Originally posted by: EODetroit
Jiggz,
I haven't yet done any quantitative measurements. Qualitatively, things feel slightly faster, level loading times are improved by some small amount, but more importantly are the reduction in "jerks" when the framerate goes real low for a split second.
Here's what I've been using it for: World of Warcraft and the Windows swap file. If you're looking for database measurements or something "more useful", I'm going to dissappoint you.
I have two I-Rams in a raid 0 config for 8GB. Contrary to what I've read in some places, I actually get within a few MBs of the full 8GB of storage, next to nothing is wasted on overhead.
WoW uses a bit more than 5 GB of space. I use a 2GB swap file. The rest is free space. Every time I swap out memory modules to test new ones, or even unplug the SATA connector and plug it back in, the Raid breaks and I have to re-create it, which wipes out all the data. I just copy the whole World of Warcraft folder from its usual location on my C drive to the I-Ram raid drive each time. Takes a few minutes to copy over, then I run it from that.
If anyone wants to know if its "worth the money" for WoW... I'd say "no". The worst bottleneck seems to be the WoW servers themselves, as it turns out. Yeah things are smoother, but 99.9% of people are going to have something better to spend $900 on.
Moving on, last night I did test the Giel sticks I borrowed from work. They are:
GeIL Value 2GB (2 x 1GB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR 400 (PC 3200)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820144322
They failed after a little while. They worked initially, but eventually the I-Ram kept getting errors. Considering that these Geil sticks have heat spreaders just like the OCZ that failed does, I'd say the heat spreaders are causing the memory to overheat. This is because when you snap them in, the heatspreaders are pressing against each other; its a tight fit. Some memory with heat spreaders probably wouldn't fit at all.