Gainesville High School Students' Racist YouTube Rant Forces Girls To Leave School

shurato

Platinum Member
Sep 24, 2000
2,398
0
76
Unrelated to the actual incident but in the article.... a Minnesota high school had a homecoming event called a "Wigger Day". Wow...just wow....
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
In their defense they just got done listening to their representative Corrine Brown give a speech on the floor of the house of reps.

I keed I keed.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
I don't think I've ever seen comments coming so fast as they are on that youtube video right now.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Unrelated to the actual incident but in the article.... a Minnesota high school had a homecoming event called a "Wigger Day". Wow...just wow....

According to liberals, anything anti-white is not racist.
And if the school and students were OK with it, I dont see the problem. Its dumb, but no one was offended. Of course they will have difficulty when they leave school and enter the world.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
I'm not clear on why they are no longer students.

I'm under the impression that they were concerned about death threats and harassment.

I don't see how the school can punish them in any way for something they did off of school property. The First Amendment applies when you're not on school grounds.
 

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
I'm under the impression that they were concerned about death threats and harassment.

I don't see how the school can punish them in any way for something they did off of school property. The First Amendment applies when you're not on school grounds.

Schools have a right to discipline students for off campus activities outside of school hours too. At least in California they do. Get into a fight off campus a mile from school and an hour after school ends, you can be expelled.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Schools have a right to discipline students for off campus activities outside of school hours too. At least in California they do. Get into a fight off campus a mile from school and an hour after school ends, you can be expelled.

Offensive speech is Constitutionally protected. A public school which decides that it's policies supersede the First Amendment does so at it's peril. If the school kicked the girls out they had better hope a lawyer doesn't come calling.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,548
15,625
146
Offensive speech is Constitutionally protected. A public school which decides that it's policies supersede the First Amendment does so at it's peril. If the school kicked the girls out they had better hope a lawyer doesn't come calling.

It's been happening more often that schools will punish students for IOC campus behavior including social media posts. I'm not sure the legality has been worked through yet. Similar to videotaping the police.

In this case it sounds like the girls left school due to the reaction of their classmates. Which they brought on themselves IMHO
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
It's been happening more often that schools will punish students for IOC campus behavior including social media posts. I'm not sure the legality has been worked through yet. Similar to videotaping the police.

In this case it sounds like the girls left school due to the reaction of their classmates. Which they brought on themselves IMHO

If they left because they got grief from their peers then I they got what they deserve, however it's hard to imagine if burning a cross is acceptable legally that two girls off campus would be denied First Amendment rights. Sure they deserve all the ridicule they get, however that is completely separate from Constitutional issues.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Offensive speech is Constitutionally protected. A public school which decides that it's policies supersede the First Amendment does so at it's peril. If the school kicked the girls out they had better hope a lawyer doesn't come calling.

Yep. The article doesn't make it at all clear what actually happened. If the girls' peers are ridiculing them or they feel ostracized, that's simply the result of their own actions and I have no problem with that. If the school tries to kick them out or otherwise punish them, I have a big problem with that because like their speech or not, they have a first amendment right to free speech and if I were them I'd be hiring a lawyer and suing the school. The article is terrible though (no surprise, it's huffington fail) so we don't really get the details.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
My faith in the people of the United States is improving. These dopey girls got what they deserved, ostracized and ridiculed. The less tolerance we show for this kind of stuff the more the nation will be the better for it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/21/gainesville-high-school-s_n_1290929.html


So the families got death threats in response to something extremely stupid two teenage girls (not exactly a group known for well-considered actions) posted on youtube, and your faith in the US is improving? I agree that the comments were offensive, but death threats? Sounds like something that might happen in some Middle Eastern country.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
If they left because they got grief from their peers then I they got what they deserve, however it's hard to imagine if burning a cross is acceptable legally that two girls off campus would be denied First Amendment rights. Sure they deserve all the ridicule they get, however that is completely separate from Constitutional issues.

So we toss out the entire anti-bullying curriculum and programs when it would require applying the standards they teach to 2 girls who made inappropriate comments? Unless you are actually employed by a school system you may not be aware that the anti-bullying efforts are a booming business in education much like diversity training or sexual harassment training are in the business world. Allowing students to harass fellow students to the point of forcing them to withdraw from a school most definitely goes against everything they put out in programs like Olweus.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
From the article:

Just last summer, 18-year-old Kymberly Wimberly of Arkansas filed suit against McGehee Secondary School after four years of nearly straight-As, honors and Advanced Placement classes had placed her at the top of her graduating class. The suit alleges that though she earned the marks, the school denied her valedictorian status because she is black.

Yeah, like THAT's a real name...

:D
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
So we toss out the entire anti-bullying curriculum and programs when it would require applying the standards they teach to 2 girls who made inappropriate comments? Unless you are actually employed by a school system you may not be aware that the anti-bullying efforts are a booming business in education much like diversity training or sexual harassment training are in the business world. Allowing students to harass fellow students to the point of forcing them to withdraw from a school most definitely goes against everything they put out in programs like Olweus.

I'm not sure why anyone would be forced to keep their disapproval to themselves. If the girls left because they felt like idiots because they were, then that's on them. If they were threatened then that would be unacceptable because we've gone into the "swinging the fist beyond the end of the nose".

The reality is that we really don't know what's going on and we're speculating.
 

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0

Real talk.

A guy made a video reply to her video explaining why it wasn't racist. He just so happened to be black as well and reiterated that there is a difference between normal black people who are active members of society, and the ones who choose to separate themselves from society.

Nothing racist about that. I've been in line at the grocery store and seen a lady using her food stamp card to get cash back and then buying god knows what with it.

People need to stop crying racism everytime something racial pops up.

Just look at that ESPN guy who was suspended for using a well known saying in reference to 'linsanity'. Lots of people have chinks in their armor... some don't. Move on. Learn the difference between racial and racist. Learn what context is.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Yes we are.

It's more complicated than that. The Supreme Court has held that free speech rights of children are somewhat more limited, as are other basic rights, such as right to vote, right to contract, right to possess firearms, etc.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,822
31,878
136
Real talk.

A guy made a video reply to her video explaining why it wasn't racist. He just so happened to be black as well and reiterated that there is a difference between normal black people who are active members of society, and the ones who choose to separate themselves from society.

Nothing racist about that. I've been in line at the grocery store and seen a lady using her food stamp card to get cash back and then buying god knows what with it.

People need to stop crying racism everytime something racial pops up.

Just look at that ESPN guy who was suspended for using a well known saying in reference to 'linsanity'. Lots of people have chinks in their armor... some don't. Move on. Learn the difference between racial and racist. Learn what context is.


I don't know why people have a hard time understanding the concept of context? "beloved patriot in the armour" when describing weaknesses in the military not racist. "beloved patriot in the armour" when describing the play of Jeremy Lin, racist.

Those girls were just trying to get internet famous by being hateful. They had no clue society would object.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
My faith in the people of the United States is improving. These dopey girls got what they deserved, ostracized and ridiculed. The less tolerance we show for this kind of stuff the more the nation will be the better for it.

What makes your lack of tolerance any better then the girls in the video?