GeForce GTX 460 768MB with quadcore CPU good for Starcraft II ?

Valhalla1

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
8,678
0
76
I am not a pc gamer, but a friend wants me to help him build a pc for starcraft II for under $700

I pieced parts for a gaming box in a shopping cart on newegg including these key components -

intel quadcore q8300 2.5ghz / 4gb ddr2 800
msi Geforce GTX 460 768mb video card

is this cpu / video card a good choice ?
 

drizek

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,410
0
71
The video card is good. THe CPU is not. Either go with AMD for less or go with Sandy Bridge for more.
 
Apr 20, 2008
10,161
984
126
If you are buying new, go with an AMD quad. If you already have the q8300, get that to 2.8-3ghz and Starcraft 2 plays just fine.
 

Arkadrel

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2010
3,681
2
0
starcraft 2 doesnt require much from a grafics card.... ATI cards have the advantage of MLAA which looks quite good with it though.

You need a really fast cpu for starcraft to see good FPS.... RTS games are like that.

rts = fast cpu
mmo = fast hdd
shoot em up = lots of memory
 

cusideabelincoln

Diamond Member
Aug 3, 2008
3,268
11
81
If you are building this PC from scratch then the Q8300 is not a good choice; there are better alternatives from both AMD and Intel.

If your friend already has an LGA775 platform and the Q8300 is a drop-in upgrade or he already has it, then it's not that bad and should do the job.

If SCII is his only gaming concern, then the best performance at the price you're targeting is to go for an Intel Core i3. A Core i5 quad core would be even better if it fits in his budget.

The video card is fine.
 

Emulex

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2001
9,759
1
71
amd's run hot.

asus essentio c2q8300 pc's cost about $184 used shipped (weird slant case) with video card and win7 license and 1tb drive. great htpc machines if you shoehorn them into a antec microfusion.
 

Campy

Senior member
Jun 25, 2010
785
171
116
starcraft 2 doesnt require much from a grafics card.... ATI cards have the advantage of MLAA which looks quite good with it though.

You need a really fast cpu for starcraft to see good FPS.... RTS games are like that.

rts = fast cpu
mmo = fast hdd
shoot em up = lots of memory

^The general advice in this post is really bad, however it is correct that you should have a good cpu for sc2.

A q8300 would certainly do a good job for sc2, especially with overclocking, but there are better options on the market. I don't know whether q8300 would be a bottleneck paired with a gtx460 though.
I guess it depends on what resolution your friend will be gaming at and how good performance he feels he needs etc.
Also if the target res. is 1920x1080 he might want to look at getting a graphics card with 1GB memory.
 

bubapapua

Junior Member
Feb 11, 2011
12
0
0
pcgameshardwarerequirements.info
Yes, your choice is good enough, Geforce GTX 460 and Intel quadcore q8300 2.5ghz will be able to play Starcraft II with a smooth, even for the max settings. I think the video card plays a very important role when playing a game.
 

Concillian

Diamond Member
May 26, 2004
3,751
8
81
Starcraft II doesn't really make use of quads. It wants really good single core performance, plus at least one more core available.

When you look at CPU charts for Starcraft II, they pretty much threaded efficiency. Unfortunately, the best single threaded CPUs are also more expensive.

http://www.techspot.com/review/305-starcraft2-performance/page13.html

Note that a basic i3 @ 3.06 performs about on par with an AMD Phenom x4 @ 3.4, and scales well with CPU speed. An i3 Overclocked to ~4.0 GHz is the best CPU choice if you're on a tight budget.

The extra cache and memory controller configuration of the i5 750 at it's stock 2.66 GHz performs puts it in quite a good position, and when overclocked, you can see why this CPU was a popular option among gamers.

Even with that the case, I'd caution against buying the i5 right now. The sandy bridge CPUs are out, but the mobo issues are holding them back. the sandy bridge i3s aren't really an optioon, as you can't OC them and they have no turbo mode. But the i5 2400 is fast out of the box, with 3.1 GHz / 3.4 Turbo and faster per clock than the i5 750 / 760. Even stock a 2400 is about the speed of an overclocked i5 750, but consumes less power and it's about the same total price with motherboard and CPU prices near identical to the i5-760.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/3871/the-sandy-bridge-preview-three-wins-in-a-row/11
has Starcraft II and WoW benchmarks for these CPUs (the i7 8xx is essentially the same CPU as the 7xx, consider it slightly overclocked. It enables hyperthreading as well, but that feature is worth nothing to these particular games.)

I have an i3 540 overclocked to slightly over 4.0GHz. Not a quad, but more games prefer a fast dual to a slower quad, though there are a few exceptions.
 
Last edited:

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
The GTX 460 768MB is great - I had one and ran everything on Ultra at 1920x1200 (no AA), though I was using a Core i5 750.
 

sanzen07

Senior member
Feb 15, 2007
402
1
0
It'll be fine. I run it at 1920x1080 @ Ultra fine on my aging rig (in sig). It's only a dual core and everything is stock speed.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
If all you care about is Starcraft 2, then a previous-gen i3 overclocked to 4.6ghz is your best bet. The problem with that approach is that a Phenom II X4 overclocked to 3.8ghz will destroy the i3 in multi-threaded apps and games.
 

Valhalla1

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
8,678
0
76
I don't think we are going to overclock anything, not yet anyway. I haven't overclocked anything since my Celeron 300a to 450mhz in 1999. Guess I'm too chicken

also for some reason I've been avoiding AMD cpu's since my dual thunderbird machine from several years ago and just prefer Intel and nVidia chips. Had issues with some applications I wrote not running correctly for unknown reasons on AMD cpus - but thats another story.

thanks for the help, the motherboard for the i3 was a little bit pricier but with the faster ram and everything this should hopefully work well for my gamer buddy
 
Last edited:

nyker96

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2005
5,630
2
81
SC2 is more cpu bound, your graphics card will do fine, it's not really very graphics intensive. You do need to OC your cpu to say 3+ to make it run SC2 well.
 

dust

Golden Member
Oct 13, 2008
1,339
2
71
^The general advice in this post is really bad, however it is correct that you should have a good cpu for sc2.

A q8300 would certainly do a good job for sc2, especially with overclocking, but there are better options on the market. I don't know whether q8300 would be a bottleneck paired with a gtx460 though.
I guess it depends on what resolution your friend will be gaming at and how good performance he feels he needs etc.
Also if the target res. is 1920x1080 he might want to look at getting a graphics card with 1GB memory.

I'm fine at the same res with 4870x 512mb, everything on ultra. There are other issues, like I don't win all the time ;P