• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

GM reports $1.1 billion loss as sales sink, costs rise

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Once again, Toyota and Nissan (and I wouldn't be surprised to see good numbers from Honda) are showing Detroit how to run a auto manufacturing business. Toyota reported 21% higher sales from a year ago (a record). Even Toyota's truck division saw a nearly 5% increase in sales.

GM's 7.7% drop in overall vehicle sales (17.2% drop if you consider only their trucks and SUVs) has little to do with UAW or increased pension costs. This is simply a complete failure on the part of GM's management to (a) forecast economic conditions and (b) accurately predict buyer's likes and dislikes. Anybody think GM's new line of big SUVs is going to turn the company around? Let's see a show of hands...Didn't think so. This strategy is further proof that GM's brass just doesn't get it. Or maybe their economists are predicting oil will drop back down to $35/barrel...

 
Originally posted by: MrBond
I don't understand why people claim domestic cars don't last as long as their foreign counterparts. Take care of an American car, and it'll run forever (sure it's going to need parts occasionally, but what car doesn't?). My Dad has over 200,000 miles on his truck, it's about 14 model years old now. I have 157,000 on my 10 year old Blazer. My Mom and Sister both drove vehicles with over 200,000 miles on them until recently (both drive 03-04 Impala's now). I know lots of people driving 10+ year old American cars.

The truth is, there's no reason an American car purchased today won't last as long as a foreign car purchased today if you take care of them both equally. The foreign car might have more resale value after 10 years, but that's it.

You hit the nail on the head with the resale value. I disagree on the reliability argument though. Now granted, if you baby your vehicle in traffic, always shifting at 3 grand, and always driving defensive - which, granted is the way most people drive - your American vehicle will definetely last as long as the Honda or Toyota. The difference is that it will last as long as that Honda that was driven hard, daily.

Just in my experience. I've had to rebuild a tranny on my old 94' trans am after just 60k miles. Granted, I drove that car hard and it had a ton of power, but still. Same with almost all American cars that I've owned. Now bare in mind, that I love working on cars, so it doesn't even bother me that much. Its money though, but all hobbies that are worth doing will cost a lot. But for a daily driver, I would never take my Blazer out and expect no problems.

Hell, I've even seen friends of mine drive around their Honda with half the oil they should have had in it and have no problems. For like 2-3 months, on more then one occasion, my friends old 89' Civic with 150k miles on it. No problems. Now granted, my friend is an idiot for doing that, but once again almost all American car owners are. Just my experience.
 
Originally posted by: flyboy84
Originally posted by: MrBond
I don't understand why people claim domestic cars don't last as long as their foreign counterparts. Take care of an American car, and it'll run forever (sure it's going to need parts occasionally, but what car doesn't?). My Dad has over 200,000 miles on his truck, it's about 14 model years old now. I have 157,000 on my 10 year old Blazer. My Mom and Sister both drove vehicles with over 200,000 miles on them until recently (both drive 03-04 Impala's now). I know lots of people driving 10+ year old American cars.

The truth is, there's no reason an American car purchased today won't last as long as a foreign car purchased today if you take care of them both equally. The foreign car might have more resale value after 10 years, but that's it.



Yup my dad's got 236k on his '91 blazer...body is rusted to hell, but he babied the engine since day one and it shows.

Exactly what I said in my last post. You have to baby an American car to get it to last that long. I've seen Honda motors that lived a life of Hell and last just as long.
 
Originally posted by: arcas
Once again, Toyota and Nissan (and I wouldn't be surprised to see good numbers from Honda) are showing Detroit how to run a auto manufacturing business. Toyota reported 21% higher sales from a year ago (a record). Even Toyota's truck division saw a nearly 5% increase in sales.

GM's 7.7% drop in overall vehicle sales (17.2% drop if you consider only their trucks and SUVs) has little to do with UAW or increased pension costs. This is simply a complete failure on the part of GM's management to (a) forecast economic conditions and (b) accurately predict buyer's likes and dislikes. Anybody think GM's new line of big SUVs is going to turn the company around? Let's see a show of hands...Didn't think so. This strategy is further proof that GM's brass just doesn't get it. Or maybe their economists are predicting oil will drop back down to $35/barrel...

The reason that they continue to build big SUVs is because they have no choice now. It's not like 3 years ago when these designs were being created someone said "Gas is going to be at $2.50 a gallon!" No, they assumed that it would hover slightly above what it was at the time, around $1.40. You can't just change a production run when you are talking about vehicles like this. A commitment is made and it is pretty much binding.

Not only that, GM is forced to create vehicles that are in the same price-range as Japanese counterparts, but they can't put the same quality into it because of overhead, as described above.

And if you think GM was the only one not to predict rising gas prices, you are wrong. Everyone is releasing bigger vehicles designed around forecasts made a few years ago because they are too far along to stop now.
 
Originally posted by: alent1234
I just did a paper for school and the topic was GM's current problems. I forgot the final figure, but it's $1525 per vehicle. The unionized people pay 7% of their costs, the salaried people 27%. The average in the US is 32%. 1/3 of GM's unionized workforce is obese and this costs them $286 million per year in additional expenditures. They spend a ton of money on lifestyle drugs like Lipitor, blood pressure medicines and everything else that comes with obesity. In a lot of GM's factories it is still OK to smoke while working. In one factory there is a bar in the parking lot where the people go to drink for lunch and eat pork rinds. And of course they pay for their retirees' healthcare.

Unless the UAW comes into the real world, there will be a lot of unemployed auto workers soon

Sounds like it's time to find a new workforce, lol.
 
Originally posted by: iamwiz82

And if you think GM was the only one not to predict rising gas prices, you are wrong. Everyone is releasing bigger vehicles designed around forecasts made a few years ago because they are too far along to stop now.

Certainly true, but the difference is others have a strong passenger car lineup to fall back on.
 
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: iamwiz82

And if you think GM was the only one not to predict rising gas prices, you are wrong. Everyone is releasing bigger vehicles designed around forecasts made a few years ago because they are too far along to stop now.

Certainly true, but the difference is others have a strong passenger car lineup to fall back on.

Correct. I was merely pointing out that no one forecasted this.
 
Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete

Sounds like it's time to find a new workforce, lol.

Maybe they should move their plants all down by where Toyota and Honda's plants are, and offer all the workers there more money (which would probably still be a ton less than they are paying now) to steal their work force.
 
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: arcas
Once again, Toyota and Nissan (and I wouldn't be surprised to see good numbers from Honda) are showing Detroit how to run a auto manufacturing business. Toyota reported 21% higher sales from a year ago (a record). Even Toyota's truck division saw a nearly 5% increase in sales.

GM's 7.7% drop in overall vehicle sales (17.2% drop if you consider only their trucks and SUVs) has little to do with UAW or increased pension costs. This is simply a complete failure on the part of GM's management to (a) forecast economic conditions and (b) accurately predict buyer's likes and dislikes. Anybody think GM's new line of big SUVs is going to turn the company around? Let's see a show of hands...Didn't think so. This strategy is further proof that GM's brass just doesn't get it. Or maybe their economists are predicting oil will drop back down to $35/barrel...

The reason that they continue to build big SUVs is because they have no choice now. It's not like 3 years ago when these designs were being created someone said "Gas is going to be at $2.50 a gallon!" No, they assumed that it would hover slightly above what it was at the time, around $1.40. You can't just change a production run when you are talking about vehicles like this. A commitment is made and it is pretty much binding.

Not only that, GM is forced to create vehicles that are in the same price-range as Japanese counterparts, but they can't put the same quality into it because of overhead, as described above.

And if you think GM was the only one not to predict rising gas prices, you are wrong. Everyone is releasing bigger vehicles designed around forecasts made a few years ago because they are too far along to stop now.

Completely agree on your first comment.

And I agree that GM THINKS they need to compete with the Japanese companies on price. But that part of the reason why GM will lose, and they will most likely die in the process. Why do American car manufacturers need to price competatively to Japanese companies?? German automakers charge quite a bit more for their vehicles, and same goes for Japanese luxury divisions like Lexus, and yet American's eat them up like candy.

In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the current car buyer who is buying NEW, would be more likely to gravitate toward the more expensive cars. Since a) they are already into money or they wouldn't be buying brand new, and b) because American's have the misconceived beliefs that the more it costs, the better it is.

American's don't buy GM because they aren't making vehicles that are appealing. Especially now that a lot of people are turning away from the SUV trend. Pretty plain and simple IMO. Pontiac is supposed to be their exciting division? And the GTO is what they give us to replace the Trans Am/Firebird?? The Aztec is supposed to be some form of hip SUV?? The redesign of the Grand Prix is repulsive. And what do they do with the one vehicle that always sold well, the Grand Am? They give us the G6. Everything about Pontiac stinks. The only car in GM's lineup that is exciting is the Vette.

