Originally posted by: HardWarrior
You're becoming more and more agitated with every post, that's how I can tell.
Whether GFT is innocent or guilty of what he's been accused of is not my concern, or yours for that matter. Just because others joined the witchhunt doesn't absolve Rollo of his INITIAL and CONTINUING behavior. Obviously Rollo can't "act as mean as he wants to", at least not without being complained about that is.
No I have not. Just repeating the accusation ad nausem doesn't make it true. As for the rest, you're allowed your opinion. But the mod who gave Rollo the vacation apparently disagrees.
If by "calling him out" you mean that I refuse to kiss his ring then, again, you're right.
No I am not. I'm also not indulging in personal references, as you are. What I've done here is simply offer my opinion of the topic, and your take on it. Nothing more.
The irony of your last statement is amazing.
If by "calling him out" you mean that I refuse to kiss his ring then, again, you're right.
No I am not. I'm also not indulging in personal references, as you are. What I've done here is simply offer my opinion of the topic, and your take on it. Nothing more.
The irony of your last statement is amazing.
Originally posted by: Sunner
Seems to me like Rollo was a dick and got banned for it.
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: Sunner
Seems to me like Rollo was a dick and got banned for it.
Seems to me that you dont have an accurate opinion so dont just post here without knowing what we were talking about.
FWIW: He didn't even get banned.
-Kevin
And he was given said vacation for a reason. I won't bother pointing out the illogical, hyperbolic nature of the rest of this
And I didn't know opinions could be inaccurate, it's called "opinion" as opposed to "fact" for a reason.
Originally posted by: gsellisCounterpoint, in his defense, he has apologized for transgressions in the past on other topics. PM is the proper way to handle issues IF you can keep a civil tongue in the PM. Rollo can be a very nice guy. He is just passionate.![]()
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Hardwarrior listen to me. Im not asking you to worship the guy... simply respect his opinion and his posting. As I said before if people weren't so critical about all of his posts then he wouldn't be so harsh. Yes it is wrong of him to retaliate, however just give the man some respect and dont be so critical of him.
And that is your opinion. However you cannot ignore the fact that a lot of people think that it was wrong. You also cannot deny the fact that there is MANY MUCH worse posts on these forums.
How am i projecting or getting worked up? I haven't even used caps except to emphasize a certain word. How in the world do you "project" when typing a reply??
In your opinion that is dead on. Once again i accept the punishment. Do you see me going at it tooth and nail trying to get him off of vacation? No. Do i think it was wrong? Yes. I respect the mods a great deal and feel they do a very nice job, however, that does not make them god.
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Hardwarrior you are acting like Rollo is some noob troll, criminal kind of guy. He has simply jumped to conclusion too many times. He hasn't really posted any "hardcore" bad material (similiar to GFT's post). Give it a rest and stop continually portraying the guy as some hardened criminal.
NOW, can we please discuss GFT's comment. Once again i motion for a vacation.
-Kevin
Yes, he has. I called him on it in a PM and he apologized. He has, at times and especially in the PVP threads, made me wish that this forum supported ignore lists. But there are other times when his feedback is useful.Originally posted by: HardWarrior
A question for you gsellis: Has Rollo ever attacked you? Whether this has happened seems to be the demarcation point in this discussion. Being that my last exchange with with Rollo was cordial, and we both agreed that this form of discourse was preferable, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. But it isn't going to be easy to forget some of the things he's said in the past. That's human nature, isn't it?
Originally posted by: gsellis
Yes, he has. I called him on it in a PM and he apologized. He has, at times and especially in the PVP threads, made me wish that this forum supported ignore lists. But there are other times when his feedback is useful.Originally posted by: HardWarrior
A question for you gsellis: Has Rollo ever attacked you? Whether this has happened seems to be the demarcation point in this discussion. Being that my last exchange with with Rollo was cordial, and we both agreed that this form of discourse was preferable, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. But it isn't going to be easy to forget some of the things he's said in the past. That's human nature, isn't it?
I will point out that this is a web forum. What is said here will not matter squat 10 years from now. That is my yardstick. If it does not prevent me from putting food on the table, it really is not that important.Webstonings are not worth the effort.
