• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

GM lost $1,227 per vehicle through June, Harbour says

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: NFS4

Huh huh what? What good are boosted sales if you are losing $1227 per vehicle. You sell more vehicle and you LOSE MORE MONEY!!!!! My dog could understand that.

If I sell 100 hot dogs at a profit of $2.00 a piece in 2004, should I be happy that I sell 300 hot dogs in 2005 at a loss of $1.00 a piece when I'm already strapped for cash?

And selling your cars with thousands of dollars of discounts doesn't boost customer confidence. It just strokes their ego into thinking that they are getting a good deal.

please take an introductory economics course and understand that what they are doing might be their most profitable strategy given the fixed costs they face, and that if they can cover all of their variable costs and some of their fixed costs they are better off than merely going out of business.
Considering what I majored in in college, I think I know a thing or two about economics and accounting 😉

That being said, GM is getting killed in pension costs, they have too many vehicle platforms running around and need to consolidate. That and the fact that their plants are not running at peak efficiency, residuals for their vehicles have been down for years, and their most profitable vehicles are taking a hit due to the price of gas (large SUVs), GM is in a bind.

Even the massive price cuts on their vehicles for the past few months has been a bandaid on a oozing cut to a major artery. GM has already said on numerous occassions that their new full-size pickup/SUV platform is the most important introduction for them in the near term b/c it would hopefully stop the hemorrhaging of cash. Given the rising cost of gas, that plan could soon backfire as well.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: chowderhead
they have horrible resell value especially with all these employee discounting pricing on new cars tanking the used car business

i'm sorry, but you're an idiot if your concern is that resale value will be $2000 less when you just saved $5000 up front. anyone who uses MSRP on a car that isn't and never has sold at MSRP to calculate % resale value is truly a moron.


I am just saying if you think the residual is bad now for the domestic (just look at any used car rag or craigslist or kbb), imagine 5 years from now when all the used ones need to be sold because the tranny needs to be replaced or some other problem. All I am saying is there is going to be a glut of used cars in 5 years from all these buying now.
 
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
This is going to kill Michigan.

Sadly, the average joe on the line at GM only knows that he's getting $25/hr to put a light bulb in. He's not gonna give that up.

plus overtime, plus early retirement at full salary/benefits for the entire family.

They make out like bandits - darn good money (60, 80, 160K) plus benefits.

I know very well to do families that work the line.
 
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Deeko
Fvcking unions.

Yeah, you're right, it's the unions. Folks shouldn't be paid a fair wage or have a pension.
CEO's should definately be paid 5 million a year and retire with multimillion dollar severances.
Check the numbers before shooting off your mouth, fvckstick.
Ignorance can be cured, but stupidity is forever.

A fair wage is 20 bucks an hour and then pay benefits like the rest of the US. Not suckinging the company dry for what amounts to unskilled labor.
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Deeko
Fvcking unions.

Yeah, you're right, it's the unions. Folks shouldn't be paid a fair wage or have a pension.
CEO's should definately be paid 5 million a year and retire with multimillion dollar severances.
Check the numbers before shooting off your mouth, fvckstick.
Ignorance can be cured, but stupidity is forever.

A fair wage is 20 bucks an hour and then pay benefits like the rest of the US. Not suckinging the company dry for what amounts to unskilled labor.

find me a million CEOs

and then find me the millions that will improve a company. it cant happen.

there may be a million ceo's but only 10 of those millions will be good ceo's.
 
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Deeko
Fvcking unions.

Yeah, you're right, it's the unions. Folks shouldn't be paid a fair wage or have a pension.
CEO's should definately be paid 5 million a year and retire with multimillion dollar severances.
Check the numbers before shooting off your mouth, fvckstick.
Ignorance can be cured, but stupidity is forever.

A fair wage is 20 bucks an hour and then pay benefits like the rest of the US. Not suckinging the company dry for what amounts to unskilled labor.

find me a million CEOs

and then find me the millions that will improve a company. it cant happen.

there may be a million ceo's but only 10 of those millions will be good ceo's.

I'm afraid you are mistaken. What is a good CEO in your mind?

Today a good CEO is one that improves shareholder value, nothing more and nothing less.

That's what bugs me.....people who can't do or won't do blame upper management. Its business. Nothing personal.
 
Originally posted by: dartworth
GM, Ford, and DC negotiate these contracts with the UAW. If anyone is to blame, start at the top. Start with all the mismanagement that is going on with the big 3.

