GM Says Many Powertrains Coming

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
http://www.thecarconnection.co...&sid=173&n=156

General Motors says its plans for new engines and transmissions will result in 50 new engine variants and 10 new six-speed automatic transmission variants in the next few years. The company told journalists assembled inFrance on a background event that the engines would include a new turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 that will show up in the 2006 Saab 9-3, and will produce 250 hp of power and 258 lb-ft of torque. The new engine will be produced at Holden's Port Melbourne engine plant, where the related 3.6-liter version of the V-6 is made. GM also has plans for a new 5.3-liter V-8 engine developed specifically for front-drive applications; the transverse V-8 will put out 290 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. The new six-speed transmissions will include gearboxes made for both front- and rear-wheel drive; GM says that by 2008 it will be producing more than one million six-speed transmissions per year. And finally, GM says by 2007 it will have a hybrid system for its SUV V-8 engines that will combine displacement on demand technology with a strong hybrid system to boost the fuel economy of its big SUVs by 25 percent, while retaining towing performance.

5.3 liter transverse V8 with 290/325 in FWD. WTF?
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Originally posted by: NFS4
http://www.thecarconnection.co...&sid=173&n=156

General Motors says its plans for new engines and transmissions will result in 50 new engine variants and 10 new six-speed automatic transmission variants in the next few years. The company told journalists assembled inFrance on a background event that the engines would include a new turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 that will show up in the 2006 Saab 9-3, and will produce 250 hp of power and 258 lb-ft of torque. The new engine will be produced at Holden's Port Melbourne engine plant, where the related 3.6-liter version of the V-6 is made. GM also has plans for a new 5.3-liter V-8 engine developed specifically for front-drive applications; the transverse V-8 will put out 290 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. The new six-speed transmissions will include gearboxes made for both front- and rear-wheel drive; GM says that by 2008 it will be producing more than one million six-speed transmissions per year. And finally, GM says by 2007 it will have a hybrid system for its SUV V-8 engines that will combine displacement on demand technology with a strong hybrid system to boost the fuel economy of its big SUVs by 25 percent, while retaining towing performance.

5.3 liter transvere V8 with only 290HP. WTF?

That doesn't seem that unreasonable, stock LS1 is 5.7L & doesn't get that much more than that, especially in low level configurations (Z28).

Viper GTS
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: NFS4
http://www.thecarconnection.co...&sid=173&n=156

General Motors says its plans for new engines and transmissions will result in 50 new engine variants and 10 new six-speed automatic transmission variants in the next few years. The company told journalists assembled inFrance on a background event that the engines would include a new turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 that will show up in the 2006 Saab 9-3, and will produce 250 hp of power and 258 lb-ft of torque. The new engine will be produced at Holden's Port Melbourne engine plant, where the related 3.6-liter version of the V-6 is made. GM also has plans for a new 5.3-liter V-8 engine developed specifically for front-drive applications; the transverse V-8 will put out 290 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. The new six-speed transmissions will include gearboxes made for both front- and rear-wheel drive; GM says that by 2008 it will be producing more than one million six-speed transmissions per year. And finally, GM says by 2007 it will have a hybrid system for its SUV V-8 engines that will combine displacement on demand technology with a strong hybrid system to boost the fuel economy of its big SUVs by 25 percent, while retaining towing performance.

5.3 liter transvere V8 with only 290HP. WTF?

That doesn't seem that unreasonable, stock LS1 is 5.7L & doesn't get that much more than that, especially in low level configurations (Z28).

Viper GTS

It's not so much the power that I'm concerned with...but that last thing we need are some landbarge V8 FWD sedans plowing around. TORQUE STEER HERE WE COME!!!
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
The Northstar makes 300HP and it doesn't have alot of problems, unlike Nissan.

And Caddy went from FWD to RWD with their new STS. If a sedan is large enough to be able to handle a V8 transversely, it should be RWD anyway.
 

TheAudit

Diamond Member
May 2, 2003
4,194
0
0
Originally posted by: NFS4
http://www.thecarconnection.co...&sid=173&n=156

General Motors says its plans for new engines and transmissions will result in 50 new engine variants and 10 new six-speed automatic transmission variants in the next few years. The company told journalists assembled inFrance on a background event that the engines would include a new turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 that will show up in the 2006 Saab 9-3, and will produce 250 hp of power and 258 lb-ft of torque. The new engine will be produced at Holden's Port Melbourne engine plant, where the related 3.6-liter version of the V-6 is made. GM also has plans for a new 5.3-liter V-8 engine developed specifically for front-drive applications; the transverse V-8 will put out 290 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. The new six-speed transmissions will include gearboxes made for both front- and rear-wheel drive; GM says that by 2008 it will be producing more than one million six-speed transmissions per year. And finally, GM says by 2007 it will have a hybrid system for its SUV V-8 engines that will combine displacement on demand technology with a strong hybrid system to boost the fuel economy of its big SUVs by 25 percent, while retaining towing performance.

