• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Geforce FX 99 Bux

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: bluemax
*I* never linked anything, but you made a good point! The cards with 64-bit memory controller DO suck! Half the speed of the 5200 Non-Ultra is slower than an MX4-440. BUT he linked to the 128MB card which is supposed to be 128-bit. (Early reports suggest that 128-bit is *required* for 128MB cards which makes it the easiest way to make sure you get a card that performs quite decently.)

128-bit is NOT required as seen in the EVGA offering of the 5200

http://www.evga.com/articles/public.asp?AID=133&page=4

and notice how eerily similar the EVGA card is to the one he linked 🙂

 
Originally posted by: stncttr908
Simply put, that card sucks hard. You'd be much better off going for a low end ATI card as of right now.

Sapphire 8500LE OEM for $70 looks like the hot spot for ultra budget.😛
 
Dude... I know I'm getting old when people around here are correcting the English on the "is suck" phrase...
 
Back
Top