• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ghostbusters 3

There is no god. There should never be another ghostbusters. If they wanted to make a third one, then they should have did it back in the day. Now they're gonna do it and make it stupid and have Tony Perkis playing as Murray's character....
 
I saw that too, but there's about a 1% chance that this film is going to get made. I'm surprised IGN published this article. It's yet another chop up from an interview that was done with Ramis about 5 months ago. Basically, Sony isn't all that interested, and Murray already said he wants no part of it. If you want more info, feel free to head over and take a peak at http://www.proptopia.com

And for the latest news, head over to http://www.protoncharging.com
 
They were thinking about having Murray appear at the very end as a ghost just to make an appearence. A few years after the second movie, they were close to making a GB3 with everyone on board. Apparently they had to choose between Blues Brothers 2 or GB3, so they made Evolution.... we all know how that turned out.
 
WHY!!! If they made this movie and everyone came back on board this movie would be frickin HUGE!!!!!!!!

Come on. Ask yourself. Would you go see a new ghostbusters. I would in a heartbeat
 
GB1 was pretty funny in the day. GB2, sucked. Better special effects, but overall, story line and acting were horrible. Let it die...PLEASE!
 
I think most people would see it just because it's a Ghostbusters movie. However, Ramis and Aykroyd both gained a lot of weight... especially Ramis. Rick Moranis looks the same. Bill Murray is old and wants to end his career on a serious note I think. He borderline hates the fact that he is known for being Peter Venkman. Ernie Hudson looks the same if not better than before. The basis of the movie was that Stantz and Spengler were going to train a younger generation of Ghostbusters. If they were thinking about casting Ben Stiller, I'm ashamed to call myself a fan. I might as well stop making metal proton pack replicas and buying 1959 Cadillac hearses to convert into Ecto-1's... (All of which I've done 😉
 
Originally posted by: Trippin315
Originally posted by: BoomerD
GB1 was pretty funny in the day. GB2, sucked. Better special effects, but overall, story line and acting were horrible. Let it die...PLEASE!
Click to expand...
GB3: In Search or More Money.
Click to expand...

GB3: Hey, We're All Still Alive And It's Been A While So......
 
Loved the original one.. 2 was okay.. if its a new cast, better story line.. might have a chance... with today's technology, it be awesome ..
 
Originally posted by: Futher
I might as well stop making metal proton pack replicas and buying 1959 Cadillac hearses to convert into Ecto-1's... (All of which I've done 😉
Click to expand...

Why stop now.....your quest for lifelong involuntary celibacy is almost complete.
 
While it could very well lead to that, I do my best balance it with everything else. I keep it in the "hobby" category.
 
Eh, Aykroyd was on the radio the other day and said that they won't do the movie without Murray. And since Murray is against it, I don't think it'll happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top