• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

GF4: is it worth it?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Not only is the GF4 Ti4400/4600 about 20-40% faster than a GF3 but you can have FSAA on without much of a performance hit, I have a GF4 Ti4400 and it's true what Nvidia say about the FSAA, you can leave it on and you really dont notice the difference, even in 1280x1024x32.

2 Extra pixel and vertex shaders pipes make the difference in DX8.1 games and future games.
 
It looks like there's going to be a new card coming out from Matrox soon, and both Anandtech and HardOCP are very thrilled with the product.
So is a GF4 worth it? It was, but not anymore.

Maxtrox
 
10-30% increase in frame rate is not worth extra $200 but Geforce 4 ti4200 is well worth it because it's priced just right.
 
I just got a ti4400 upgraded from a gf3-ti200....my 3dmark when from about 6k to 10k....and now i can play all my games at 4xS aa AND the high resolution and it looks sweet...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top