Could someone explain to me the appeal of this deal? I would totally get it if the 360 Slim were $200 MSRP. At $300 though, you're still paying $170 out-of-pocket (assuming typical trade-in of 360+1 controller+20GB) for a console that basically does the exact same thing that your old one did. Yes, I understand 250GB is a lot more than 20GB, and that the wireless is built-in. (I would *really* understand if you had one of the pre-HDMI 360's.) But personally I'm at around 11GB of storage on my 360, and if I need more than 20GB, then I won't mind using a USB stick. And if the wireless were that big a deal to you, then you'd already have paid $80 for the adapter that they're going to give you $40 for, or you'd have run a network cable to your TV area, so the wireless isn't going to do much for you there either.
And why would anybody trade in an extra controller? It's not like they won't work with the new version... I can see trading in one (as required for the trade-in of the 360), since you'll be getting a new one with the Slim, but why would you trade in an extra Wireless controller for $25 that you're just going to have to buy again for $50? Unless you've got a surplus of controllers just lying around that you're never going to use again?
I know the 360 Slim *should* be more reliable over the long-run (I would be surprised though if there weren't some bugs in the Slim to be worked out). But is it worth $170 out of pocket today to trade in your perfectly good, working 360 for a brand-new one, when you could just wait until your current 360 RROD's and then pay ~$100 for a used Arcade model, where you can just slide in your old HDD and play away without any transfer nonsense?
I'm not trying to crap, but I really feel like maybe I'm missing something obvious here...? I've looked at this deal daily since it was announced, and I still can't figure it out....