Ironic. Condemn those listening to propaganda while endorsing something said by a dictator....said by Khadafi at the begenning of this unrest.
Rather than listen to the propagandas, just google about
lybia s (former) standard of life....
Ironic.
Hell, even China and Russia didn't veto the UN resolution despite 100% knowing what it would lead to (despite claims about NATO mis-interpreting, we all knew what they were going to do once the resolution was passed). The West has a lot of failings but giving a world-class air kicking from the air is not one of them.
Everyone knew that NATO would act militarily once the thing was signed and would serve as a de facto air force for the rebels.That s wishfull thoughts , as these country didnt expect NATO
to breach the resolution in a so savage way.
Was a UN resolution. That is international law.What is ironic is in fact the unability of the western countries
to respect internationnal laws
I did, really? You don't realize millions of people in the US think Bush was the worst president ever? Or are you so silly as to think all people from a country think the same way in which case tell me where you're from, I'll find some murderer in its history and then scold you for justifying his crimes.Bush was a real criminal , yet, you just justify his crimes
because he was your president..
The real shock is why the F did we let Gadhafi stay in power as long as we did. He should have been taken out many years ago. The tolerance for people like him has gone down internationally and that's a good thing. Hell, even China and Russia didn't veto the UN resolution despite 100% knowing what it would lead to (despite claims about NATO mis-interpreting, we all knew what they were going to do once the resolution was passed). The West has a lot of failings but giving a world-class air kicking from the air is not one of them.
Everyone knew that NATO would act militarily once the thing was signed and would serve as a de facto air force for the rebels.
Russians oppose the use of force and consider the Wests intervention an overt aggression, particularly since UN Security Council Resolution 1973 did not authorize coalition forces to bomb cities or take part in ground operations.
You don't realize millions of people in the US think Bush was the worst president ever? Or are you so silly as to think all people from a country think the same way in which case tell me where you're from, I'll find some murderer in its history and then scold you for justifying his crimes.
That s wishfull thoughts , as these country didnt expect NATO
to breach the resolution in a so savage way.
What is ironic is in fact the unability of the western countries
to respect internationnal laws , then blaming those who oppose
such criminal behaviours...
Ironic also your comments , since you originate from a country that
did perform an illegal war some years ago using false pretenses ,
hence , Bush was a real criminal , yet, you just justify his crimes
because he was your president..
Really pitifull usual double standardized view...
Everyone knew that NATO would act militarily once the thing was signed and would serve as a de facto air force for the rebels.Was a UN resolution. That is international law.I did, really? You don't realize millions of people in the US think Bush was the worst president ever? Or are you so silly as to think all people from a country think the same way in which case tell me where you're from, I'll find some murderer in its history and then scold you for justifying his crimes.
France was the one that was pushing for NATO to get involved.
Yet you are hiding out in France
Yet, since you have no argument, you re attacking me as person
rather than attacking my arguments...
Indeed, i ve got a house in Algeria where i go several months a year..:biggrin:
No one can attack your arguments - they make no sense:thumbsdown:
You should be golden then; now you can invite Khaddafi over for some good old-fashioned socialism, freedom bashing, and oppression.Yet, since you have no argument, you re attacking me as person
rather than attacking my arguments...
Indeed, i ve got a house in Algeria where i go several months a year..:biggrin:
You should be golden then; now you can invite Khaddafi over for some good old-fashioned socialism, freedom bashing, and oppression.
LIBYA: Rebels execute black immigrants while forces kidnap others
Comments (109)
ADDIS ABABA — While much of the world’s attention is focusing on crude oil prices and the Libyan pipelines in the east of the country– human right groups say rebels are committing crimes against humanity.
In east Libya, African hunt began as towns and cities began fall under the control of Libyan rebels, mobs and gangs. They started to detain, insult, rape and even executing black immigrants, students and refugees.
In the past two weeks, more than 100 Africans from various Sub-Sahara states are believed to have been killed by Libyan rebels and their supporters.
According to Somali refugees in Libya, at least five Somalis from Somaliland and Somalia were executed in Tripoli and Benghazi by anti-Gaddafi mobs. Dozens of refugees and immigrants workers from Ethiopia, Eritrea, Ghana, Nigeria, Chad, Mali and Niger have been killed, some of them were led into the desert and stabbed to death. Black Libyan men receiving medical care in hospitals in Benghazi were reportedly abducted by armed rebels. They are part of more than 200 African immigrants held in secret locations by the rebels.
What bullshit.
After what Gadhifi did to his own civilian population as the civil war started, should leave no doubt in anyone;s mind that Gadhifi had to go.
At least 15 civilians, including three children, have been killed after NATO warplanes bombed a residential area near the Libyan capital, Tripoli.
At least 85 civilians have been killed in the latest NATO airstrikes in Libya near the western city of Zlitan, a Libyan official says.