![]()
BTW, HW and GF, I think highly of you both and you probably would get along really well in person. You guys argue like brothers. Are you?:evil:
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Interstingly, yet another thread about the mobo's auto-OC of the video card, with an additional link
From a purely technical perspective, it seems that most people that denied this was possible, were basing that on their assumption that the overclock was related to the system bus speeds, and that OC'ing the bus wouldn't OC the cards core/mem speeds. That is of course correct, but it seems that some mobos now contain code to actually go in and adjust certain popular video card's core speeds during boot (before they can be clock-locked by the drivers loaded by the OS), and if so, that code would most likely apply to the card's chipsets, regardless of whether it was a PCIe or AGP interface.
So it looks like one more piece of "circumstantial evidence" behind Rollo's accusatory remarks is being disproved. Don't get me wrong, I don't hate Rollo, nor do I think he is a "bad guy", but in this particular case, I do think his initial accusations were largely without merit, as I pointed out in the thread too.
Indirectly related to that, it's disturbing that one system component might, unknowingly to the user, invalidate the warranty of another system component used with it. Auto-OC'ing is evil.![]()
Originally posted by: Megatomic
geforcetony, don't worry about the witchhunt too much. They (the mob) had to torture someone as all the PVP threads had been locked and they had no one to defend NV from. You just became the convenient target of rage and ridicule. Even Elite members who contribute much to the forums get the same treatment from that crowd.
From what I understand, including statements from Rollo himself (IIRC), he was banned from some other forums due to his "moralistic crusading". Whether that was truely because the other forums willingly chose to condone fraudulent RMAs as the status quo, or due to Rollo simply being annoying and a PITA, I really cannot say.Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Rollo did not have an initial behavior. When he came here everything was fine.
I agree that sometimes people "attacking" him (as I know that both I, and HardWarrior have done in the past, after Rollo made some rather strongly-biased statements) perhaps makes things worse, it doesn't change the fact that, at least IMHO, his behavior is that of an NV-fanboy extreme. That, in itself, isn't a bad thing, I'm rather anti-Microsoft myself. But coming down hard on other posters so strongly, makes the forums less friendly and open to discussion. I think that was more the real issue, at least in this particular case, rather than any personal biases that Rollo might hold. (I could be wrong, don't want to speak for the mods here.)Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
THen he began to support Nvidia not nearly as much as a fan boy, as a result people began to flame him and he was forced to defend himself again. Then when he voiced his opinion about false RMAing everyone jumped on his harshness. Again it forced him to defend himself. Maybe if people would respect others opinions none of this would happen.
I can't say, and I hesitate to say any more while Rollo can't respond, but ... I think "provoking" is a bit of strong word, it's hard to say anything opinionated in a forum (which is much of what they are for), without "offending" a similarly and strongly-opinionated fanboy's sensibilities about the situation. So in that sense, I would suggest that it would be nearly-impossible to say anything at all opinionated, about either NV or ATI or RMAs, without "provoking" him. (Of course, I have a similar trigger-issue when someone discusses MS, so I'm not innocent of that either.)Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Again Rollo even admitted he was harsh and he would tone it down. Contiunuing behavior is an oxymoron as Rollo is on vacation. Yuo really seem to be putting words in his mouth. How do you know he wants to act mean?? On all accounts it seems that you guys are provoking it.
Well, the fact that he posts things like "sieg hiel" and makes analogies between people's behaviors and murderers and wife-beaters, tends to make that slightly difficult.Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
And no one asked you to. Simply give him the respect he deserves and im sure he would return the favor as would all human beings.
Originally posted by: HardWarrior
You don't seem to be able to make a point without attacking someone in the process, indulging in super-heated rhetoric or ascribing attitudes that have in no way been indicated. Interesting, from a clinical point of view that is.Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Hardwarrior you are acting like Rollo is some noob troll, criminal kind of guy. He has simply jumped to conclusion too many times. He hasn't really posted any "hardcore" bad material (similiar to GFT's post). Give it a rest and stop continually portraying the guy as some hardened criminal.
NOW, can we please discuss GFT's comment. Once again i motion for a vacation.
-Kevin
Motion? I wasn't aware that tempbans were initiated by commitee. Mod?
