Gold in faeces 'worth millions'

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
13,726
2,253
126
there's gold in seawater too, but it just doesn't pay trying to extract it.
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
I'm still not understanding how this works...

sounds like bullshit. I get so frustrated with news articles that leave out the most important pieces of information, like how the fuck there is gold in our shit.
 

Arcadio

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2007
5,637
24
81
Didn't you guys learn anything from Chemistry/Biology? Almost every element is found in your body because everything you eat can be traced back to the soil, so essentially when you eat food you're really eating organized soil with some potential energy stored in it.
 
Last edited:

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
Didn't you guys learn anything from Chemistry/Biology? Almost every element is found in your body because everything you eat can be traced back to the soil, so essentially when you eat food you're really eating organized soil with some potential energy stored in it.

They said that it was "almost" at the levels miner would consider worth mining. The would would have to be glittering for your theory to make any sense. How about we mine it from the soil the food came from in the first place?

If it is legit then it is probably from people swallowing bits of jewelry or dropping earrings and such in the drain.
 

RGUN

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2005
1,007
3
76
Looking more into it, the media and pop science reports are full of shit as usual.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es505329q

$280 per ton, including all metals (not just gold).

I don't think you have an appreciation for just how little gold there can be in one ton of material for it to be economically recoverable - conversely, I would imagine that you have no idea how much earth must be disturbed to get enough gold for a ring/necklace/etc.
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
I don't think you have an appreciation for just how little gold there can be in one ton of material for it to be economically recoverable - conversely, I would imagine that you have no idea how much earth must be disturbed to get enough gold for a ring/necklace/etc.

so you think people are going to start mining waste for gold? because they aren't.

perhaps eventually it could be worked into bill gates' waste into water initiative, but no one is going to start buying shit in bulk
 

RGUN

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2005
1,007
3
76
so you think people are going to start mining waste for gold? because they aren't.

perhaps eventually it could be worked into bill gates' waste into water initiative, but no one is going to start buying shit in bulk

I didn't say that anywhere in my statement, but if you think $280 worth of minerals in one ton of material isn't significant, I would say that you are wrong. The proportions are what is important, if 1/10th of that is gold, or any one mineral, we can start having a conversation.
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
I didn't say that anywhere in my statement, but if you think $280 worth of minerals in one ton of material isn't significant, I would say that you are wrong. The proportions are what is important, if 1/10th of that is gold, or any one mineral, we can start having a conversation.

If there was $280 worth of gold in a ton of waste, I still don't think it would be "economically recoverable"
 

RGUN

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2005
1,007
3
76
If there was $280 worth of gold in a ton of waste, I still don't think it would be "economically recoverable"

I would make the same statement here. I don't think you have an appreciation for how little gold is required to present an economically recoverable resource.
 

Rakehellion

Lifer
Jan 15, 2013
12,181
35
91
gold-pills.jpg
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
how come science doesn't know how to create gold from other elements?

Think about that word for a second. "Element." Yeah. "Element."

You can't make an element from another element without fusion, fission, or radioactive decay. That's why we call it an "element." Elements are the elemental building blocks of all other compounds. It's why we call them "elements." Their "building blocks" are sub-atomic particles.
 
Last edited:

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
I would make the same statement here. I don't think you have an appreciation for how little gold is required to present an economically recoverable resource.

do you know that 1 pound of feathers is just as heavy as 1 pound of rocks?