I read through some of the materials of the case and the daughter seems loopy.
She sent her dad an email asking if she could come home. He responded with a long message that was quite reasonable and polite, saying that they'd love for her to come back home, but she'd have to start respecting her mother and that she couldn't see her boyfriend (who apparently is a lot of trouble). She responded by telling the dad to get over himself.
Then there's an email to her mom where she says (amongst other things) that she (girl) wants to shit on her (mom's) face, cause that's what it looks like anyways. Or something like that.
Correct. I have read through the complaint thoroughly, and there is not a scintilla of evidence that they "forced" her to leave. The family has been fighting with her over her dickhead boyfriend, whom the parents don't like. Daughter refused to break up with the kid, causing a huge uproar. She left voluntarily, but without much resistance from the parents.
Subsequently, when the tempers died down, the dad said, listen, come home, but you've got to dump this loser. Daughter said no way. The mom and the daughter also have some emails, but they're irrelevant to the case. She clearly resents her mother.
I'm sure the Mom is a typical helicopter parent, but the Dad seems like a straight shooter. Bottom line: if you live in your parents home, you live by their rules. Parents are not obligated to give a child who voluntarily left the home a penny. NJ law is clear on that and the judge gave this kid a very, very hard time for that yesterday.
And just so everyone knows, her order to show cause was struck down yesterday. There will a general hearing a few weeks where I suspect the case will be dismissed. Since all the other random silliness was denied, the parties are now essentially arguing over who has control of the trust account that her college money is in.