-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
girlfriend ass pics.
Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Ohtwell is married to Aves2K? Uhmmm . . . I didn't realise that until I read the statements tonight. I wouldn't have guessed that. I'm confused. 😕
"Someone said that if I post this again, it'd get less boring around here. So now you guys better post some small block V8/ perl/ other things I like/etc threads.
DAMMIT!! fixed."
Oh yeah, first off it's a pleasure to dig months old thread about a very personalised matter. Furthermore, I hope it won't result in another solicitation through money donation for access to see this supposed Victoria's Secret.
Frankly speaking, it seems silly to me that such subject title is permitted here. And if that's permitted, I don't see why it is wrong for people to start babe threads as they used to. It's one thing to share a picture for the purpose of sharing without sole purpose of sexual exploitation or innuendo, but it's another doing otherwise.
And please note that I made no statement about my opinion on the individual in the picture. Doing so would be contradicting myself. I would only voice my opinion where appropriate, and in my opinion this isn't appropriate with the subject title and supposed exclusion of babe threads. But remember that by posting this with such explicit subject title, you're subjecting the lady in the picture to critiquing, written harassment or exploitation from others. Be prepared for it.
"Someone said that if I post this again, it'd get less boring around here. So now you guys better post some small block V8/ perl/ other things I like/etc threads.
DAMMIT!! fixed."
Oh yeah, first off it's a pleasure to dig months old thread about a very personalised matter. Furthermore, I hope it won't result in another solicitation through money donation for access to see this supposed Victoria's Secret.
Frankly speaking, it seems silly to me that such subject title is permitted here. And if that's permitted, I don't see why it is wrong for people to start babe threads as they used to. It's one thing to share a picture for the purpose of sharing without sole purpose of sexual exploitation or innuendo, but it's another doing otherwise.
And please note that I made no statement about my opinion on the individual in the picture. Doing so would be contradicting myself. I would only voice my opinion where appropriate, and in my opinion this isn't appropriate with the subject title and supposed exclusion of babe threads. But remember that by posting this with such explicit subject title, you're subjecting the lady in the picture to critiquing, written harassment or exploitation from others. Be prepared for it.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
