Bateluer, that's the second time you've put my name next to someone else's quote in this thread. You've even got nemesis doing it. 
Again, the 5200 is competitive against a 9000/9200, and is much faster in AA (although you're limited to lower resolutions if you want decent framerates w/AA+AF). But I think a similarly-priced 9100 may be a better choice. Obviously, a $125+ card will do better than an $80 one, but that's not the question at hand.
If you don't believe me about the 5200 comparing well to a 9200/9000, take a look at some recent reviews--TechReport's Det FX review shows the new drivers boosting the 5200 to 9000P speeds.
Edit: BTW, that NewEgg spec list for the 9200 is an obvious misprint limited to the Sapphire 9200s. Other 9200s are specced correctly.
Again, the 5200 is competitive against a 9000/9200, and is much faster in AA (although you're limited to lower resolutions if you want decent framerates w/AA+AF). But I think a similarly-priced 9100 may be a better choice. Obviously, a $125+ card will do better than an $80 one, but that's not the question at hand.
If you don't believe me about the 5200 comparing well to a 9200/9000, take a look at some recent reviews--TechReport's Det FX review shows the new drivers boosting the 5200 to 9000P speeds.
Edit: BTW, that NewEgg spec list for the 9200 is an obvious misprint limited to the Sapphire 9200s. Other 9200s are specced correctly.