If it was any other time in history, I think we would have held them to the stake.

you mean like all the big business deregulation defense contractor ass fuck of the last 8 years? Yeah we were all up in arms about that weren't we :confused:
Of course how many big bucks Defense contracts were canceled/rebid in the last 8 years?
How many contracts are on the chopping block right now that Gates identified under Bush

 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Doomsday device my ass, goldman was just worried that if they don't make it uber dramatic, FBI won't get him on time and their IP will be lost.

It's not as if you can use the system pretending that you're goldman sachs and move markets. You'd need a shitload of capital to replicate what they were doing it, besides low latency (I mean LOW) FIX pipelines to the exchanges.

Translation of the story: "catch him before we lose all the work from a quant team that we have to pay 7 figures a year"

I bet he just jacked the black box order routing system and basically effed over the prime brokerage.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: halik
Doomsday device my ass, goldman was just worried that if they don't make it uber dramatic, FBI won't get him on time and their IP will be lost.

It's not as if you can use the system pretending that you're goldman sachs and move markets. You'd need a shitload of capital to replicate what they were doing it, besides low latency (I mean LOW) FIX pipelines to the exchanges.

Translation of the story: "catch him before we lose all the work from a quant team that we have to pay 7 figures a year"

I bet he just jacked the black box order routing system and basically effed over the prime brokerage.

Government Sachs didn't want it getting out how rigid the stock market is. Only they should be allowed to "manipulate markets in unfair ways.?
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: halik
Doomsday device my ass, goldman was just worried that if they don't make it uber dramatic, FBI won't get him on time and their IP will be lost.

It's not as if you can use the system pretending that you're goldman sachs and move markets. You'd need a shitload of capital to replicate what they were doing it, besides low latency (I mean LOW) FIX pipelines to the exchanges.

Translation of the story: "catch him before we lose all the work from a quant team that we have to pay 7 figures a year"

I bet he just jacked the black box order routing system and basically effed over the prime brokerage.

Government Sachs didn't want it getting out how rigid the stock market is. Only they should be allowed to "manipulate markets in unfair ways.?


Anyone with enough capital can "manipulate markets in unfair ways." This is not related to theft of a black box trading system in anyway; they're just worried that either someone will jack their order routing algorithms or take positions against them.

If you can analyze how the machine will trade given a scenario, you can create the scenario (with enough capital) and make goldman lose a bunch of money. That or just emulates the strategy and eat up all the alpha.

Goldman doesn't do anything different than any of the other players or quant hedge funds for that matter. They just don't want to have their cards on the table.

<- Ex-goldman analyst. And no, it's not a jewish conspiracy to take over the world.
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: halik
Doomsday device my ass, goldman was just worried that if they don't make it uber dramatic, FBI won't get him on time and their IP will be lost.

It's not as if you can use the system pretending that you're goldman sachs and move markets. You'd need a shitload of capital to replicate what they were doing it, besides low latency (I mean LOW) FIX pipelines to the exchanges.

Translation of the story: "catch him before we lose all the work from a quant team that we have to pay 7 figures a year"

I bet he just jacked the black box order routing system and basically effed over the prime brokerage.

Government Sachs didn't want it getting out how rigid the stock market is. Only they should be allowed to "manipulate markets in unfair ways.?


Anyone with enough capital can "manipulate markets in unfair ways." This is not related to theft of a black box trading system in anyway; they're just worried that either someone will jack their order routing algorithms or take positions against them.

If you can analyze how the machine will trade given a scenario, you can create the scenario (with enough capital) and make goldman lose a bunch of money. That or just emulates the strategy and eat up all the alpha.

Goldman doesn't do anything different than any of the other players or quant hedge funds for that matter. They just don't want to have their cards on the table.

<- Ex-goldman analyst. And no, it's not a jewish conspiracy to take over the world.

So goldman is trying to get the government to do its dirty work? Why else would they exaggerate the consequences if the program were stolen?
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Because FBI is the agency that handles thefts of corporate secrets? It is a criminal matter after all and I'm sure FBI along with SEC are the ones dealing with it.

If nothing more, it can lead to insider trading.

Plus if goldman had/was doing something illegal, I'm sure they wouldn't publicly announce that someone stole their illegal machine.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: halik
Because FBI is the agency that handles thefts of corporate secrets? It is a criminal matter after all and I'm sure FBI along with SEC are the ones dealing with it.

If nothing more, it can lead to insider trading.

Plus if goldman had/was doing something illegal, I'm sure they wouldn't publicly announce that someone stole their illegal machine.

No they just have the Nixon philosophy it isn't illegal when Government Sachs does it..
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: halik
Because FBI is the agency that handles thefts of corporate secrets? It is a criminal matter after all and I'm sure FBI along with SEC are the ones dealing with it.

If nothing more, it can lead to insider trading.

Plus if goldman had/was doing something illegal, I'm sure they wouldn't publicly announce that someone stole their illegal machine.

No they just have the Nixon philosophy it isn't illegal when Government Sachs does it..

:roll:

So i don't suppose you have anything cogent to add to the discussion then?
 

Dr. Zaus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2008
11,764
347
126

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
The software is in plain sight.

Anyone have a bank account?

Look at the interest the last year.

The banks are making a killing while actually doing negative interest on U.S. customers.
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
Originally posted by: DixyCrat
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Harabec

Is this real?

Yeah if you get your economics and credit cycle information from a guy that writes satire for rolling stone.

Buy this if you want to a historical perspective on the credit cycle bubbles.

Predictably Irrational is an entertaining read.

Here's the latest:

For Goldman, a Swift Return to Lofty Profits

In particular:

"On Wall Street, where money is the ultimate measure, Goldman is both revered and reviled. Its bankers and traders are sometimes referred to as the Bandits of Broad Street. An executive at a rival bank characterized Goldman traders as ?orcs,? the warlike creatures of Middle Earth in Tolkien?s ?The Lord of the Rings.?

Even mainstream America is taking notice. An article about Goldman in a recent issue of Rolling Stone, by Matt Taibbi, characterized Goldman as ?a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.? Goldman dismissed the article as the ramblings of conspiracy theorists."

Frankly I don't begrudge these geniuses their money, but when there's a revolving door connecting their offices and the Treasury, it should give one pause about conflict of interest, especially when some of it's competitors were blown away by Hank Paulson, a Goldman Sachs alumnus.