It's TOO easy just to say it's the "union's fault".

Of course not, it takes two to tango. Those generous contracts were done in the "good, golden" period when all the big 3 make record profits <SUV, big trucks>.

Right now, all 3 of them are struggling and yet, the unions do not want to do anything to help out because they want to keep status quote and to squeeze out every dimes that they can.

Unions members are not realize that they are digging their own graves and their childen futures.

<<<-------------- used to work along side with one of the big 3 for almost 10 years and will never buy a domestic vehicle after he saw the quality, work ethics, and attitude of the UAW members.

 
I wonder if buying foreign cars has any impact on the domestic automaker's plight?
/looks to check driveway...
Nope, no japscrap out there.
 
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Deeko
Fvcking unions.

Yeah, you're right, it's the unions. Folks shouldn't be paid a fair wage or have a pension.
CEO's should definately be paid 5 million a year and retire with multimillion dollar severances.
Check the numbers before shooting off your mouth, fvckstick.
Ignorance can be cured, but stupidity is forever.

I thought we lived in a free market society... People should be paid what the market dictates, not what a union says they should be payed.
 
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Deeko
Fvcking unions.

Yeah, you're right, it's the unions. Folks shouldn't be paid a fair wage or have a pension.
CEO's should definately be paid 5 million a year and retire with multimillion dollar severances.
Check the numbers before shooting off your mouth, fvckstick.
Ignorance can be cured, but stupidity is forever.

hey 'fvckstick', don't run your mouth next time, it makes you look like a fool.

My neighbor is in a union. He makes a pissload of money, I see him at home more than at work(during work hours), and his job is basically a joke when he IS there. Don't tell me about fair wage, unions are a drain on society. I may think the gap between corporate workers - CEO's is too big, but I have less of a problem with that than with lazy, overpaid, cocky, ignorant union works....seemingly like yourself.
 
Originally posted by: Deeko
Fvcking unions.

unfortunately, GM cant do anything about the retirees till they declare bankrupcy. (much like airline companies)

under bankrupcy, you can break all sorts of contracts and cut this and that. cause if u dont, then the company goes out of business, and the old folks lose their gravy train anyway.

unfortunately, GM has like $15B in cash reserves. Even if they lose $1B/year, it;ll take 15 yrs b4 they can file.

or they can give top mgmt a $15b bonus
 
Originally posted by: JEDI
Originally posted by: Deeko
Fvcking unions.

unfortunately, GM cant do anything about the retirees till they declare bankrupcy. (much like airline companies)

under bankrupcy, you can break all sorts of contracts and cut this and that. cause if u dont, then the company goes out of business, and the old folks lose their gravy train anyway.

unfortunately, GM has like $15B in cash reserves. Even if they lose $1B/year, it;ll take 15 yrs b4 they can file.

or they can give top mgmt a $15b bonus

thats a big bonus, GM can give it to me, ill put it in multiple banks, and then after they declare bankruptcy, ill give it to them as a donation
 
I am a union employee in the auto industry.

Where do I start?

To add some fuel to the "overpaid union worker fire," I don't think most of you realize that big 3 workers are paid 95% of their pay the first year they're laid off, 90% second year, 85% third, 80% forth.

The auto companies didn't think their market share would be so low. But, they were the ones that agreed to these contracts.


As for being unskilled. I think most of you would be surprised at the skill required by a great deal of the workforce.

Lazy? I come home sore everyday from working my ass off.

Are there lazy workers? Sure, but at what job haven't you seen some lazy workers?

I think most of you will see some major concessions by the unions at next contract time.
 
Originally posted by: Squisher
I am a union employee in the auto industry.

Where do I start?

To add some fuel to the "overpaid union worker fire," I don't think most of you realize that big 3 workers are paid 95% of their pay the first year they're laid off, 90% second year, 85% third, 80% forth.

The auto companies didn't think their market share would be so low. But, they were the ones that agreed to these contracts.


As for being unskilled. I think most of you would be surprised at the skill required by a great deal of the workforce.

Lazy? I come home sore everyday from working my ass off.

Are there lazy workers? Sure, but at what job haven't you seen some lazy workers?

I think most of you will see some major concessions by the unions at next contract time.

