Gigabit upgrade fell flat

wwroller65

Junior Member
Apr 5, 2005
8
0
0
Hi.

I decided to upgrade to gigabit between two of my home machines.

Computer 1 is a centrino laptop (HP zt300).

Computer 2 is a makeshift file server using a 3-drive SATA RAID 5 setup via an LSI Logic 150-4 PCI SATA RAID controller for storage. This machine boots off a separate EIDE drive. All drives on this machine are 7200 rpm w/ 8mb cache.

For the laptop (no onboard gigabit), I bought a Netgear GA511 gigabit PC card.

For the "server" I replaced the 10/100 ethernet card with a Netgear GA311 PCI gigabit ethernet card.

Finally, I replaced my 10/100 5-port switch with a Netgear GS605 gigabit 5-port switch.
(There are 3 other machines connected to the switch as well. These are still using 10/100 cards.)

I am still using the same CAT-5 cabling throughout.

The switch does report gigabit connections on the 2 compuers in question (via green status light vs. orange for non-gigabit)

I know I can't expect anywhere near a 10x (1000%) speed gain, but I do believe I should be able to handle at least 20MB/sec (160Mbps) with this set up. But in most types of file transfer I see less than a 10% speed increase as compared to using the 10/100 setup.

Any ideas where my bottleneck is?

Here's details of the test transfers:
(as a side note, you can see that transferring to the RAID volume is way slower than to the stand alone disk -- shouldn't the reverse be true?)

1 file, 113 megabytes in size:
* gigabit ethernet to RAID volume -- 33 seconds = 27.4 Mb/sec (=9% faster)
* regular ethernet to RAID volume -- 36 seconds = 25.1 Mb/sec
* gigabit ethernet to boot disk -- 10 seconds = 90.4 Mb/sec (=50% faster)
* regular ethernet to boot disk -- 15 seconds = 60.3 Mb/sec

1 file, 649 megabytes in size:
* gigabit ethernet to RAID volume -- 320 seconds = 16.2 Mb/sec (<1% faster)
* regular ethernet to RAID volume -- 322 seconds = 16.1 Mb/sec
* gigabit ethernet to boot disk -- 86 seconds = 60.4 Mb/sec (=20% faster)
* regular ethernet to boot disk -- 103 seconds = 50.4 Mb/sec

78 files averaging 1.3 megabytes each, totaling 104 megabytes:
* gigabit ethernet to RAID volume -- 23 seconds = 36.2 Mb/sec (=9% faster)
* regular ethernet to RAID volume -- 25 seconds = 33.3 Mb/sec
* gigabit ethernet to boot disk -- 17 seconds = 48.9 Mb/sec (=12% SLOWER)
* regular ethernet to boot disk -- 15 seconds = 55.5 Mb/sec

Can anyone make sense out of this?

TIA

-WW
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Thor86
Originally posted by: wwroller65

Any ideas where my bottleneck is?

The laptop harddrive would most likely be it.

and the PC card bus. Also try cat5e or cat6 cable. 1000 Base-T operates at 250 Mhz and cat5 wasn't orginally designed for it. You can check for errors or use Qcheck to measure raw transfer speeds.
 

wwroller65

Junior Member
Apr 5, 2005
8
0
0
So, basically, the manufacturers are releasing gigabit PC cards knowing full well that nobody with laptops will ever even come close to making use of the gigabit capability? I basically will be completely wasting my money if I do not return all the gigabit HW!?

What a racket...

Thanks for the replies so far...

-WW
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: wwroller65
So, basically, the manufacturers are releasing gigabit PC cards knowing full well that nobody with laptops will ever even come close to making use of the gigabit capability? I basically will be completely wasting my money if I do not return all the gigabit HW!?

What a racket...

Thanks for the replies so far...

-WW

Marketing is marketing, what do they care if the computer can't keep up. Older laptops couldn't even handle 100 Base-T at full speeds and only operated at half-duplex. That's when "cardbus" slots started showing up.
 

InlineFive

Diamond Member
Sep 20, 2003
9,599
2
0
Originally posted by: wwroller65
Marketing is marketing, what do they care if the computer can't keep up.

You got that right! But I digress...

Thanks for the input.

-WW

Laptop hard drives are built for mobility, not for speed. You would need a decent SCSI RAID setup to saturate a gigabit connection.
 

NogginBoink

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
5,322
0
0
Make sure you're using cat5e or cat6, and not cat5, cables.

You're probably getting a LOT of frame errors using cat5 instead of cat5e.
 

Garion

Platinum Member
Apr 23, 2001
2,331
7
81
One other thing to try - Find a program that will allow you to create ramdisk on your laptop. See how fast you can dump a file to/from there.

- G
 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
QCheck operates from RAM to maximize the bandwidth tests.

Qcheck will give you the best possible performance between two endpoints from application layer - to -application layer.

FWIW

Scott