• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

GM will not advertise in this year's superbowl

Status
Not open for further replies.

ThePresence

Elite Member
Right after pulling ads from facebook:

http://blogs.wsj.com/drivers-seat/2012/05/21/gm-super-bowl-spots-not-worth-the-cost/

Even though it has touted the value of Super Bowl advertising and spent heavily on it in the last two years, General Motors Co. said it will skip the big game in 2013, in part because running television spots costs too much.

“We understand the reach the Super Bowl provides, but with the significant increase in price, we simply can’t justify the expense,” said GM’s marketing chief Joel Ewanick in a statement.

Ewanick, who built a formidable reputation with other car makers including Hyundai and Porsche before joining GM, is known for surprising moves, and this was his second such maneuver in a week. Last Tuesday GM said it would stop buying ads on Facebook, and instead rely on the site’s free content. The car maker said paid ads do not attract enough buyers.

Ad time for last season’s game in February cost about $3.5 million for 30 seconds, according to media buyers, and have risen about 59% since 2001, when a spot sold for roughly $2.2 million. Spots for the next year’s game are expected to cost about $3.8 million for 30 seconds, the buyers said.

GM is the third largest Super Bowl advertisers, following Anheuser-Busch InBev and PepsiCo Inc. and has shelled out about $82 million on Super Bowl ad time between 2002-2011, according to Kantar Media, an ad-tracking firm owned by WPP PLC.

GM pulled out of the Super Bowl in 2009 amid the company’s financial crisis and returned two years later with a string of spots promoting its bread-and-butter Chevrolet brand.
 
When you reach the level of American institution you really don't need to advertise anymore. Companies like GM, McDonald's, Toys R Us, etc are basically a part of our culture now so we don't need to be reminded they are there. If GM had spent all this advertising money on keeping their factories in America open we all probably would have been better off.
 
The car maker said paid ads do not attract enough buyers.
Decent cars attract buyers more than paid ads. Luckily, they are making more decent cars now than they were a decade ago.
 
When you reach the level of American institution you really don't need to advertise anymore. Companies like GM, McDonald's, Toys R Us, etc are basically a part of our culture now so we don't need to be reminded they are there. If GM had spent all this advertising money on keeping their factories in America open we all probably would have been better off.

Pepsi, Coke & Budweiser disagree.
 
Pepsi, Coke & Budweiser disagree.

That's the only way for terrible products that offer little/no value; it must be so pervasively drilled into our heads that it becomes an unconscious decision to reach for some at the store.

Bad consumables can only sell well if they advertise so heavily that you don't really understand why you are thinking you want it, but must have it anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top