Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
A CVT inherantly isn't well suited for torquey situations. The Vue is the heaviest vehicle that I know of that's had a CVT option. Given GM's generally excellent automatic transmissions (hey, BMW and Jaguar used 'em), it probably just wasn't upto par.
Nope. Audi A6, Nissan Murano. A CVT is hooked up to Nissan's 4.5 liter V8 in one of their large sedans Japan.
I did not know that. My above statement is no longer true. HOW DARE YOU MAKE ME A LIAR!
In fairness, the CVT system Nissan uses on powerful motors is not the same as other automakers. I believe it doesn't use chains or steel belts, but toroidal rollers. Basically Auto > CVT, so GM is right. CVT advantage is that it can keep the engine running through constant optimal RPM's. However, customers don't like it, because the engine sounds monotonic, so CVT's are controled to use fixed gear ratios, which defeats the whole purpose of CVT. With 6 or 7 gear autos, there is little incentive for CVT's. So why invest in them, and deal with all the inherent weaknesses?
Just because Toyota is doing it?