• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

God is a woman

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
If god was a woman then everyone would be receiving a $3000 a month welfare check and no one would need to wonder about how to pay for it.
 
swamplizard said:
Maybe everyone does.
Click to expand...

Perhaps. One could certainly argue that if you were to take any peasant from medieval times and plant them into any of today's housing projects or even a homeless shelter, they would say they are now living like a king. And the medieval peasant would no doubt wonder why people are not happier given all that they have.
 
sm625 said:
Perhaps. One could certainly argue that if you were to take any peasant from medieval times and plant them into any of today's housing projects or even a homeless shelter, they would say they are now living like a king. And the medieval peasant would no doubt wonder why people are not happier given all that they have.
Click to expand...

Hi sm,

Wealth, like all else in this existence, is relative.
 
I am reminded once again of that scene from a Star Trek movie. Kirk asks "What does God need with a starship?" For that matter, what does God need with genetalia? How could a supreme being even be bothered with genetalia? Why would an immortal being require genetalia when genetalia are symbols of reproduction, and reproduction itself is a symptom of mortality?
 
Hi sm,

You are taking this topic way too seriously. It is symbolic and offers a non-traditional way of looking at God. Relax, and let the story unwind in your inner self.
 
God is androgynous, i thought we all already knew this...

the baphomet, the plant life, how most species are androgynous with very few remaining homogeneous, i'd imagine we were past this...

at least on this forum.
 
swamplizard said:
Ave',

The first human was a woman, let's call her Eve. She gave birth to Adam and Lilith in the same fashion as some amphibians (see: http://www.ansci.wisc.edu/jjp1/ansci_repro/misc/websites09/tues/amphibians/Amphibian Reproduction2.html ).

God is an infinite number of entities within one God, the dominant entity is female and gave birth to an infinite universe, or multiverse if you prefer.

The Garden of Eden is real and can be entered by anyone anytime that one wishes to lay aside the false notion(s) that Eve's descendants are obstructed from it by guardians that refuse to allow admittance. The guards are but a mental construct, constricting the descendants within a realm of fantasy.

God is the ultimate Female, pure and loving all of Her creation, that includes you.
Click to expand...
Well, this is far too structured for my taste. God is more than any of those things, a lot more, and a lot more than anything you have ever thought.
 
Without reading all of the crap... I'll just say God isn't a woman, but is noted as the father of Jesus. But I think God is a male-like creature in this respect. Not human as we are.
 
What it is that we would consider or call a God very likely is unaware of our existence if it's even self aware at all. It would be like saying Dark Energy is self aware but yet it's still something that would exist and by doing so has an effect such as causing our universe to expand. I suspect "God" is likely a culmination of things in another dimension that thanks to its existence, forms our laws of physics in our dimension which allowed us to even be possible. No doubt because of our existence, we cause a ripple effect throughout other dimensions that we'll never know about.
 
Would it be possible that God created the first being as a female to essentially be the fertile one, to create offspring? A man certainly cannot, perhaps this might sound strange but God's first intention might not have been human to human procreation.
 
RiverStream said:
Would it be possible that God created the first being as a female to essentially be the fertile one, to create offspring? A man certainly cannot, perhaps this might sound strange but God's first intention might not have been human to human procreation.
Click to expand...


Male creatures all have unnecessary tits.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top