• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Geforce 6800Ultra / Forceware 60.72 cheatin' rulez again !

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
and the idiocy continues.... :roll:


I think that the only guy who show idiocy in this tread is you m8 , i don't think that the main post was something like " Please CaiNaM show us that driverheaven is wrong" ,.... i mean , i think that we got your point m8 , you posted 10 times here .
Why you take this so personal ? ,.. Nvidia is not your girlfriend m8 , It does not mean that if people opinions does not match with yours they are idiots 😕 .
If you have personality problems don't pickup on us , forums are made for discussions and not for a single guy opinion .
If it was for the first time when Nvidia does this i would agree with you but is not the first , second , third or fourth so for some people is worth discussing .
Why is worth a talk ? ,...well because ATI might not answer to this now but if this saga continue they will proly do this also in the future and i don't want that to have a driver optimisations war betwen Nvidia and ATI to acheive the most FPS possible forgeting that IQ exist, because belive me sunner or later this will happen . I don't want to pay 500$ only for speed , i like stuff like the sky and watter effects in Far Cry and i don't want to have those reduced to almost "0".
 
I am really suprised anyone believes scores from a nVidia card and 3dmark2003. I mean, its not they dont continue to inflate the score on FX cards, why would they stop now. In fact, I dont trust much that nVidia does, after trying to show how awesome PS 3.0 is, when comparing it to PS 1.1, and saying it was PS 2.0.
 
The rast image is produced in software straight from the dx9 SDK. Think of it as sorta MS's way of rendering the scene exactly by their rules
 
Originally posted by: TimisoaraKill
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
and the idiocy continues.... :roll:


I think that the only guy who show idiocy in this tread is you m8 , i don't think that the main post was something like " Please CaiNaM show us that driverheaven is wrong" ,.... i mean , i think that we got your point m8 , you posted 10 times here .
Why you take this so personal ? ,.. Nvidia is not your girlfriend m8 , It does not mean that if people opinions does not match with yours they are idiots 😕 .
If you have personality problems don't pickup on us , forums are made for discussions and not for a single guy opinion .
If it was for the first time when Nvidia does this i would agree with you but is not the first , second , third or fourth so for some people is worth discussing .
Why is worth a talk ? ,...well because ATI might not answer to this now but if this saga continue they will proly do this also in the future and i don't want that to have a driver optimisations war betwen Nvidia and ATI to acheive the most FPS possible forgeting that IQ exist, because belive me sunner or later this will happen . I don't want to pay 500$ only for speed , i like stuff like the sky and watter effects in Far Cry and i don't want to have those reduced to almost "0".

cause accusations made are bullsh|t. if it was reversed, and they were hammering away at ati with the same "proof", i would do the same. it's not about who is the target; it's the fact that there is a target at all under these circumstances.

it's simply pathetic to me the length people will go thru with a seeming inability to actually take information and think for themselves, like what you have done, which is nothing else than to draw attention to yourself by posting something controversial with very little information to back it up - on a beta card and beta driver which is unavialable to the public right now.

i mean.. you talk of how the quality of effects "matter" to you.. and yet this entire debacle is based on something that DOES NOT affect the quality of the rendered output you see... you post the BS, sit back and watch to entertain yourself. you are unable to even address the points that are made as to WHY it's FUD. so no, m8, it's not me spreading FUD and looking silly in the process.
 
Originally posted by: Ackmed
I am really suprised anyone believes scores from a nVidia card and 3dmark2003. I mean, its not they dont continue to inflate the score on FX cards, why would they stop now. In fact, I dont trust much that nVidia does, after trying to show how awesome PS 3.0 is, when comparing it to PS 1.1, and saying it was PS 2.0.

heh.. watch the video of that. they never SAID it was comapring 2.0 to 3.0.

they did, however do it in a way that implied it, and perhaps it was intentional or perhaps it wasn't, but that's just marketing, and frankly i don't believe either side when it comes to marketing. you have to take what is said and think for yourself 🙂

it's obvious there are benefits to ps3, tho it's evolutionary, not revolutionary. how it will benefit us as end users will depend on how and when the developers will use it, and only time will tell. ati will offer it in their next gen card, whether that's too late or not - well, again, only time will tell.
 
Originally posted by: TimisoaraKill
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
and the idiocy continues.... :roll:


I think that the only guy who show idiocy in this tread is you m8 , i don't think that the main post was something like " Please CaiNaM show us that driverheaven is wrong" ,.... i mean , i think that we got your point m8 , you posted 10 times here .
Why you take this so personal ? ,.. Nvidia is not your girlfriend m8 , It does not mean that if people opinions does not match with yours they are idiots 😕 .
If you have personality problems don't pickup on us , forums are made for discussions and not for a single guy opinion .
If it was for the first time when Nvidia does this i would agree with you but is not the first , second , third or fourth so for some people is worth discussing .
Why is worth a talk ? ,...well because ATI might not answer to this now but if this saga continue they will proly do this also in the future and i don't want that to have a driver optimisations war betwen Nvidia and ATI to acheive the most FPS possible forgeting that IQ exist, because belive me sunner or later this will happen . I don't want to pay 500$ only for speed , i like stuff like the sky and watter effects in Far Cry and i don't want to have those reduced to almost "0".

Eh m8? 😀
 
The point is, they tried to decieve people, and it worked. Look at all the posts it created, by ignorant people. Anyone who played the game would know thats not PS 2.0, if they played it in that manner.

Comments from dev's dont get me too excited about PS 3.0 to be honest. Most dont seem to think its going to help much at all, except the Crytek devs, for obvious reasons.

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=15502

If it can be trusted.
 
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: Ackmed
I am really suprised anyone believes scores from a nVidia card and 3dmark2003. I mean, its not they dont continue to inflate the score on FX cards, why would they stop now. In fact, I dont trust much that nVidia does, after trying to show how awesome PS 3.0 is, when comparing it to PS 1.1, and saying it was PS 2.0.

heh.. watch the video of that. they never SAID it was comapring 2.0 to 3.0.

they did, however do it in a way that implied it, and perhaps it was intentional or perhaps it wasn't, but that's just marketing, and frankly i don't believe either side when it comes to marketing. you have to take what is said and think for yourself 🙂

it's obvious there are benefits to ps3, tho it's evolutionary, not revolutionary. how it will benefit us as end users will depend on how and when the developers will use it, and only time will tell. ati will offer it in their next gen card, whether that's too late or not - well, again, only time will tell.

That's too much to ask of certain people here...
 
Originally posted by: Ackmed
The point is, they tried to decieve people, and it worked. Look at all the posts it created, by ignorant people. Anyone who played the game would know thats not PS 2.0, if they played it in that manner.

Comments from dev's dont get me too excited about PS 3.0 to be honest. Most dont seem to think its going to help much at all, except the Crytek devs, for obvious reasons.

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=15502

If it can be trusted.

well, one could easily question whether it was intentional or not, but there's little point in arguing, i do agree with you on the end result.
 
Originally posted by: Ackmed
I see Jeff7181 is up to his usual insults, typical. And you call other people trolls, haha.

Never once have I called someone a troll. Get your facts straight 😀
 
Unless I am thinking of someone else, it was you. Even had VIAN in your sig, with some wording for each letter.

edit, a search showed me it was Nick1985 who I was thinking of. My apologies.

Still, a useless insult by you. Only makes you look childish.
 
Originally posted by: Ackmed

Still, a useless insult by you. Only makes you look childish.



LOL, very well said, but get used to it. If you question Nvidia IQ - personal insults are the norm, fanboi is the common response. The Nvidia fans are very passionate in their defense. Really what is the issue here, Nvidia released a video card with drivers, to be reviewed and if they do not like the review, all hell breaks loose. There is a definite IQ problem with the 6800ultra on the officially released drivers - like so what? Nvidia can probably easily fix this. Now if they lose fps doing the fix they may be in big trouble in regards to the r420, but again - so what, not like any of us hold shares. One thing is clear, if Nvidia can fix this problem, they have a very nice video card coming to the shelves of a store near you, this summer.
 
Originally posted by: reever
The rast image is produced in software straight from the dx9 SDK. Think of it as sorta MS's way of rendering the scene exactly by their rules
So, will the results be the same everytime the same scene is rendered? Why is there no lens flare in the Max Payne rast pics?

On http://www.futuremark.com/products/3dmark03/ it mentions that 3DMark03 Pro users have Access to Ref Rast Image Database. Is there such an individual that can compare 3DMark03's reference rast images to those on DriverHeaven's site?
 
I personally am an NVIDIA fan, but i do everything in my power to be objective and call all BS on this forum... and theres a lot of it.

If Unreal Engine 3 is going to require DX10 to run properly, then the 6800U must be DX10 compliant? :roll:
 
I saw the video clip of the Unreal 3 presentation, or at least the engine that will power it. The speaker said that the 6800 was the first card that was able to run it. Whether its correctly or not, I don't know, but they ran the presentation on a 6800.
 
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Unless I am thinking of someone else, it was you. Even had VIAN in your sig, with some wording for each letter.

edit, a search showed me it was Nick1985 who I was thinking of. My apologies.

Still, a useless insult by you. Only makes you look childish.

I don't see where I insulted anyone. It's no secret there's a lack of rational thought on this message board. If you were referring to my comment in another thread, comment in THAT thread.
 
Originally posted by: Ackmed
I see Jeff7181 is up to his usual insults, typical. And you call other people trolls, haha.

Did you think you proved yourself any better by insulting him back?
 
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: Ackmed
I see Jeff7181 is up to his usual insults, typical. And you call other people trolls, haha.

Did you think you proved yourself any better by insulting him back?

Watch out, he might try and dig something up on you from the archives as well 😀
 
jeez guys...i go home for 2 days and already i miss out on a 50+ post flame war.

i want to see the screenshots from the DH article without the colored mipmap overlay. then i'd put them up here and create a poll. i'll give $1000 to the person who can tell one video card from the other.

this is a stupid thread. and i am stupider for having posted in it. 😀

-Vivan
 
Originally posted by: vshah
jeez guys...i go home for 2 days and already i miss out on a 50+ post flame war.

i want to see the screenshots from the DH article without the colored mipmap overlay. then i'd put them up here and create a poll. i'll give $1000 to the person who can tell one video card from the other.

this is a stupid thread. and i am stupider for having posted in it. 😀

-Vivan

is "stupider" a word? 😉
 
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: vshah
jeez guys...i go home for 2 days and already i miss out on a 50+ post flame war.

i want to see the screenshots from the DH article without the colored mipmap overlay. then i'd put them up here and create a poll. i'll give $1000 to the person who can tell one video card from the other.

this is a stupid thread. and i am stupider for having posted in it. 😀

-Vivan

is "stupider" a word? 😉

LOL... I was going to comment on that as well 😀
 
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: vshah
jeez guys...i go home for 2 days and already i miss out on a 50+ post flame war.

i want to see the screenshots from the DH article without the colored mipmap overlay. then i'd put them up here and create a poll. i'll give $1000 to the person who can tell one video card from the other.

this is a stupid thread. and i am stupider for having posted in it. 😀

-Vivan

is "stupider" a word? 😉

LOL... I was going to comment on that as well 😀

duh..of course it is. you guys are the stupiderest :beer:
 
Back
Top