Originally posted by: DaiShan
no way, link? Stop funding NASA, they get all the high tech stuff done fine, the easy crap the botch.
Originally posted by: Drakkon
What i want to know is how did they get a camera there so quick???
Originally posted by: Drakkon
LMAO I was watching it they were like "it doesn't appear the chutes have opened" and it was tumbling over and over like crazy then all the sudden a big cloud of dust and a big ol mertal object in the ground. They say it hit at about 100mph...100mph my ass if somehtings is falling from space without a chute....
What i want to know is how did they get a camera there so quick???
It looks pretty broken...and something is crawling out...and saying "bbbbbrrrraaaaaiannnnnsssss"![]()
Video taken from the ground followed the probe all the way to the surface, while NASA officials noted that the parachute had not opened, as planned.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Genesis was launched three years ago and was returning to Earth with billions of atoms collected from the solar wind.
Space virus anyone?
Originally posted by: Drakkon
LMAO I was watching it they were like "it doesn't appear the chutes have opened" and it was tumbling over and over like crazy then all the sudden a big cloud of dust and a big ol mertal object in the ground. They say it hit at about 100mph...100mph my ass if somehtings is falling from space without a chute....
What i want to know is how did they get a camera there so quick???
It looks pretty broken...and something is crawling out...and saying "bbbbbrrrraaaaaiannnnnsssss"![]()
Originally posted by: blakeatwork
Call me weird, and uninformed...
but, couldn't they have come up with a reentry plan that had a higher chance of succeeding that didn't involved cloth and bungee cords?? I mean really, they're pinning 230 million US taxpayer dollars in funding on something that, at times, has a hard time deploying for a human being, let alone a piece of inanimate equipment.. I really have a hrd time beleiving that that is the best that NASA could come up with..
no wonder the bloody shuttle blew up, with Einstein's like that on the ground...
Originally posted by: Armitage
Originally posted by: blakeatwork
Call me weird, and uninformed...
but, couldn't they have come up with a reentry plan that had a higher chance of succeeding that didn't involved cloth and bungee cords?? I mean really, they're pinning 230 million US taxpayer dollars in funding on something that, at times, has a hard time deploying for a human being, let alone a piece of inanimate equipment.. I really have a hrd time beleiving that that is the best that NASA could come up with..
no wonder the bloody shuttle blew up, with Einstein's like that on the ground...
Suggestions?
Parachutes are the simplest, lightest, most reliable recovery systems available. We'll have to see what went wrong.
You guys all seem to think this is easy :disgust:
You should apply for a job at NASA as a rocket scientist, because you sure seem to be as smart as one.Originally posted by: DaiShan
no way, link? Stop funding NASA, they get all the high tech stuff done fine, the easy crap the botch.
Originally posted by: Armitage
Originally posted by: blakeatwork
Call me weird, and uninformed...
but, couldn't they have come up with a reentry plan that had a higher chance of succeeding that didn't involved cloth and bungee cords?? I mean really, they're pinning 230 million US taxpayer dollars in funding on something that, at times, has a hard time deploying for a human being, let alone a piece of inanimate equipment.. I really have a hrd time beleiving that that is the best that NASA could come up with..
no wonder the bloody shuttle blew up, with Einstein's like that on the ground...
Suggestions?
Parachutes are the simplest, lightest, most reliable recovery systems available. We'll have to see what went wrong.
You guys all seem to think this is easy :disgust: