• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Gay marriage poll

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: conjur
US Constitution trumps bigotry. Option #1.

See, no, no, you've got it all wrong, see? It's not bigotry, they just can't use the same word for it.

Does it matter what you call it if it means the same thing? This is just stupid. They should both be civil unions and you can call it lkfsdfsdkhf if you want.

Doesn't matter a lot but it matters. What if we called all spouses husbands? Why not have more words that mean different things? Wife means woman married to a man. Husband means man woman to a woman. X means woman married to a woman. Y means husband married to a husband. I like civil unions on linguistic grounds. Do I think it's very important? No.

Husband = Male Spouse
Wife = Female Spouse
=> "I now pronounce you wife and wife"?

Or my personal preference: wife²

No, you have it all wrong.

And = +

So you would use a coefficient instead and get 2wife
 
Originally posted by: Hulk
I love that remark and your signature. That's the kind of wackyness that'll keep the GOP in power for a hundred years!!

Keep up the good work!
I like 'em, too, but mainly because they're all true. Tell you what -- I'll kiss your elephant, and you can kiss my ass... err... donkey. 😉

 
Back
Top