GA-990FXA-UD5 or Sabertooth 990FX?

Discussion in 'Motherboards' started by dkm777, Feb 5, 2012.

  1. dkm777

    dkm777 Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    0
    So I'm slowly piecing together an AMD rig in the hopes that Piledriver will actually be good. Right now I have a Phenom II 980 and 8GB RAM, but can't decide on a mainboard. Which is better - the Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 or Asus Sabertooth 990FX? The price difference is a couple of doughnuts and a cup of coffee. From reading reviews I found that they both are pretty similar, but Gigabyte has better audio and Asus has a better BIOS. I'm mostly concerned about long term reliability while overclocked and automatic fan control. In this regard Asus should be better but I never used Gigabyte boards for a long time so I have no idea how their Ultra Durable stuff holds up. I do like the BIOS of my GA-X58A-UD5 though.
     
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - 990FXA Sabertooth 990FX Forum Date
    USB Anomaly with dual-boot (7/10) ASUS Sabertooth Z170 S Motherboards Feb 15, 2017
    Which Motherboard Is Better? (New Member) Motherboards Oct 23, 2016
    GD-990FXA-UD3 Power blips on and off (replacement suggestions?) Motherboards Apr 29, 2014
    ASUS M5A97 evo OR Msi 990FXA-GD65 Motherboards Mar 15, 2014
    GA-990FXA-UD3 vs M5A99X EVO Motherboards Feb 10, 2014

  3. dma0991

    dma0991 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    If the only merit to the Gigabyte board is the sound then get the Asus. Onboard sound can never come close to the sound quality of a good dedicated sound card. The BIOS that the X58 board you're using is based upon the older look. The current ones should be UEFI and tons of eye candy so if you like your old motherboard BIOS, you may or may not like the new one.

    My money goes to the Sabertooth because it looks awesome even without the armor. :cool:
     
  4. frostedflakes

    frostedflakes Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    7,929
    Likes Received:
    1
    I haven't been that impressed with my 990FXA-UD5. Hardware wise it's great, plenty of ports, robust VRMs, good sized heatsinks on the VRM to help keep things cool, etc. The rev 1.0 boards didn't have load-line calibration, which makes overclocking a huge pain, but the newer rev 1.1 (and 1.2?) boards now support this I believe. BIOS options still don't seem to be nearly as extensive as the ASUS 990FX boards, though, and there are some bugs that have yet to be fixed. For example, to prevent Bulldozer chips from throttling when overclocked, you need an option in the BIOS to disable APM (advanced power management). The latest F7h beta BIOS for the UD5 has this, but it's bugged, it will work fine at first but after resuming from sleep APM will no longer be disabled and the CPU will start throttling again. F7h BIOS is dated 12/9/2011, don't know if Gigabyte even plans to fix this and release a new BIOS, they're certainly taking their sweet time if they do.

    The ASUS 990FX boards just seem to have far more tweaking options and are more polished.
     
  5. sandorski

    sandorski No Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    62,538
    Likes Received:
    480
    If it's between Audio and BIOS, I'd pick Audio everytime. Then again, I'll go into BIOS once a year, if I'm busy anyway.
     
  6. dkm777

    dkm777 Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    0
    Another thing that I forgot to mention - I really like Asus' fan control feature for case fans. Now that Frostedflakes mentioned bugs in UD5 BIOS, I think I'll go for the Asus. This is for a backup rig and good audio is nice to have, but not crucial. Power management and quiet operation while on low loads, however, is.
     
  7. frostedflakes

    frostedflakes Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    7,929
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well my gripes with the UD5 have been more related to overclocking/tweaking options, if you plan to push the CPU very hard, UD5 would be a very solid board. Fan control is definitely more sophisticated on ASUS boards than Gigabyte, though, and the ASUS also has quite a few more fan headers (looks like 5 five PWM capable headers vs only 2 on the Gigabyte). The UD5 will have no problem slowing down your CPU fan at idle and keeping things quiet (even with a dual fan cooler like the NH-D14, I just have to use a Y splitter to connect both fans to the single CPU fan header), but if you like to hook case fans up to the motherboard and let it slow those down at idle as well, can't really do that as easily with the UD5. Sabertooth also has a 5 year warranty vs 3 years on the UD5. If I was buying again I would probably get the Sabertooth instead of the 990FX-UD5. Like I said UD5 definitely isn't a bad board, but just doesn't seem to be as polished as ASUS 990FX boards.
     
    #6 frostedflakes, Feb 5, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2012
  8. dkm777

    dkm777 Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do like hooking up my case fans to the mobo headers. When I had an Asus Rampage Extreme with the X48 chipset it had great fan control options and I really miss that.