Globalist Henry Kissinger year ago declares climate a pillar in errecting the NWO

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Written by lifetime globalist, CFR and bilderberger member Henry Kissinger, Published NYT 1/12/2009:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/opinion/12iht-edkissinger.1.19281915.html?pagewanted=all

The extraordinary impact of the president-elect on the imagination of humanity is an important element in shaping a new world order. But it defines an opportunity, not a policy.

The ultimate challenge is to shape the common concern of most countries and all major ones regarding the economic crisis, together with a common fear of jihadist terrorism, into a common strategy reinforced by the realization that the new issues like proliferation, energy and climate change permit no national or regional solution.

Probably the most important quote of the article.

Translation:

The ultimate goal is to transform the global issues of the economic crisis coupled with the fear of a a shared enemy "the terrorists" into a global strategy backed by the understanding that the only solutions to the problems of proliferation, energy and climate are Global solutions.

So why is everyone so surprised now that they are putting this plan that they publicly announced a year ago into place?

inb4 denier, tin foil hat. This is straight from the Horse's mouth.
 
Last edited:

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
The world is more interconnected than ever, only a paranoid right wing bedwetter would try to twist this into something it's not.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
The AGW crowd is more religious than most, if not all, Christians I know.
So unlike most Christians they actually practice and believe what they are saying? Wow, what's next their version of the 700 Club and Liberty U?
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
So unlike most Christians they actually practice and believe what they are saying? Wow, what's next their version of the 700 Club and Liberty U?

Uh, no they don't. Haven't you been reading the other threads here about the CC scam? We suggested libs act if they really believed it, yet they don't - they want everyone to do it before they'll act.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,584
6,713
126
Kissinger is an asshole. The right is trying to make climate change a matter of political religion rather than science. Global warming will rise or fall on science and factual evidence. You assholes who believe or doubt are a bunch of dangerous shit heads. The preponderance of evidence and the scientific consensus right now is for global warming. If you hold some other opinion it's because you have unconscious bias you can't identify, don't understand and can't control.

You place your need to believe in this or that above the dictates of critical thinking. That makes you a dangerous moron and probably a member of the party of death. The self hate wish for death replaces logical thinking. You have been gripped by what is know as evil.
 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
nobody twisted anything though so .....what are you saying?

What are you saying with your NWO thread title?

What is so hard to understand, he's stating the obvious, now is the time to come together to forge solutions to the biggest problems facing the world - they are everyone's problem and thus we must all contribute to a solution.

The US cannot tackle global terrorism on it's own, etc...

Unlike you, I'm not pegging this as a nefarious plot to undermine US sovereignty which is basically what you are implying(if I'm wrong then correct me).
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
What are you saying with your NWO thread title?

What is so hard to understand, he's stating the obvious, now is the time to come together to forge solutions to the biggest problems facing the world - they are everyone's problem and thus we must all contribute to a solution.

The US cannot tackle global terrorism on it's own, etc...

Unlike you, I'm not pegging this as a nefarious plot to undermine US sovereignty which is basically what you are implying(if I'm wrong then correct me).

It was the title of the article. Mentioned several times in the article. Not words I chose.

I understand perfectly. Are you a globalist too?

I am not implying anything. This globalist is stating what is fact that is all. There were no implications made here. The words came from their mouth not mine.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Kissinger is an asshole. The right is trying to make climate change a matter of political religion rather than science. Global warming will rise or fall on science and factual evidence. You assholes who believe or doubt are a bunch of dangerous shit heads. The preponderance of evidence and the scientific consensus right now is for global warming. If you hold some other opinion it's because you have unconscious bias you can't identify, don't understand and can't control.

You place your need to believe in this or that above the dictates of critical thinking. That makes you a dangerous moron and probably a member of the party of death. The self hate wish for death replaces logical thinking. You have been gripped by what is know as evil.

Since you didn't direct towards anyone I will assume its towards me.

Unfortunately I am not a member of either party and I do not believe in the 2 party system so I'm afraid I don't understand your party of death reference. Is it republican? I think they are the same party anyways....loyalties lie with the corporations not the people. It isn't global warming anymore its climate change. You need to keep up with the lingo as its implications are important. Climate change allows them to hedge against evidence supporting a movement any direction.
 

whylaff

Senior member
Oct 31, 2007
200
0
0
Sovereignty is and always has been a social construction. Ironically, people often invoke Hamilton when discussing sovereignty and the horrors of globalization. Hamilton warned in the Federalist papers of the perils of two claims to sovereignty (“state within a state”) when advocating a strong centralized form of government.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Uh, no they don't. Haven't you been reading the other threads here about the CC scam? We suggested libs act if they really believed it, yet they don't - they want everyone to do it before they'll act.
What's this it you are talking about?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,584
6,713
126
Since you didn't direct towards anyone I will assume its towards me.

Unfortunately I am not a member of either party and I do not believe in the 2 party system so I'm afraid I don't understand your party of death reference. Is it republican? I think they are the same party anyways....loyalties lie with the corporations not the people. It isn't global warming anymore its climate change. You need to keep up with the lingo as its implications are important. Climate change allows them to hedge against evidence supporting a movement any direction.

I can assure you that you assumed I was speaking of you, not because I gave no name, but because your self hate naturally implicates you in your own eyes. And I am very aware the name has changed but it did bring your self hating paranoia that the name change is a conspiracy to the fore.

Had you any interest in this above and beyond your unconscious needs you would look to the scientific consensus on global warming. It is a net retention of heat that is causing climate change if in fact that is happening, as the evidence seems to imply according to the majority of experts.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
I can assure you that you assumed I was speaking of you, not because I gave no name, but because your self hate naturally implicates you in your own eyes. And I am very aware the name has changed but it did bring your self hating paranoia that the name change is a conspiracy to the fore.

Had you any interest in this above and beyond your unconscious needs you would look to the scientific consensus on global warming. It is a net retention of heat that is causing climate change if in fact that is happening, as the evidence seems to imply according to the majority of experts.

I think it was more so because I'm the op but that would be a logical rationale not an emotional one so it doesn't fit your pre-defined mold of who I am.(party of deather, denier, parnoider, ect etc) Changing the name isn't a conspiracy....a conspiracy is a secret...there is nothing secret about this operation as evidence by the manifesto in the op.

Lets assume you and all the scientists in the world are without fault the world is getting warmer because of humans. What does that change about the present situation of the globalists using climate change to further their globalist intentions as stated by them time and time again. I see no change here.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,530
10,966
136
huh? are you speaking in parables?

It was a reference (which apparently you missed) to a rather hysterical part of the film "So I Married an Axe Murderer" where the father of Mike Myers character is professing his beliefs in the secret society of individuals that run the world. Like this thread, based on loonyness.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
It was a reference (which apparently you missed) to a rather hysterical part of the film "So I Married an Axe Murderer" where the father of Mike Myers character is professing his beliefs in the secret society of individuals that run the world. Like this thread, based on loonyness.

yeah but its not a secret so doesn't apply.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Keep telling yourself that ...

/ducks down to hide from black helicopters

Well, where I understand why you are saying that because it was once kept a secret. They have revealed themselves in the last two years. Speaking openly about it. It can no longer be considered a secret with so many references in main stream media, it would be like insisting the Yankees winning the world series is secret knowledge.

see for yourself.

http://news.google.com/archivesearc...&as_ldate=2009/01&as_hdate=2009/12&lnav=hist9