gamegpuCall of Duty Ghosts Benchmarks

csbin

Senior member
Feb 4, 2013
841
358
136
http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/call-of-duty-ghosts-test-gpu.html

1080P

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-test-ghost_1920.jpg


http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-test-ghost_1920_msaa.jpg


1600P

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-test-ghost_2560.jpg


http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-test-ghost_2560_msaa.jpg



4K

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-test-ghost_3840.jpg


http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-test-ghost_3840_msaa.jpg



CPU Benchmarks

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-test-ghost_proz.jpg
 

Borealis7

Platinum Member
Oct 19, 2006
2,914
205
106
@ CPU benchmarks: looks like AMD finally caught up with...SNB...

on the GPU side, no surprises there. also, no 290/X, and CF is borken (7990 & ARES II) which is a problem since they use the ARES II for CPU benchmarks, but then again, it's a basis for comparison.
i'm guessing this is not a GE title, amiright? ;)
 
Last edited:

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
Isnt it rather semi pointless to post gamegpu GPU benchmarks without the 290/290X?

Also last time I checked, gamegpu didnt have an FX9570, they simply overclocked one and gave it turbo for all cores so to say. Not to mention they are both listed wrong in terms of frequency, unless they are both overclocked.
 

rancherlee

Senior member
Jul 9, 2000
707
18
81
Looks like anything past 2 cores is useless, all the phenoms are close, all the FXs are grouped tho there generation also. The surprising jump is between the FX series chips, about 25-30% on the 41/61/81xx vs 43/63/83xx!
 

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,629
160
106
Strange, because AMD didn't release new CPU in some time now. How could they improve CPU without new release?:confused:

I have a suspicion that if you had Q9x00 CPUs in there the Phenom II would be beating them even though when the Q9X00 were relevant they were slightly faster than Phenom II.
 

MBrown

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2001
5,724
35
91
Those GPU seem low to me. I haven't played Ghosts myself but from what I've seen it doesn't look any better than black ops 2. What kind of benches did black ops 2 get?
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
I bought CoD ghosts and regret it - the graphics look like every other COD installment. In other words, the graphics are garbage. It also has major stuttering issues which is really confusing given how god-awful the graphics are.

Considering this was supposed to be the "next gen" call of duty, I was hoping to be surprised with better graphics this time around. NOPE. Ghosts has worse graphics than Black Ops II did, and even BLOPS 2 was pretty bad.....
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
Those GPU seem low to me. I haven't played Ghosts myself but from what I've seen it doesn't look any better than black ops 2. What kind of benches did black ops 2 get?

BLOPS 2 has better graphics than Ghosts, and blops 2 also runs like 2-3 times faster. I cannot understand why the performance in ghosts is so awful. It's like the game has built in stuttering like Fallout 3 did......
 

sniffin

Member
Jun 29, 2013
141
22
81
Have you two actually seen Ghosts? Not saying it's mind blowing but there is a pretty gigantic difference between Blops 2 and Ghosts. In favor of the latter.

edit: You say you bought it so I don't know what to say other than maybe take another look
 
Last edited:

Techhog

Platinum Member
Sep 11, 2013
2,834
2
26
This game is incredibly poorly optimized looking at these benchmarks. I know console optimization makes a difference, but enough that a 1.75GHz Jaguar and an underclocked 7850 run the game better than a 3970X and a 7950 or 760 when the console has just launched? Uh-huh. I'd believe that in a year or two, but not now.
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
Have you two actually seen Ghosts? Not saying it's mind blowing but there is a pretty gigantic difference between Blops 2 and Ghosts. In favor of the latter.

edit: You say you bought it so I don't know what to say other than maybe take another look



The total biscuit review tells you everything you need to know about COD Ghosts:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAgc43e-zp4

The game has garbage graphics. Just look at the textures in the youtube and listen to Totalbiscuits' commentary.
 

sniffin

Member
Jun 29, 2013
141
22
81
This game is incredibly poorly optimized looking at these benchmarks. I know console optimization makes a difference, but enough that a 1.75GHz Jaguar and an underclocked 7850 run the game better than a 3970X and a 7950 or 760 when the console has just launched? Uh-huh. I'd believe that in a year or two, but not now.

It isn't optimized for consoles either really. Nothing released for another 12/24 months will be like you say. It doesn't even manage 1080p on the Xbone. There was probably substantially less effort put in to the PC version though.
 

desprado

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2013
1,645
0
0
yup even ps3 is getting Fps drop till 10 wow even console are having so much problem.I will never ever buy COD again even this is not worth of playing for free.
 

Haserath

Senior member
Sep 12, 2010
793
1
81
So Battlefield has 64 players, looks better, takes less hard drive space?, has larger maps, and still gets better frame rate.

Treyarch(however you spell it) does a much better job... The people that were Infinity Ward have left to make Titanfall, according to TotalB.
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
The PS4 runs this game at 1080@60, but PC's can't? This has got to be a HORRIBLE port to run this poorly.
 

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,955
1,591
136
Will a new engine and mantle be able to save COD series for pc? Lol mantle might be a savior in many ways but i doubt its good enough for this situation.

The ps players are in for a positive monster change with bf4 on ps4 for a fps game.
 

RayTheKing

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
265
0
0
My god, those frames.

@blackened= I've seen a few gameplay videos on CODG, and I don't think it looks god awful. Not much better than BO2 or MW3, but not crap..
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
I bought CoD ghosts and regret it - the graphics look like every other COD installment. In other words, the graphics are garbage. It also has major stuttering issues which is really confusing given how god-awful the graphics are.

The graphics are garbage, but worse yet the performance implies this game should look like BF4. Unoptimized turd.

TXAA is once again a failure with textures on the gun washing out key details. TXAA continues to be the anti-thesis to high resolution texture packs.

MSAA
http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-cach-msaa-iw6sp64_ship202013-11-052013-03-46-58.jpg


TXAA
http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Call_of_Duty_Ghosts-cach-msaa-iw6sp64_ship_2013-11-05_13-04-38-84.jpg
 
Last edited: