Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Extelleron
There are always going to be different rights for groups that are different; males and females do not have the same rights in every instance.
Marriage is a union between a man and a woman and thus intrinsically excludes gay couples. Homosexual couples may (in certain states) and should be able to enter into civil unions and live together, recognized by the government as a couple. That is the only right that is granted to anyone as a citizen, the right to be free and to be together with whom you choose. Marriage is not a right.
Marriage is in fact a right to all groups once you grant it to one. I suggest you read the US Supreme Court case of Loving v. Virginia and get back to us. The 14th amendment clearly states that all people have the right to equal protection under the law.
That references racial discrimination against marriage, and has nothing to with what I said.
The banning/discrimination against marriage (as defined as a recognized relationship between a man and a woman) by any racial group, ethnic group, religious group etc..... is absolutely against the constitution and is clearly wrong.
Homosexuals entering into marriage is another story. They want to change the meaning of marriage to be simply a relationship between two people and thus have the legal right to marriage. But if you accept marriage to be a relationship between a man and a woman, there is no legal right for gays to marry. Civil unions are another story.
Your argument is nothing but 'discrimination based on people born with a certain race is bad, but discriminaiton against people born with a certain orientation is good'.
It shows that you are not too rational You are a creature of your time, your environment, unable to understand the principles. You are a follower, a sheep, of the current mores.
What you would need to do to defend your discrimination is to show why - why, completely missing from your post - two loving adults who were born gay are 'second class citizens'.
Why, more than 'tradition', marriage has to only be one man and one woman (just as those who wanted to limitmarriage by race had to justify that discrimination).
Exactly. This is where the bigot goes blind. No why is necessary. For the bigot it's a given.