• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

GM seeks deep cuts in white-collar ranks

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Can some one explain to me why GM (and other automakers) just dump the UAW and hire non-unionized people? Or form another union with better people and better rules?

I fail to see how the employees can strangle a large company like GM?

This whole paying $60Billion for retirees is bullshit! I was reading in hte paper that in 2001 their expenditure in taht area was in teh millions....and now it shot up to the billions!

Someoen is scamming them.

http://www.detnews.com/2004/autosinsider/0403/11/a01-88813.htm

http://www.businessword.com/index.php/weblog/comments/870/
 
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Can some one explain to me why GM (and other automakers) just dump the UAW and hire non-unionized people? Or form another union with better people and better rules?

I fail to see how the employees can strangle a large company like GM?

This whole paying $60Billion for retirees is bullshit! I was reading in hte paper that in 2001 their expenditure in taht area was in teh millions....and now it shot up to the billions!

Someoen is scamming them.

Because the company can't run without all it's employees. If all the employees leave, who is there to train new people? Forming a new union won't work, because eventually they'll say, "The old union did this..." Anyways, read up on the history of labor unions and you'll understand why they just have to be dealt with.
 
Back
Top