5.3 liter transvere V8 with only 290HP. WTF?

5.3 V8 with 325 lb-ft of torque in front wheel drive? WTF?
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: NFS4
http://www.thecarconnection.co...&sid=173&n=156

General Motors says its plans for new engines and transmissions will result in 50 new engine variants and 10 new six-speed automatic transmission variants in the next few years. The company told journalists assembled inFrance on a background event that the engines would include a new turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 that will show up in the 2006 Saab 9-3, and will produce 250 hp of power and 258 lb-ft of torque. The new engine will be produced at Holden's Port Melbourne engine plant, where the related 3.6-liter version of the V-6 is made. GM also has plans for a new 5.3-liter V-8 engine developed specifically for front-drive applications; the transverse V-8 will put out 290 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. The new six-speed transmissions will include gearboxes made for both front- and rear-wheel drive; GM says that by 2008 it will be producing more than one million six-speed transmissions per year. And finally, GM says by 2007 it will have a hybrid system for its SUV V-8 engines that will combine displacement on demand technology with a strong hybrid system to boost the fuel economy of its big SUVs by 25 percent, while retaining towing performance.

5.3 liter transverse V8 with only 290HP in FWD. WTF?

funny how you say 'only' here, but in the next post complain about torque steer.
 
Aug 16, 2001
22,505
4
81
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
The Northstar makes 300HP and it doesn't have alot of problems, unlike Nissan.

And Caddy went from FWD to RWD with their new STS. If a sedan is large enough to be able to handle a V8 transversely, it should be RWD anyway.

A tranversely mounted V8 and RWD doesn't add up. Maybe that was not the point of your post.
 

DougK62

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2001
8,035
6
81
Blah blah blah - that 5.3 V8 isn't the big news. That 2.8T V6 is going to be REALLY hot.

 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
The Northstar makes 300HP and it doesn't have alot of problems, unlike Nissan.

And Caddy went from FWD to RWD with their new STS. If a sedan is large enough to be able to handle a V8 transversely, it should be RWD anyway.

A tranversely mounted V8 and RWD doesn't add up. Maybe that was not the point of your post.

The point of my post is that if a sedan is large enough to handle a V8 transversely (meaning wide enough to accept the V8 transversely and then long enough to balance out the proportions of the car), then it should be RWD (longitudinal) in the first place.

Big Car/V8 = RWD IMHO. Even Cadillac is putting the new Deville on a RWD Sigma chassis
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Originally posted by: NFS4
http://www.thecarconnection.co...&sid=173&n=156

General Motors says its plans for new engines and transmissions will result in 50 new engine variants and 10 new six-speed automatic transmission variants in the next few years. The company told journalists assembled inFrance on a background event that the engines would include a new turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 that will show up in the 2006 Saab 9-3, and will produce 250 hp of power and 258 lb-ft of torque. The new engine will be produced at Holden's Port Melbourne engine plant, where the related 3.6-liter version of the V-6 is made. GM also has plans for a new 5.3-liter V-8 engine developed specifically for front-drive applications; the transverse V-8 will put out 290 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. The new six-speed transmissions will include gearboxes made for both front- and rear-wheel drive; GM says that by 2008 it will be producing more than one million six-speed transmissions per year. And finally, GM says by 2007 it will have a hybrid system for its SUV V-8 engines that will combine displacement on demand technology with a strong hybrid system to boost the fuel economy of its big SUVs by 25 percent, while retaining towing performance.

5.3 liter transverse V8 with 290/325 in FWD. WTF?


oo 25% boost on big suv gas mileage, thats like what 4 mpg?

MIKE
 

DougK62

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2001
8,035
6
81
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Cadillac's 502 was transverse+FWD, so was the Old Toronado.

That's not what I asked. There was a production car that was longitudinal+FWD.

 

DougK62

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2001
8,035
6
81
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Cadillac's 502 was transverse+FWD, so was the Old Toronado.

That's not what I asked. There was a production car that was longitudinal+FWD.

Ah - I remembered. Dodge Intrepid. Weird setup.

 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Originally posted by: DougK62
Blah blah blah - that 5.3 V8 isn't the big news. That 2.8T V6 is going to be REALLY hot.

