crashtestdummy
Platinum Member
- Feb 18, 2010
- 2,893
- 0
- 0
The problem is they aren't going to be able to go after the console market. If Valve doesn't want to invest billions in a new console, letting hardware vendors sell SteamBoxes isn't going to benefit the consumer at all. We are going to get all kinds of configurations and no real standard. It will be such as PC gaming is today, and the hassle of worrying about how well a game will run is still on the consumer. Console gamers don't have to worry if their Xbox can run this game or not, because it is on Xbox and will run at 30 or 60 FPS.
If we have a Dell SteamBox, HP SteamBox, and a Acer SteamBox, what settings will run on each? Do I have to learn what hardware is in each and what I have to tweak to play the game? This isn't what console gamers want. They won't win any battles this way.
Two solutions come to mind: the first that there's no reason that the settings even have to be visible to the user. Steam can read the hardware for you and know how to make the game run best. It wouldn't even be hard to make an "easy" mode like that and an "advanced" mode that lets you adjust it like a PC system.
Edit: forgot the second one. The second one is a rating system, and games can have a number or name associated with them as a system requirement. I don't love this one, and frankly since games will be bought through steam it seems unnecessary.
They don't now, but they don't have to. As I said earlier, all that has to happen is that there's enough market share to get developers to port to Linux (and the PS4's APIs are more similar to OpenGL than to DirectX). Then, they can afford a slow, steady climb as opposed to the big launch that consoles need.Plus, they don't have name recognition with console gamers. They don't know what Steam is or who Valve is, nor do they care. "Valve? Oh the guys that did Left 4 Dead. Yeah that was okay I guess. I think I'll pass on their $400 console and buy a PS4 instead. I know Sony and I know the PS4."
I assure you I'm not a Valve/Newell fanboy. As I said before, I don't plan on buying a system in the near future, but I wouldn't be surprised if in five years' time we're talking about this as a big shift in gaming (though it could just as easily flop).I just don't see this offering anything to any consumers except Gabe and the fanboys who gobble up anything he says.
I wouldn't have a problem if this does get more developers and hardware makers (for drivers) on board with Linux, but I just don't see it happening.
Last edited:
