glasses lens type? (aka: zenni optical questions)

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Ika, Jan 6, 2011.

  1. Ika

    Ika Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    14,268
    Likes Received:
    2
    So I'm about to order from Zenni for the first time, and I'm having a little trouble making a decision. Should I get the 1.50 Standard index, 1.57 Mid-index, or polycarbonate choice (+$9) worth it, for 1.59?

    What's the difference between the lens indices? Is there any difference other than physical size/shape of the lens (as seen in their comparison picture)? The way I understand it, from optics, higher indices of refraction allow for less curvature, because the glasses "bend" light more - but with smaller frames doesn't this cause eye strain or fatigue or something?

    If it helps, these glasses will primarily be used as backups to contacts, so generally indoor usage and computer usage only. Ideally I'd like something that causes the least amount of computer screen strain as possible, since it can be an issue for me when I wear glasses for extended periods of time.
    TIA
     
  2. Imp

    Imp Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2000
    Messages:
    18,833
    Likes Received:
    174
    If I recall correctly, the higher the index, the thinner the lens. Mainly for aesthetics, you'll look like a super nerd with low index and a high prescription.

    But you really don't need low index unless you're as blind as I am, or worse. My eyes are -6.00, and the Kodak high index lenses I have (for $250; I wanted to support a small local store:() are only as thick as the frames (3-4mm). I use to use mid-index and they weren's so bad.

    If you're 1.59, not remotely worth it, especially for back-up use.
     
  3. Ika

    Ika Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    14,268
    Likes Received:
    2
    Oh, I think the numbers are referring to Zenni's index of refraction for the material they use. My prescription is -3.5/-2.25, so I'm pretty moderately nearsighted.
     
  4. DrPizza

    DrPizza Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    49,630
    Likes Received:
    154
    As far as the difference in thickness, it depends on your prescription. Off the top of my head, I believe high index are advertised as "up to 42% thinner." But, for less corrective lenses, the difference is much less than that. Another problem with high index lenses is chromic aberration - which is the reason for some blurriness. In the case of the pair I had at one brief point, the farther from the center of the lens I was looking, the more blurry the object would appear. High index lenses are also slightly higher density, so it's not a perfect savings on the weight. High index lenses allow a lower percentage of the light through (80-something instead of 92ish according to one site I was on recently) - this is because glare is a much bigger problem with high index lenses. If you get them, then getting the anti-glare coating is a good idea.

    That said, for some people, they're awesome; especially those with a strong prescription (according to that website I was on - either yesterday or this morning.) Also, the curvature can be changed on the lenses to help lessen the effects of the chromic aberration. And, as said, some people would prefer them simply because of aesthetic reasons.
     
  5. qliveur

    qliveur Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,790
    Likes Received:
    5
    I paid the extra $9 for the polycarbonate because it's more impact and scratch resistant than the regular lenses, and for $5 the anti-glare coating is pretty much a no-brainer. Even with titanium frames the glasses were still only ~$65 shipped.
     
  6. borisvodofsky

    borisvodofsky Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,606
    Likes Received:
    0
    I bought two pairs from zenni optical last year, same glasses, one with 1.67 index and one with 1.59,

    Aesthetically they are of the EXACT same thickness...

    I'm inclined to believe that they Do in fact use the same material since the customer would have no ability to test the lenses.
     
  7. WaTaGuMp

    WaTaGuMp Lifer

    Joined:
    May 10, 2001
    Messages:
    18,198
    Likes Received:
    436
    I bought the 1.59, total cost for single vision at the time with delivery $17.80. They are every bit as good as my $140.00 ones from Costco.
     
  8. qliveur

    qliveur Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,790
    Likes Received:
    5
    Quoted for bullshit.
     
  9. DrPizza

    DrPizza Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    49,630
    Likes Received:
    154
    He was complaining that they sent his last pair of glasses to the wrong address. He thought that someone there wrote the address on the box, rather than using a shipping label printed out from the information that HE typed in. I'm guessing that he simply has trouble filling out forms correctly.