quakefiend420
Lifer
the 2.5 gp is pretty impressive...you can zoom in on a car that is maybe 8X10 pixels to begin with and read the license plate...wow
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
the 2.5 gp is pretty impressive...you can zoom in on a car that is maybe 8X10 pixels to begin with and read the license plate...wow
The 2.5GP one was crappy because the subject sucked, and there were tons of stitching artifacts (which could have been avoided if there was a human actually paying attention to what was being shot). It was still interesting as a proof of concept, I'll grant you that.Originally posted by: mobobuff
The 2.5GP one was better.
Still, pretty neat.
I can shoot "good quality film" (Fuji Velvia 100F for example) in my 35mm camera, and won't get anywhere near that level of detail (the frame might have between 10 and 14 MP of usable data, depending on lens quality and technique). What matters most here is the freakin huge sheet of film (9" x 18" IIRC without reading the site), moreso than the size of the grain thereof (though that does factor into the equation, it is not a major factor of enlarge-ability at this film size).Originally posted by: ndee
so that is actually just a camera with a good quality film and a good scanner?
Originally posted by: mobobuff
The 2.5GP one was better.
Still, pretty neat.