News GN covers Microcenter Exclusive AMD Ryzen 5600X3D

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,403
16,253
136
If that happens, does AMD have a contingency plan? Some secret architecture they are holding back on, to unleash only when things get too hairy? That's my big question :p
With all the hype on Zen 5 ? Not worried about that. We need Intel to come back before AMD gets complacent.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,131
3,664
126
Makes me think that this might not be the last AM4 SKU. Although that doesn't necessairly mean it would be Zen 3D.

I think this is the last cpu...
It makes no sense to continue coming out with more products on a almost EOL socket.
They moved the pins off the cpu and put them on the boards.
It would make no sense to keep making products with pins on the cpu, unless the current socket is bad.

I think there will be a revision of the AM5, like a AM5.5 or something where they balance out the power draw so EXPO doesn't melt your cpu.

But AMD is still learning how to balance out pin arrangement.
Remember it took intel almost 3 generations to get this down as to not melt the CPU socket from too much current draw.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,131
3,664
126
It's not EOL until 2028...

If they still make a AM4 cpu in 2 yrs, you can call me on it...
But it makes little to no financial sense to keep 2 different platforms like that.
At the very least, i don't think board makers will still make AM4 boards to fill for another 5 yrs.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,131
3,664
126
AMD screwed up by not supporting DDR4 on AM5, at least to start.

I completely agree with you on that... lol....
I think its another standard case of trying to put too much improvement out in 1 gen, instead of trying to slowly adapt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Thibsie

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2017
1,180
1,397
136
You'd imagine so. There must be a mechanism that causes the failure of a couple cores while they're assembling it. Maybe parametric with a hot spot issue meaning a core can't reach frequency without overheating?
Probably failed 7900X3D IMO
 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
4,294
7,099
136
If they still make a AM4 cpu in 2 yrs, you can call me on it...
But it makes little to no financial sense to keep 2 different platforms like that.
At the very least, i don't think board makers will still make AM4 boards to fill for another 5 yrs.

I don't think she means new models. Just that at least a few SKU's will still be made.

Probably failed 7900X3D IMO

The 7900X3D never made sense. I don't see the point of vcache on 6 cores.
 

AnitaPeterson

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
6,048
624
126
If they still make a AM4 cpu in 2 yrs, you can call me on it...
But it makes little to no financial sense to keep 2 different platforms like that.
At the very least, i don't think board makers will still make AM4 boards to fill for another 5 yrs.
Remember: AMD kept the FM1 and FM2 socket CPUs in parallel with -- and as a cost-conscious alternative to -- AM3.

And at this point, considering the difference in DDR/architecture, they could very well keep AM4 as a budget option, while offering AM5 to gamers and people who absolutely need the latest and greatest, regardless of costs (and power consumption), for the sake of bragging rights.
 
Last edited:

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,694
3,394
136
On AMD keeping AM4 around until 2028... I still think it makes sense to release a refresh of the 5000 series on N6. N7 to N6 migration is supposed to be a "low" effort and "low" cost affair and TSMC is supposedly actively pushing their clients to use it. Moving the Zen3 CCDs to N6 would allow for higher all-core boosts as it is a friendlier process for power draw and resulting heat dissipation and would likely make a notable improvement for the 5900X and 5950X parts. No need to change anything else about them.
 

Shivansps

Diamond Member
Sep 11, 2013
3,918
1,570
136
If they still make a AM4 cpu in 2 yrs, you can call me on it...
But it makes little to no financial sense to keep 2 different platforms like that.
At the very least, i don't think board makers will still make AM4 boards to fill for another 5 yrs.
AMD released the A6-7480 and A8-7680 for FM2+ in 2018. The 2400G and 2200G were already in the streets for almost a year when that happened. So it is totally possible if they are sitting on top of unsold silicon.

The problem they are going to have here is the DDR4.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,131
3,664
126
The problem they are going to have here is the DDR4.

Yeah... but also note, that board makers were not really cut dry in cost saving back then.
Quality was better on boards as well.

