Gamespot slams Alpha Protocol

KaOTiK

Lifer
Feb 5, 2001
10,877
8
81
I'm still hoping hope for it, and even still I'll pick it up when it goes on sale on Steam probably. It just looks interesting to me.
 

fatpat268

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2006
5,853
0
71
Bit-tech also posted a scathing review... 5/10 if I remember right.

And I agree with the reviews... the game is downright terrible.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
that sucks, i was looking forward to this game. good thing I didn't pre-order it.
 

Dorkenstein

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2004
3,554
0
0
Sucks to hear, really. Hopefully Obsidian doesn't get "re-structured", but I did expect more from them.
 

quadomatic

Senior member
May 13, 2007
993
0
76
Oh shit, I really wanted this game...or at least I did. That's a shame.

Hopefully Fallout Vegas isn't screwed...
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
I stopped taking them seriously when they accepted bribes to review Doom 3 favorably and fired people who didnt play ball.

And besides which, knowing what I do about games these days, I'd rather take something that was insanely fun but had issues, over a game that was super pretty and not fun. Crysis had this problem.
 

Dorkenstein

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2004
3,554
0
0
I kind of still want to try it, sheerly out of boredom. The negative reviews are pretty scathing though. Not worth the risk.
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Chris Avellone made a bad game? What is the world coming to?

Did the publishers force them to release it long before it was ready, like with KOTOR 2?
 

Dorkenstein

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2004
3,554
0
0
Based on an "anonymous" info leak, there was rampant mis-management by certain team members.
 

simonizor

Golden Member
Feb 8, 2010
1,312
0
0
Most games that try to combine two play styles fail miserably. To do two types of game play in one game and do it well takes a lot of time. Most publishers aren't willing to let their developers spend more than 2 years on a game anymore, so all of the good games are fairly shallow, while the games that try to add depth usually end up messing up the basics. Ever since this generation of consoles came out it's been a rush to get out whatever game you can just to make a buck off of it. If the game fails, fuck it and move on to the next one. Support after the sale is slowly fading away. The only thing the publishers are interested in is making more money, so they push the developers to make more map packs instead of fix the issues with the games.

That being said, I am not at all surprised to see this game getting bad reviews. Perhaps if it had a longer development time it could have been the game that people wanted it to be, but the publishers don't really give a shit about what people think anymore. As long as a couple hundred thousand people make the mistake of buying their game, they'll make their money's worth.
 

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,140
138
106
The hacking in this game is fucking bullshit. Especially the bombs in the museum level. Oh, and the mouse look is fucked-up too, it randomly repositions the camera while walking around and I end up looking at a floor tile while 5 bad guys shoot the shit out of me. I regret buying it.
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
OK, do I have hope in this game shaping up? Can the problems with it be fixed via patches or is this thing lack finished content (KOTOR 2) and/or beyond hope of gameplay salvation?
 

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,140
138
106
I don't know Schadenfroh, but the question to ask is does Obsidian thinks it needs fixing, and will they release patches? I read a rumor over on destructoid that alleges the director in charge of the game said there's nothing wrong with it, basically.
 

zerogear

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2000
5,611
9
81
I was playing this game until I got frustrated that it freezes for 5 seconds when you try to buy anything. Patch it, and then I'll give it a go. At the moment, it's pretty unplayable.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Well shit I bought it without looking at reviews, here is hoping Obsidian polishes this.
 

coloumb

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,069
0
81
erratic mouse/camera movements can be fixed by modifying the APEngine.ini file:

FIX FOR SHUTTERING from OBSIDIAN FORUM:
in APEngine.ini ( C:\Users\<yourname>\Documents\Alpha Protocol\APGame\Config)
change this values to this:
UseBackgroundLevelStreaming=false
OnlyStreamInTextures=true
OneFrameThreadLag=False

Once I modified those values - camera/mouse stuttering disappeared. :)

The game takes a bit to get use to - reminds me of playing STALKER for the first few hours - sub par graphics, clunky combat, etc. I'd suggest running the training areas a few times until you get a good feel for how combat, stealth, hacking work before taking on your first mission.

I get the feeling they wanted to make a "Splinter Cell Conviction/24" [the show] type of game with RPG elements [stealth, weapon skills, toughness, melee combat, etc]. I chose to start out as a stealthy character - and once I purchased a "stealth suit" + increased my stealthiness [where they always show up on the "radar"] - I can easily sneak up on most enemies and crack their skulls... or put a bullet in their head with my silencer equipped pistol. :)

Conversation is very similar to the "bioware" rpg choices - depending upon your choice will determine who "loves", likes, dislikes, or outright hates you.

Computer Hacking - it's clunky -but again, once you get use to it - it becomes tolerable. If you don't like it - you can always carry around and use EMP devices. :)

Eh... it's a clunky game..but like STALKER... it grows on you after you've finished a few missions.