I don't see why. Saab already has a 2.3 liter 4-cylinder turbo that makes exactly the same horsepower and torque. leave it to GM to require more cylinders and displacement to accomplish what other companies did with less, years ago. oh yeah, it makes its max torque at 1900 RPM, too, so no "torque-less wonder" whining, either.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: NFS4
http://www.thecarconnection.co...&sid=173&n=156

General Motors says its plans for new engines and transmissions will result in 50 new engine variants and 10 new six-speed automatic transmission variants in the next few years. The company told journalists assembled inFrance on a background event that the engines would include a new turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 that will show up in the 2006 Saab 9-3, and will produce 250 hp of power and 258 lb-ft of torque. The new engine will be produced at Holden's Port Melbourne engine plant, where the related 3.6-liter version of the V-6 is made. GM also has plans for a new 5.3-liter V-8 engine developed specifically for front-drive applications; the transverse V-8 will put out 290 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. The new six-speed transmissions will include gearboxes made for both front- and rear-wheel drive; GM says that by 2008 it will be producing more than one million six-speed transmissions per year. And finally, GM says by 2007 it will have a hybrid system for its SUV V-8 engines that will combine displacement on demand technology with a strong hybrid system to boost the fuel economy of its big SUVs by 25 percent, while retaining towing performance.

5.3 liter transvere V8 with only 290HP. WTF?

That doesn't seem that unreasonable, stock LS1 is 5.7L & doesn't get that much more than that, especially in low level configurations (Z28).

Viper GTS

It's not so much the power that I'm concerned with...but that last thing we need are some landbarge V8 FWD sedans plowing around. TORQUE STEER HERE WE COME!!!



I get Torque steer in my 2k4 Impala SS . I could just imagine what it would be like in a V8!

Ausm
 
Aug 16, 2001
22,505
4
81
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: DougK62
Blah blah blah - that 5.3 V8 isn't the big news. That 2.8T V6 is going to be REALLY hot.

I don't see why. Saab already has a 2.3 liter 4-cylinder turbo that makes exactly the same horsepower and torque. leave it to GM to require more cylinders and displacement to accomplish what other companies did with less, years ago. oh yeah, it makes its max torque at 1900 RPM, too, so no "torque-less wonder" whining, either.

The only, and I mean ONLY, reason they put a 6-cyl in the SAAB was the US market. Here a 6-cyl > 4-cyl not matter what. Prestige brands 'require' +6 cylinder engines in the US.
 

SilverTorch

Golden Member
Oct 4, 2000
1,082
0
0
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: NFS4
http://www.thecarconnection.co...&sid=173&n=156

General Motors says its plans for new engines and transmissions will result in 50 new engine variants and 10 new six-speed automatic transmission variants in the next few years. The company told journalists assembled inFrance on a background event that the engines would include a new turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 that will show up in the 2006 Saab 9-3, and will produce 250 hp of power and 258 lb-ft of torque. The new engine will be produced at Holden's Port Melbourne engine plant, where the related 3.6-liter version of the V-6 is made. GM also has plans for a new 5.3-liter V-8 engine developed specifically for front-drive applications; the transverse V-8 will put out 290 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. The new six-speed transmissions will include gearboxes made for both front- and rear-wheel drive; GM says that by 2008 it will be producing more than one million six-speed transmissions per year. And finally, GM says by 2007 it will have a hybrid system for its SUV V-8 engines that will combine displacement on demand technology with a strong hybrid system to boost the fuel economy of its big SUVs by 25 percent, while retaining towing performance.

5.3 liter transvere V8 with only 290HP. WTF?

That doesn't seem that unreasonable, stock LS1 is 5.7L & doesn't get that much more than that, especially in low level configurations (Z28).

Viper GTS

It's not so much the power that I'm concerned with...but that last thing we need are some landbarge V8 FWD sedans plowing around. TORQUE STEER HERE WE COME!!!

It will take GM a few years, but they'll throw an LSD at that trans eventually :p
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Cadillac's 502 was transverse+FWD, so was the Old Toronado.

That's not what I asked. There was a production car that was longitudinal+FWD.

Holy crap was I asleep this morning. I ment longitudinal+FWD. I don't think a big block could fit sideways.
 

Viperoni

Lifer
Jan 4, 2000
11,084
1
71
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: DougK62
Blah blah blah - that 5.3 V8 isn't the big news. That 2.8T V6 is going to be REALLY hot.

I don't see why. Saab already has a 2.3 liter 4-cylinder turbo that makes exactly the same horsepower and torque. leave it to GM to require more cylinders and displacement to accomplish what other companies did with less, years ago. oh yeah, it makes its max torque at 1900 RPM, too, so no "torque-less wonder" whining, either.

Some wierd stigma of turbo's.

Chrysler did them well in the early 90's :)