^ Depends. First, if it was o'c, is it stable if returned to defaults? If there is no chipset or memory voltage increase, then it shouldn't matter to the board. If there was, it depends on the specifics. A little 0.2V memory increase on two modules is less strain than four at default voltage.
Second, if the o'c does not exceed the board's ratings, like max CPU TDP, it should handle it. I mean within the reasonably expected lifespan.
When I do a new build, I usually o'c it just to see what kind of stability margin it has. I don't leave it at the max speed it runs stable, back it down from that. It has never been a problem unless going back to the era ~15 years ago when CPU VRMs had dodgy electrolytic capacitors, and then you see them vented when it fails.
We could consider o'c somewhat of a constant that if someone is going to do it, that they would regardless of which brand the board was, and that if an o'c wears the board out sooner for one brand than another, that makes one brand superior to the other. It is probable that means that brand/model would also last longer without an o'c.
Depends on the load too, someone might o'c for the moments they want the performance but not be gaming or especially running prime95 or video compression, F@H, /etc jobs where it is at full load continuously.
Yes, I think it's fair to slam avoid a brand if you find it has premature death no matter the cause, if it is an otherwise apples to apples comparison.