Garrison Keillor on the Republican Party

[squirrel dog]

NPR doesnt like the GOP . What , when did this happen ?

 

[feralkid]

Originally posted by: squirrel dog
NPR doesnt like the GOP . What , when did this happen ?

So GK and NPR are one in the same?

Got any more?

 

[FrancesBeansRevenge]

Originally posted by: DonVito

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

well if thats the most significant retort you have then so be it....too funny!
Your very response says your listening to me.

Rofl...a fish icon.....hahahaaaaa

Correction: make that an an adult man who names himself after an otherworldy sci-fi elf, doesn't know the difference between "your" and "you're," and rolls on the floor laughing at things that are not even marginally funny. Did your mother drop you on your head or something?

Indeed. And, as we know, simplicity of thought lends itself to a simplisitic, dogmatic belief system.

I wouldn't waste my time 🙂

 

[Starbuck1975]

It is to YOU; someone who is admittedly ignorant of the author. How utterly lame.

The intelligence, maturity and thoroughness of your response has surely put me in my place and shown me the error in my ways.

 

[feralkid]

Originally posted by: Starbuck1975

It is to YOU; someone who is admittedly ignorant of the author. How utterly lame.

The intelligence, maturity and thoroughness of your response has surely put me in my place and shown me the error in my ways.

Well I'll explain it to you:

1. You claimed ignorance of the author.
2. You then declared the author "unimportant".
3. To declare someone unimportant, while being clueless to their identity is lame.

 

[ciba]

Despising pelosi has nothing to do with the orifice of choice in SF. It has to do with the fact that she is an absolute liberal whackjob who is only slightly more in touch with reality than Boxer.

 

[RMich]

Originally posted by: ciba
Despising pelosi has nothing to do with the orifice of choice in SF. It has to do with the fact that she is an absolute liberal whackjob who is only slightly more in touch with reality than Boxer.

Once upon a time I might have agreed with you, but the Republicans have revolutionized whackjobbing. Nowadays, a liberal whackjob is practically an oxymoron. They were the Woolworths of whackjobbing, innovative in their time, but absolutely driven from the field by the new Walmarts of whackjobbing.

 

[jjzelinski]

Originally posted by: Starbuck1975

I like the fact that you see more and more of these types of editorials and articles everyday.

Easy to kick the President when he is down in the polls...where was the brave voice of dissent against the Bush Administration when he formulated the policies that got the nation into such a mess.

Well not that it matters but those voices were all over this forum. Feel free to peruse the threads shortly prior to March 2003, you might be suprised how clairvoyant some members are.

 

[ciba]

Originally posted by: RMich

Originally posted by: ciba
Despising pelosi has nothing to do with the orifice of choice in SF. It has to do with the fact that she is an absolute liberal whackjob who is only slightly more in touch with reality than Boxer.

Once upon a time I might have agreed with you, but the Republicans have revolutionized whackjobbing. Nowadays, a liberal whackjob is an oxymoron.

I should have added: "and falling just behind Hatch."

 

[Starbuck1975]

Well I'll explain it to you:

1. You claimed ignorance of the author.
2. You then declared the author "unimportant".
3. To declare someone unimportant, while being clueless to their identity is lame.

1. Having knowledge of an author is not a prerequisite for disagreeing with what said author writes.
2. I declared the author's points unimportant...his significance is irrelevant.
3. The entire basis of your contention with me is lame.

Well not that it matters but those voices were all over this forum. Feel free to peruse the threads shortly prior to March 2003, you might be suprised how clairvoyant some members are.

Clarification...voices that can actually make a difference...there were plenty of people in disagreement with Bush from the moment he took office...those who were in positions to do something about it were largely silent.