Now quality is all over the place, and i don't think a vendor wants to waste resources making a 150 dollar board when they can make a 400 dollar one with almost the same cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GodisanAtheist

Shivansps

Diamond Member
Sep 11, 2013
3,918
1,570
136
Yeah... but also note, that board makers were not really cut dry in cost saving back then.
Quality was better on boards as well.

Now quality is all over the place, and i don't think a vendor wants to waste resources making a 150 dollar board when they can make a 400 dollar one with almost the same cost.
In fact the problem with the 7480 and 7680 were that all boards were EOL except for 3 that were still in production and those were the boards that got the bios update for those cpus.

AM4 is still petty much alive, A520 and B550 still are, A320 just got killed 3 months ago not sure about B450, i think AM4 still has about 2 more years. AMD depends on it for the low end. With that in mind i would not be suprised if they launch another Ryzen 3/Athlon on it, maybe a refresh of the APU line.
 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
4,294
7,099
136
In fact the problem with the 7480 and 7680 were that all boards were EOL except for 3 that were still in production and those were the boards that got the bios update for those cpus.

AM4 is still petty much alive, A520 and B550 still are, A320 just got killed 3 months ago not sure about B450, i think AM4 still has about 2 more years. AMD depends on it for the low end. With that in mind i would not be suprised if they launch another Ryzen 3/Athlon on it, maybe a refresh of the APU line.

I just found a BIOS update for my B450 that is little more than a month old.
 

Shivansps

Diamond Member
Sep 11, 2013
3,918
1,570
136
I just found a BIOS update for my B450 that is little more than a month old.
Yes all motherboards are still supported so far as i know, i was talking about production, the A320 production ended recently, not sure what is the current status of B450, as far as i know, AMD want to keep only the A520 in production.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,529
7,795
136
So there would the be some defective CCDs included.

But low end SKU generally include working parts gimped to match demand for various product segments. AMD isn't planning to do that for the 5600X3D for some reason.

The yields for TSMC 7nm were already amazing when Zen 3 first launched. I don't recall the exact figures, but something like 97% or better yield. If the node has continued to mature, it wouldn't be too surprising for the yield to be even better by now.

Of the defective dies, some can no doubt be salvaged by turning off a core, but others will be junk due to a defect in something that doesn't have redundancy.

Most of the time you get a six core chiplet it's because it can't hit specific clock speeds on all of the cores at the desired voltages. With v-cache the clock speeds aren't going to be as high anyways and so the number of dies that couldn't make the cut would be a lot lower.

If AMD were using only dies that had an actually defective core, it's not surprising that it took them a while to stockpile enough to do even a special launch like this.
 

Hans Gruber

Platinum Member
Dec 23, 2006
2,542
1,371
136
The yields for TSMC 7nm were already amazing when Zen 3 first launched. I don't recall the exact figures, but something like 97% or better yield. If the node has continued to mature, it wouldn't be too surprising for the yield to be even better by now.

Of the defective dies, some can no doubt be salvaged by turning off a core, but others will be junk due to a defect in something that doesn't have redundancy.

Most of the time you get a six core chiplet it's because it can't hit specific clock speeds on all of the cores at the desired voltages. With v-cache the clock speeds aren't going to be as high anyways and so the number of dies that couldn't make the cut would be a lot lower.

If AMD were using only dies that had an actually defective core, it's not surprising that it took them a while to stockpile enough to do even a special launch like this.
They are all defective 2x CCD silicon. They have one defective CCD and one that passes the binning process. The 5600x3d only needs one functional CCD. So they are from premium failed 8 core CPU's or higher. I think the baseline of failed CCD's would be the 5800x.
 
Jul 27, 2020
28,174
19,218
146
Wow. LOVE 5600X3D!!!

MS Flight Simulator performance is awesome!

Beats the 7600X in some games and almost keeps up with it in others.

It's like a farewell gift to AM4 owners, thanking them for their loyalty.

Imagine someone on the original Zen, being able to upgrade to this CPU and get the baseline AM5 gaming performance for a fraction of the price. Simply beautiful!


1688651523061.png