Here's the dilema. A network facility has been wired up with namebrand CAT6, done professionaly.
Installation of the network equipment is going to be taking place so it's time to purchase some patch
cables. Some of the infrastructure will be utilizing gigE.
After pricing out the difference, the namebrand patch cables (NORDX/CDT) were 300% more
expensive than the generic patch cables. The purchase is going to be very large so the difference
in cost could be used elsewhere (better hardware for the servers). The noname brand CAT6 is
certified.
If they are both certified CAT6, I am assuming that performance should be similar. Or is that assumption
totally wrong? Since we are dealing with patch cables, they are easy to replace unlike the structured
cabling. So if the life of a generic cable is shorter, it can easily be replaced. What are the reliability issues
involved in this?
Installation of the network equipment is going to be taking place so it's time to purchase some patch
cables. Some of the infrastructure will be utilizing gigE.
After pricing out the difference, the namebrand patch cables (NORDX/CDT) were 300% more
expensive than the generic patch cables. The purchase is going to be very large so the difference
in cost could be used elsewhere (better hardware for the servers). The noname brand CAT6 is
certified.
If they are both certified CAT6, I am assuming that performance should be similar. Or is that assumption
totally wrong? Since we are dealing with patch cables, they are easy to replace unlike the structured
cabling. So if the life of a generic cable is shorter, it can easily be replaced. What are the reliability issues
involved in this?