:beer:
 
:beer: to squisher
Auto Unions are going to have to give up a fair chunk.
A secretary where I used to work, worked at Honda before they moved.
Said it was a very good ,job pay was good, benefits good, not great like working for a big 3 but comparatively to similar work in private sector jobs it was above what she'd get elsewhere.
I have a union job, my wife works for a private health insuror, 'Wow , you actually have those in Cananda? Yes, yes we do the great myth is everything is paid for when in reality about 75% is paid for' her benefits blow mine away I get more money and more flexibility in almost every area from email-phone use, dress code , training, work hrs etc.
We haven't worked out what her pension plan is as she just got indeterminate status.

My Chev has 200K miles one alternator $60 one used heater core $25 are all that I have put into it other than normal wear and tear IE brakes and oil, not bad for a 94
 
Originally posted by: Squisher
To add some fuel to the "overpaid union worker fire," I don't think most of you realize that big 3 workers are paid 95% of their pay the first year they're laid off, 90% second year, 85% third, 80% forth.

The auto companies didn't think their market share would be so low. But, they were the ones that agreed to these contracts.

As for being unskilled. I think most of you would be surprised at the skill required by a great deal of the workforce.

Lazy? I come home sore everyday from working my ass off.

Are there lazy workers? Sure, but at what job haven't you seen some lazy workers?

I think most of you will see some major concessions by the unions at next contract time.

Bingo, I sure would love to get pay 90% of my pay and stay home.

The big 3 contracts were negotiated in the "good times" period, while all 3 of them made tons of money with the big SUV/trucks.

I disagree with the skill level statement. I am not saying all unions folks are dumb, but if you know how to read and write and know how to follow instructions, you can do almost any automotive unions jobs. I personally can do assembly line tasks, drive a fork truck, mop the floor, etc. Name a automotive job that you think a Joe Blow off the street can't do it after an hour or so of training.

Again, not all union folks are lazy, the jobs can be boring and tedious, but I seen with my own eyes how lazy and bad attitude that many of the unions workers had.

If things are not getting better with the big 3 soon, especially GM, then the big 3 won't wait until the next negotion but go ahead and start their own cuts even without the UAW blessing.
 
As someone who bought a new Honda this year, I will say my biggest concern was getting something fuel-efficient. No US car company had a car that could compare to what Honda and Toyota were offering in their Civic and Corolla. And as gas prices continue to rise, I am happy my Civic does ~33 mpg.
 
Originally posted by: bamacre
As someone who bought a new Honda this year, I will say my biggest concern was getting something fuel-efficient. No US car company had a car that could compare to what Honda and Toyota were offering in their Civic and Corolla. And as gas prices continue to rise, I am happy my Civic does ~33 mpg.

US companies better be working on a hybrid car. The Prius is already in its 3rd generation... not sure about the civic hybrid. But our next car is either going to be a 06 Prius or 06 Civic Hybrid. The huge tax credit in 06 really sweetens the deal.
 
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: dartworth
yes, it's all the union's fault...:roll:

idiots...

It may not be ALL the Union's fault, but they aren't helping matters.

Indeed, it's probably only 95% the unions fault. Isn't it funny how Honda's are manufactured in Tennessee and they make a ginormous profit...
 
Originally posted by: MisterCornell
Originally posted by: chowderhead
People are blaming the unions and retired folks for the problems that GM has. Well, yes, of course the cost of pensions, work rules and such is causing GM to be not as competitive. But GM has to be at fault as well for not fully funding the pension funds when times were good and instead returning all those years of profits to shareholders.
They say What?s good for the country is good for General Motors, and vice versa. Well, I see GM's problems mirroring what we have currently with the federal government and SS and Medicare. We need reforms there or the federal gov't will be in a similar situation GM is facing.

However, my main thing with GM, Ford and Chysler is quality and durability. I won't buy any more domestic cars until they show they can last. They, especially GM, build so many of the same models across their brands which are crappy cars with bad durability and low resale value. The Japanese cars can sell at a preminum because they are reliable and hold their resale value. American car companies need to get their act together and start making better cars.


You're talking nonsense. GM's pension fund is fully funded. There are laws that mandate that.

The problem is with the health costs, which are more nebulous to define into the future. Nobody knew that healthcare costs would explode at 10-15% a year like they are now, and that adversely affects a company that has lots of retirees like GM.

Also another problem is that in the negotiations with the UAW, there is almost never any give and take. The union just takes, takes, takes, and GM has to give what they want otherwise they will strike and cause the company to collapse. A short strike in 1996 caused GM to lose $2 billion, and since then they they know that they are at the mercy of the union.

And they lost 1.2 billion recently. I say fire them all and suffer for a few months while the new non-union guys get up to speed.
 
Back
Top