The attacks took place in the village of Majer, south of Zlitan, which is located 160 km (100 miles) east of the capital, Tripoli, late on Monday, Libyan government spokesman Mussa Ibrahim said, AFP reported.
Thirty three children, 32 women and 20 men from 12 families were killed in the "massacre," Ibrahim added.
I think a LOT of this is Russia just saying that. I remember the mood before the resolution. Nobody was doing anything and once it was signed the expectation, and the reality that came, was that jets would take to the skies and sh*t would get real. And there was never any point in an drawn out stale mate, so the resolution would buy the rebels a state of the art air force, and it did.One Russian article suggests Russian has concerns that NATO has gone beyond the UN resolution
You don't pay them enough credit, they are not run by idiots. These people knew exactly what would happen.Neither russia nor china would have signed this resolution
if they have known that the western countries were to
cynically instrumentalize it...
We already went over this.the same one that made you support war crimes in Iraq
How was this woman's standard of living? http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/3...ecutioner-a-war-criminal-or-victim/?hpt=hp_t2Lybian had a very decent standard of life...
Let s wait for the outcome of the current colonialist crusade that
is entitling thugs to govern this country.
I guess they were trying to emulate their leader perhaps. But really, nobody here knows if the rebels are good or bad. I have no idea.No they prefered to live from trafficking, arms and drug dealings
and spent the rest of the time drinking and hanging around places
where they unrelentlessly look at passing women...
A Libyan official? Well, that settles it then. Trustworthy.At least 85 civilians have been killed in the latest NATO airstrikes in Libya near the western city of Zlitan, a Libyan official says.
A Libyan official? Well, that settles it then. Trustworthy.
I think a LOT of this is Russia just saying that. I remember the mood before the resolution. Nobody was doing anything and once it was signed the expectation, and the reality that came, was that jets would take to the skies and sh*t would get real. And there was never any point in an drawn out stale mate, so the resolution would buy the rebels a state of the art air force, and it did.
Technically maybe the resolution has been breached, but I don't think too many people are terribly surprised at it, including russia and china.You don't pay them enough credit, they are not run by idiots. These people knew exactly what would happen.We already went over this.How was this woman's standard of living? http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/3...ecutioner-a-war-criminal-or-victim/?hpt=hp_t2I guess they were trying to emulate their leader perhaps. But really, nobody here knows if the rebels are good or bad. I have no idea.A Libyan official? Well, that settles it then. Trustworthy.
Oh, we went far beyond the UN resolution. When it's all said and done, the UN is dominated by nations with dictators, and Russia and China are pretty hard-nosed about voting only for their own perceived interests. And you're spot-on about the rebels; none of us (including our leaders) know if they are good or bad. This may well turn out to be worse for the Libyan people. I greatly doubt it will be worse for the West, though.I think a LOT of this is Russia just saying that. I remember the mood before the resolution. Nobody was doing anything and once it was signed the expectation, and the reality that came, was that jets would take to the skies and sh*t would get real. And there was never any point in an drawn out stale mate, so the resolution would buy the rebels a state of the art air force, and it did.
Technically maybe the resolution has been breached, but I don't think too many people are terribly surprised at it, including russia and china.You don't pay them enough credit, they are not run by idiots. These people knew exactly what would happen.We already went over this.How was this woman's standard of living? http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/3...ecutioner-a-war-criminal-or-victim/?hpt=hp_t2I guess they were trying to emulate their leader perhaps. But really, nobody here knows if the rebels are good or bad. I have no idea.A Libyan official? Well, that settles it then. Trustworthy.
What bullshit.
After what Gadhifi did to his own civilian population as the civil war started, should leave no doubt in anyone;s mind that Gadhifi had to go.
Was repression of armed people a move against people ?..
You ll learn soon that the main civilians slaughters in this war
is not khadafi, but mainly NATO and these so called rebels
that did hide in urban densely inhabited area as a shield to
say that the loyalist troops where targeting civilians...
Indeed, it seems that few are aware of the thousands
civilians killed simply by NATO s criminal bombings..
At least 15 civilians, including three children, have been killed after NATO warplanes bombed a residential area near the Libyan capital, Tripoli.
http://realisticbird.wordpress.com/...illed-gaddafi-forces-still-attacking-misrata/
At least 85 civilians have been killed in the latest NATO airstrikes in Libya near the western city of Zlitan, a Libyan official says.
The attacks took place in the village of Majer, south of Zlitan, which is located 160 km (100 miles) east of the capital, Tripoli, late on Monday, Libyan government spokesman Mussa Ibrahim said, AFP reported.
Thirty three children, 32 women and 20 men from 12 families were killed in the "massacre," Ibrahim added.
http://weeklyintercept.blogspot.com/2011/08/fresh-nato-raids-kill-85-civilians-in.html
Considering that you are unable to add; most of your other claims seem to just be sour grapes.
You love to support the losing side and then find excuses for losing.
Ignoring the actual facts that lead up to the embarrassment