I miss the GM risk takers of yesteryear. The engineers that thought it would be cool to strap a super charger to the magnificent 4.3 liter V6 and have both a Truck and SUV that can blow away sports cars at the track. The people who didn't care that the Camaro and Firebird only sold as many cars combined as the Mustang did by itself, it was still profitable. The GM that would concentrate on the things they were good at to begin with. The more GM tries to compete with Japanese companies, the quicker it will see its demise. There were plenty of American's that wanted what GM sold, and not the Jap Crap that other consumers wanted. They were good at what they did, and now their trying to be what they aren't, and they will lose

Now if a consumer is going to buy used any way, like most smart consumers do - then granted they will go with Japanese companies. Once again, this is the smart consumer, who knows that they will get great resale value on their car when they sell it. I don't know why GM vehicles have the worst resale value of any car, and I don't think GM cares about that either since they don't make any more money from those people. And I think thats part of the problem too.
 
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete

Sounds like it's time to find a new workforce, lol.

Maybe they should move their plants all down by where Toyota and Honda's plants are, and offer all the workers there more money (which would probably still be a ton less than they are paying now) to steal their work force.

Either that or maybe sit down and have a chat with old man Kohler.....

for those that don't know, I believe that Kohler is the only company to have broken the UAW.
 
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete

Sounds like it's time to find a new workforce, lol.
Maybe they should move their plants all down by where Toyota and Honda's plants are, and offer all the workers there more money (which would probably still be a ton less than they are paying now) to steal their work force.
They could do that. But then that would mean passing the buck on to the consumers or cutting "profit" margins.
 
Originally posted by: alent1234
I just did a paper for school and the topic was GM's current problems. I forgot the final figure, but it's $1525 per vehicle. The unionized people pay 7% of their costs, the salaried people 27%. The average in the US is 32%. 1/3 of GM's unionized workforce is obese and this costs them $286 million per year in additional expenditures. They spend a ton of money on lifestyle drugs like Lipitor, blood pressure medicines and everything else that comes with obesity. In a lot of GM's factories it is still OK to smoke while working. In one factory there is a bar in the parking lot where the people go to drink for lunch and eat pork rinds. And of course they pay for their retirees' healthcare.

Unless the UAW comes into the real world, there will be a lot of unemployed auto workers soon

aside from the sodium...pork rinds ARENT really that bad for you.
 
GM's North American operations dragged down its bottom line losing $1.3 billion in the quarter compared with a $401 million profit last year.
That leads me to believe that only thing that produced a 401 million dollar profit was "creative" accounting.
 
Originally posted by: GimpyOne
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete

Sounds like it's time to find a new workforce, lol.

Maybe they should move their plants all down by where Toyota and Honda's plants are, and offer all the workers there more money (which would probably still be a ton less than they are paying now) to steal their work force.

Either that or maybe sit down and have a chat with old man Kohler.....

for those that don't know, I believe that Kohler is the only company to have broken the UAW.

Kohler? I thought they made toliets or something, what do they have to do with the UAW? Must be something from before my time.
 
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: GimpyOne
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete

Sounds like it's time to find a new workforce, lol.

Maybe they should move their plants all down by where Toyota and Honda's plants are, and offer all the workers there more money (which would probably still be a ton less than they are paying now) to steal their work force.

Either that or maybe sit down and have a chat with old man Kohler.....

for those that don't know, I believe that Kohler is the only company to have broken the UAW.

Kohler? I thought they made toliets or something, what do they have to do with the UAW? Must be something from before my time.

http://www.uaw.org/uawmade/homerepair.cfm

seems to be part of Central brass also along with Lennox and Trane.

intriguing.

MIKE
 
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: GimpyOne
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete

Sounds like it's time to find a new workforce, lol.

Maybe they should move their plants all down by where Toyota and Honda's plants are, and offer all the workers there more money (which would probably still be a ton less than they are paying now) to steal their work force.

Either that or maybe sit down and have a chat with old man Kohler.....

for those that don't know, I believe that Kohler is the only company to have broken the UAW.

Kohler? I thought they made toliets or something, what do they have to do with the UAW? Must be something from before my time.

They do, but the UAW controlled the union there for whatever reason. From what I remember they went on strike, Kohler told them to stick it, and something like 10yrs later they came crying back willing to accept whatever terms he was offering.

This was a bunch of years ago, and I doubt GM could make it, but it would be interesting to try.
 
Originally posted by: GimpyOne
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: GimpyOne
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete

Sounds like it's time to find a new workforce, lol.

Maybe they should move their plants all down by where Toyota and Honda's plants are, and offer all the workers there more money (which would probably still be a ton less than they are paying now) to steal their work force.

Either that or maybe sit down and have a chat with old man Kohler.....

for those that don't know, I believe that Kohler is the only company to have broken the UAW.

Kohler? I thought they made toliets or something, what do they have to do with the UAW? Must be something from before my time.

They do, but the UAW controlled the union there for whatever reason. From what I remember they went on strike, Kohler told them to stick it, and something like 10yrs later they came crying back willing to accept whatever terms he was offering.

This was a bunch of years ago, and I doubt GM could make it, but it would be interesting to try.

GM is to big, and they're in a bad financial spot to be playing with that fire right now. Trying to dump the union, you're going to lose productivity...and if you're a big company its going to be pretty much impossible to get a new work force in there to cover it that fast. I haven't heard any better ideas than mine, flat out moving the whole operation south and stealing the Japanese non-union labor force out from under them. 😛 I doubt that would be enough to cover all their production workforce though, even if they did manage to build new factories quickly and without setting off the UAW's alarm.

It'd be a lot easier to pull this trick off if the company was doing really well and had some cash reserves. You could buy yourself some time by building the factories under the guise of expansion. And you would have enough dough to hopefully weather the financial assault you'd inevitablly have to take during the ugly transition period.
 
Kohler has been making awesome small engines for a long time

Kohler.

I can't believe Buick is going to name a car lucerne.
I guess after the Swiss city.....
Sucks for a car name.
 
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
Kohler has been making awesome small engines for a long time

Kohler.

I can't believe Buick is going to name a car lucerne.
I guess after the Swiss city.....
Sucks for a car name.

Buick still exists? Oh yea, that was Oldsmobile they did away with. Well there is one more reason GM will die, because Buick still exists.
 
on the other side, when you think about why GM is even still in business, i'd like to see gm / pontiac sales by state....it seems as soon as i get to rural areas (central PA, etc) i am all of a sudden surrounded by grand ams and the like...whereas nearer to cities i see a lot more hondas and luxury cars....so i guess what i'm saying is that there is clearly, although its hard to believe, a portion of the public that is still buying these cars, even though they are not exactly attractive. i think a lot of people just don't care about looks or performance.

also, i think GM may solely be held afloat by the rental car companies!
 
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Just in my experience. I've had to rebuild a tranny on my old 94' trans am after just 60k miles. Granted, I drove that car hard and it had a ton of power, but still. Same with almost all American cars that I've owned. Now bare in mind, that I love working on cars, so it doesn't even bother me that much. Its money though, but all hobbies that are worth doing will cost a lot. But for a daily driver, I would never take my Blazer out and expect no problems.

Hell, I've even seen friends of mine drive around their Honda with half the oil they should have had in it and have no problems. For like 2-3 months, on more then one occasion, my friends old 89' Civic with 150k miles on it. No problems. Now granted, my friend is an idiot for doing that, but once again almost all American car owners are. Just my experience.

yea, i abuse my 88 accord with 180k and it still comes back for more. i love driving the MT around town.

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
I've said it before and I'll say it again- the American government is completely oblivious to reality and isn't conducive to any type of innovation.

fixed.

 
I cannot present facts or figures to back the claims, but every American made car I've ever owned has been horribly unreliable and broken all the time whereas my foreign counterparts have lasted way longer with less problems.

Ex:

Volvo 760 Turbo, from 1989 with 300,000k miles on it, never had a major problem except a bad 02 sensor. Leather that was over 12 years old with no signs of wear

Ford Explorer 1995: Firestone Death tires, new transmission, new 4WD diff gear box, new alternator (3 times), interior falling apart even when babied, rear gate not closing, broken door handles in the interior of both back seats even though they were used probably 1/8th of the time the front two doors were used, broken automatic window, interior rearview mirror fell off multiple times, broken A/C, random check engine lights (that two different ford dealers/two different private shops shook their heads at), windsheild wiper fluid system broken, broken cruise control/OD, leather on seats cracked/broken, console as well. The list honestly goes on and on, I forget half the sh!t that went wrong with this car, and this was in 7 years of ownership brand new from the factory.

Tell me it surprises you that my newest car purchase was Japanese and I'll never ever go back to that bullsh!it. ^
 
Back
Top